Tuesday’s Tidbits

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Today is the deadline for submission of 2022 FEHB benefit and rate proposals to OPM. Also on the federal employment front, Federal News Network reports that

Agencies have until July 19 to submit employee and contractor reentry plans to the Office of Management and Budget, the Biden administration said Tuesday.

Agencies must finalize their plans for both reopening offices and setting post-reentry procedures and policies by that date, the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, in collaboration with OMB, the Office of Personnel Management and the General Services Administration, said in an email.

Those final plans will build on draft reentry plans, which agencies are supposed to submit to OMB by June 18.

Agencies can, in phases, bring more employees and contractors back to their work sites after completing their final reentry plans, satisfying collective bargaining obligations and giving the workforce advanced notice, the task force said.

According to the CDC, over 50% of the total U.S. population has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Also from the COVID-19 vaccination front

  • Moderna announced today that “it has initiated the rolling submission process with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for a Biologics License Application (BLA) for the licensure of its mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 18 years of age and older.” Pfizer took the same FDA approval step with its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine a few weeks ago. This FDA approval process likely will take several months.
  • The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released an informational bulletin on COVID-19 vaccinations for adolescents. While directed at the Medicaid program, the bulletin is filled with useful information for everyone. What’s more, the American Medical Association offers its view on what doctors wish parents knew about these vaccines.
  • The National Institutes of Health Director, Dr. Francis Collins, explains on this blog that “Studies confirm COVID-19 mRNA vaccines [are] safe, effective for pregnant women.” “Overall, both studies show that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are safe and effective in pregnancy, with the potential to benefit both mother and baby. Pregnant women also are more likely than women who aren’t pregnant to become severely ill should they become infected with this devastating coronavirus. While pregnant women are urged to consult with their obstetrician about vaccination, growing evidence suggests that the best way for women during pregnancy or while breastfeeding to protect themselves and their families against COVID-19 is to roll up their sleeves and get either one of the mRNA vaccines now authorized for emergency use.”

MedPage Today in an op-ed adds that “policymakers should include natural immunity as determined by an accurate and reliable antibody test or the documentation of prior infection (previous positive PCR or antigen test), as evidence of immunity equal to that of vaccination. That immunity should be given the same societal status as vaccine-inducted immunity.” (FEHBlog supplement — At least at this early stage when it’s not clear whether a booster is required.) The CDC should give more attention to this cadre.

From the flu vaccine front, the National Institutes for Health announced that “A first-in-human, Phase 1 trial assessing the safety and immunogenicity of an investigational nanoparticle influenza vaccine designed to provide long-lasting protection against multiple flu virus strains has begun at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland.” Wild.

In other good news, Health Payer Intelligence reports that “Member satisfaction has improved significantly among commercial health plans, JD Power’s 2021 commercial member health plan study found. “The past year has proven without a doubt that effective use of digital channels has the power to increase customer engagement, build trust and promote brand advocacy,” said James Beem, managing director of global healthcare intelligence at J.D. Power.“While many plans are showing tremendous progress by delivering for their members during a highly volatile and stressful period, they still have a long way to go when it comes to delivering consistently strong levels of customer engagement across all segments of their member populations.”

Regarding the President’s Fiscal Year 2022 Budget proposal

  • Govexec informs us that “President Biden ends trend of [federal employee] benefit-cutting budgets, but new Federal Workforce Initiatives are still being developed. Most of the workforce provisions outlined in the president’s first budget submission are vague references to policies that will be part of the forthcoming president’s management agenda.”
  • Becker’s Hospital Review offers seven takeaways on the budget proposal for healthcare executives.
  • Forbes Magazine predicts that President “Biden’s answer to the [looming] Medicare Trust Fund Insolvency is hidden In his Budget Proposal.” The answer, by the way, is to pay Medicare Part A from the general treasury like the other parts.

In other crystal ball articles

  • The Journal of AHIMA discusses how this health informatics organization is preparing for the post-pandemic world.
  • Healio predicts how primary care providers will use telehealth in the new normal. The answer is quite a bit. “Thirty-five percent of adults in the United States who were surveyed said they would consider leaving their primary care physician for qualified physicians providing on-demand telehealth services. This percentage was even higher — 50% — among Generation Z and millennials, according to the data. Older adults also expressed interest in telehealth services, with 48% of respondents aged 65 years and older reporting that they will likely continue to use telehealth after the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Midweek Update

The Wall Street Journal reports that

A monoclonal antibody drug to treat early Covid-19 infections has been authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, said Vir Biotechnology Inc.and GlaxoSmithKline PLC, makers of the drug.

The drug, called sotrovimab, is the third antibody medicine authorized to treat patients early in the course of disease who are at high risk of developing severe cases.

Vir and Glaxo said in March that a study of the drug had been stopped early because it was shown to be highly effective, reducing hospitalizations or death by 85%, compared with a placebo. * * *

It is unclear what near-term role the drug will play in the U.S., where new infections are falling and there remains a glut of unused antibody drugs made by Eli Lilly & Co. and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Having a Plan B usually is a prudent step.

Speaking of prescription drugs, Healthcare Dive informs us that

  • “The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, a nonprofit and frequent critic of drugmakers for excessively high drug prices, now plans to assess how health insurance policies harm patient access to care, the group announced Tuesday. This follows research by the group that argued cost-sharing should not be structured to shift healthcare costs to patients when they have no medically appropriate lower cost option.
  • “ICER’s review will not, however, look at whether cost-sharing should be reduced for drugs on which payers receive large rebates or whether payers should be asked to demonstrate how their policies on drug access save overall healthcare costs.
  • “Drugmakers have repeatedly tried to shift the blame for high out-of-pocket costs and limited access to drugs by pointing to the design of insurance plans. ICER’s review suggests a new emphasis by the group on examining the role insurers play alongside pharmaceutical companies in determining patient access and costs.”

Fedweek features Reg Jones’ latest missive on the relationship between federal employment benefits and life events. This report concerns the coverage of children under FEHB and FEGLI.

The FEHBlog has been tracking developments in the implementation of the No Surprises Act. In the course of doing so today, he found several letters from healthcare trade associations to federal regulators on this topic. Because it can be helpful to look over the fence, here are implementation comments from American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons, the American College of Radiology, the National Association of Free Standing Emergency Centers, the American Association of Medical Colleges, and the American College of Emergency Physicians. What’s more the Workgroup for Electronic Data has helpfully collected links to a bevy of expert analyses of the law. It’s a heavy lift.

In healthcare business news

  • Healthcare Dive tells us that “Hospital operator HCA Healthcare is linking up with Google Cloud on a new data analytics platform to support provider decision-making, the companies announced Wednesday. The deal between the 186-hospital system and the technology behemoth will build on HCA’s existing use of technology to streamline both clinical and non-clinical operations, and represents “significant investments” in the system’s mobile functions, the companies said. The goal is to give doctors and nurses workflow tools, analysis and alerts on their mobile devices for real-time updates on patients’ conditions, while also improving workflows such as supply chain, human resources and physical plant operations.”
  • Fierce Health reports that “The combined company of Grand Rounds Health and Doctor On Demand has expanded yet again to include a care concierge platform for the LGBTQ+ community. The virtual care companies announced Wednesday they signed a definitive agreement to acquire Included Health to improve health outcomes and address the health challenges facing communities including lesbian, gay and transgender patients as well as black, indigenous and people of color (BIPOC), the companies said in a press release.” Terms of the agreement were not disclosed

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

Federal News Network provides the latest on the controversy over the Postal Service Health Benefits Program provisions in the Postal Reform Act (H.R. 3076 which has a Senate companion bill).

The new legislation requires current postal workers to enroll in Medicare Part A and B when they reach age 65. It gives current retirees the option of enrolling in Medicare, waiving the usual late enrollment penalties. Medicare will pick up initial hospital and prescription costs, and the Postal Service will become the secondary payer.

But current retirees who choose not to opt into Medicare will stay in the FEHBP.

While this arrangement is designed to save the Postal Service billions over the next decade, NARFE [ a prominent federal employee organization] worries it could raise premiums for federal employees and retirees still enrolled in the FEHBP. Those who are Medicare-eligible but choose not to enroll are some of the most expensive participants to insure.

The FEHBlog has a different outlook. First off, all federal annuitants, with exception of a naturally diminishing cadre of members who retired before 1984, have no cost Medicare Part A coverage. Most federal annuitants do join Part B. Income adjusted Part B premiums likely are the cause of newer annuitants tending to decline Part B coverage. In any event, Part A hospital expenses are weightier than Part B expenses. If a federal annuitant over 65 has declined Part B coverage and is enrolled in an FEHB fee for service plan, that Plan covers the annuitant’s expenses at Medicare rates which the FEHB Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 8904(b), obligates the provider to accept. That law has been in effect for nearly 30 years.

As the FEHBlog has mentioned on occasion, the enormous new savings opportunity that Postal reform will unleash lies in Part D prescription drug integration, not in Part B integration. In the 2003 Medicare Modernization Act that created Part D, Congress expressly permitted FEHB plans to integrate their benefits with Medicare Part D for annuitants over 65 (see 42 USC 1395w–132(b),(c)(3)). Integrated Part D programs known as EGWPs pay the Part D premium while reaping tremendous savings over going it alone. If OPM simply allowed all FEHB plans to exercise this option, FEHB premiums would be lower, and the Postal Service would not be militating for a separate program, in the FEHBlog’s considered opinion.

Healthcare Dive reports the Senate today confirmed the President’s nomination of Chiquita Brooks-LaSure to be Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services by a 55-45 vote.

Brooks-LaSure has a long career in public policy, working in the Office of Management and Budget as a Medicaid analyst before moving on to serve as deputy director for policy at the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight during the Obama administration. She was also a director of coverage policy at HHS before transitioning to the private sector, working as a Medicare and Medicaid policy consultant for Manatt Health. With Tuesdays vote, Brooks-LaSure becomes the first Black woman to lead CMS.

The Senate has turned to considering an Assistant Attorney General nomination, and the FEHBlog hopes that Kiran Ahuja’s nomination to be OPM Director reaches the Senate floor soon thereafter for a confirmation vote.

From the COVID-19 front, Fierce Pharma informs us that

Teens across the U.S. started getting COVID-19 vaccines this month after Pfizer’s shot. With new data released Tuesday, Moderna’s shot could soon be available to kids, too.

In a phase 3 trial in kids ages 12 to 18, Moderna’s vaccine posted 100% efficacy after two doses. Investigators enrolled 3,700 participants and randomly assigned two-thirds to receive two doses of the Moderna vaccine. The remaining third received two doses of placebo.

Investigators recorded zero COVID-19 cases in the vaccinated group 14 days after the second dose, and four in the placebo group. They didn’t identify any new safety concerns.

The results set Moderna up for an FDA filing in the age group next month. Under that timeline, the vaccine could score an authorization in teens sometime this summer and play a role in a back-to-school vaccination push. * * *

Even younger children could be on their way to eligibility, too; Pfizer and Moderna are both running studies testing their vaccines in children as young as six months.

As of today, 50% of the U.S. population over age 18 is fully vaccinated against COVID-19, and public health experts opine in Medscape on why the jury is out on COVID-19 vaccination boosters.

And here are Tuesday’s Tidbits —

  • Medscape reports on how the COVID-19 pandemic has lead doctors to rethink low value care.
  • The Annals of Internal Medicine discusses on a study finding that “In clinician-owned practices, implementing a workflow to routinely screen, counsel, and connect patients to smoking cessation resources, or implementing a documentation change or a referral to a resource alone led to an improvement of at least 10 points in the smoking outcome with a moderate level of facilitation support. These patterns did not manifest in health- or hospital system–owned practices or in Federally Qualified Health Centers, however. The [blood pressure] BP outcome improved by at least 10 points among solo practices after medical assistants were trained to take an accurate BP. Among larger, clinician-owned practices, BP outcomes improved when practices implemented a second BP measurement when the first was elevated, and when staff learned where to document this information in the electronic health record. With 50 hours or more of facilitation, BP outcomes improved among larger and health- and hospital system–owned practices that implemented these operational changes.” Little things.
  • OPM released today a corrected version of Benefits Administration Letter No. 21-802, dated May 20, 2021, “which provides guidance on the OPM implementation of FSAFEDS Program flexibilities offered under the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021 and accompanying law and guidance.”
  • MedPage Today posts a transcript of an interesting podcast in which “Vinay Prasad, MD, MPH, breaks down a new study that examined differences in breast cancer screenings before and during the COVID-19 pandemic overall, and among sociodemographic population groups.
  • The Internal Revenue Service released draft 2021 Forms 1095-B and 1095-C which health plans and employers respectively use to report individual health coverage information to the Service.
  • Healthcare Dive reports that “The finances of U.S. hospitals continue to improve as the coronavirus pandemic wanes, following months of steep losses last year, according to a new report from Kaufman Hall. In April, hospital margins, volumes and revenues were up across most performance metrics year to date and year over year, though they were down compared to March, the consultancy found. Researchers called the results ‘encouraging,’ but noted they were more indicative of a recovering industry following the record-low performance seen in the first two months of COVID-19 in 2020, rather than strong performance overall this year.”

Thursday Miscellany

Following up on yesterday’s post about the proposed Postal Service Health Benefits Program that Congress is considering, here is a link to the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee’s press release on its companion bill to the House measure (HR 3706). The press release provides a link to the Senate bill for those interested.

The Office of Personnel Management issued a benefit administration letter to federal agencies “which provides guidance on the OPM implementation of FSAFEDS Program flexibilities offered under the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021 and accompanying law and guidance.”

From the COVID-19 front, the American Hospital Association reports

FDA authorizes storing thawed Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in refrigerator for up to 30 days before diluting. The Food and Drug Administration yesterday authorized storing thawed, undiluted vials of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine at refrigerator temperatures (35°F to 46°F) for up to 30 days after the company submitted data showing the vials can remain stable that long, up from the previously authorized five days. For details, see the updated fact sheet for health care providers administering the vaccine.
Peter Marks, M.D., director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, said the change should make it easier for vaccine providers such as doctors’ offices to administer the vaccine.
Once the thawed vials are diluted, providers must use them within six hours, a potential challenge for clinicians who lack sufficient demand for the vaccine during regular office visits.

That’s quite a conundrum. On the brighter side, Politico informs us

Emergent BioSolutions could resume manufacturing Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine within days, CEO Robert Kramer told a House [of Representatives] panel Wednesday. Restarting Emergent’s production of the J&J shot would revitalize efforts to get the single-dose vaccine to many Americans. The United States is currently relying entirely on vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna for its vaccination efforts; for the second straight week, the White House on Tuesday told state officials that the J&J vaccine was not available to order.

The American Medical Association adds that “The biggest impediment to getting more people fully vaccinated for COVID-19 is access, not vaccine hesitancy, according to Thomas R. Frieden, MD, MPH, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention during the Obama administration.” “We can make a lot of progress by making vaccination more convenient,” said Dr. Frieden, CEO of Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative to prevent epidemics and cardiovascular disease. “That’s really important. That means walk-in hours. That means easy locations, easy hours, supporting transportation and setting up pop-up sites outside of everywhere, from ballgames to bars to bowling alleys to shopping centers. We need to make it the default choice, basically, to get a vaccine.”

In healthcare business news,

  • Healthcare Dive lets us know that “Anthem and Epic on Wednesday announced a collaboration expanding bidirectional data exchange, in a bid to streamline administrative process like prior authorizations, a frequently cited pain point for providers, and give providers more real-time data on patient behaviors like medication adherence. The partnership will integrate Epic’s payer platform into Anthem’s operating system. The Indianapolis-based payer will also combine Epic’s information with other sources such as claims logs, health information exchanges and lab companies. Providers will also be notified of significant health events, such as when a patient is discharged, in an effort to improve follow-up care.” Awesome!
  • Fierce Healthcare reports that “While its joint venture with Amazon and Berkshire Hathaway, Haven, is no more, JPMorgan Chase is launching a new effort to address the cost and efficiency of employer-sponsored healthcare. Morgan Health will serve as a new business arm within the company that’s focused on these issues, the financial giant announced Thursday. Dan Mendelson will serve as CEO of Morgan Helth and report to Peter Scher, vice president of JPMorgan Chase. Mendelson is the founder and former CEO of Avalere Health.”

In healthcare news

  • The Associated Press informs us that “Screening and the HPV vaccine have led to drops in cervical cancers over the last two decades in the U.S., a new study finds, but the gains are offset by a rise in other tumors caused by the [HPV] virus. In the U.S., the HPV vaccine has been recommended since 2006 for girls at age 11 or 12, and since 2011 for boys the same age, and catch-up shots are recommended for anyone through age 26 who hasn’t been vaccinated. Experts agree it will take years to see the true impact because it can take decades for a chronic HPV infection to turn into cancer. What’s driving the HPV cancer trends is the youthful sexual behavior of baby boomers before the vaccine was out. The vaccine works best when given at younger ages before people are exposed to HPV through sexual activity, so it arrived too late for the boomers.
  • The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association reports that “Black women under the age of 24 are more likely to experience severe childbirth complications than white women over the age of 35 – an age group usually considered high risk, according to new data from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA). Data shows the rates of childbirth complications have been increasing for women of color. In the last two years, the rate of Hispanic women with severe childbirth complications increased 19%. “There is an urgent maternal health crisis in our country,” said Kim Keck, president and CEO of BCBSA. “It is unconscionable that women of color face a greater risk of childbirth complications compared to white women. We must confront health disparities across the board to change the trajectory.” Amen to that.

Postal Reform Update and More

The Washington Post reports today that

A bipartisan group of senators [led by the Chair and Ranking Member of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee] introduced legislation Wednesday to lift significant financial burdens off the ailing U.S. Postal Service while tightening accountability requirements for mail delivery, a major stride for an agency that has tussled with its balance sheet and reputation for the better part of a year. The bill, identical to a version that has advanced in the House [H.R. 3706], would repeal $5 billion a year in mandatory retiree health-care expenses and require future postal retirees to enroll in Medicare[ via a Postal Service Health Benefits Program (“PSHBP’) within the FEHB Program]. Advocates say the measures would save the agency $30 billion over the next decade.

FedSmith recapitulates the key aspects of the PSHBP provisions in the House bill for us. FedSmith also helpfully shares NARFE’s comments on the House bill. However, FedSmith concludes that “What is not mentioned in the [House] bill, but a possibility that could impact the rest of the federal workforce is the possibility that this “reform” package could become just the first step in removing federal retirees from the FEHB.”

With all due respect to FedSmith, OPM, and presumably Congress, knows full well that removing retirees from the FEHB would discourage federal employees from opting for long term employment with the government. Currently, if a federal employee has at least five years of FEHB coverage preceding their civil service retirement, they carry FEHB coverage into retirement with the full government contribution.

FEHB coverage tops any Medicare supplement plan out there by a long shot. What’s more the dirty little secret of Medicare is that federal law does not prohibit Medicare supplement plans to impose pre-existing condition limitations on prospective members except when an individual becomes first eligible for Medicare. (Only four northeast states prohibit that practice.) For example, the FEHBlog lives in Maryland which allows Medicare supplement plans to impose pre-existing condition limitations. If the FEHBlog had picked a Medicare Advantage plan initially and later wanted to switch to traditional Medicare, his selection of Medicare supplement plans would be limited particularly he had encountered health problems.

In any event, annuitants with primary Medicare coverage are good FEHB risks who help control premiums for everyone. For those reasons, the FEHBlog does not foresee annuitants being removed from the FEHB. He would like to see OPM permit FEHB carriers to offer Medicare Part D prescription drug plan integration in their “traditional” plans because that Part D integration and not the Part A and B integration will generate the greatest savings for the PSHBP carriers. Congress already opened the door the FEHB integration with Medicare Part D In the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 which created Part D.

Here are some other nuggets of interest:

  • Reg Jones continues his series on federal employee benefits in FedWeek. This week’s article concerns opportunities to enroll in or change coverage in federal employee benefit programs upon marriage.
  • The National Committee for Quality Assurance takes us on a trip along the road to health equity.
  • Healthcare Dive reports that “CommonSpirit Health and Essentia Health have called off a deal for Essentia to acquire 14 CommonSpirit facilities in North Dakota and Minnesota, the two Catholic systems announced Tuesday.”

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

The FEHBlog had been wondering what was going on with the Postal Reform bill that includes a new Postal Service Health Benefits Program. It turns out that the House Oversight and Reform Committee plans to mark up the latest draft of that bill on Thursday morning. The FEHBlog plans to tune in for this meeting.

In health equity developments —

  • The Wall Street Journal reports that “Ride-sharing companies Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. will make all rides to and from vaccination sites free until July 4 under a new partnership with the White House. * * * While the companies were already providing free or discounted rides in some circumstances, the rides will now be free to anyone in the U.S. who is going to a vaccination site to get the shot, and Lyft and Uber will promote the rides to and from tens of thousands of vaccination sites through their apps. The feature will launch in the next two weeks and run until July 4.”
  • Health Leaders Media informs us about Horizon Blue Cross’s ongoing efforts to advance health equity in New Jersey in cooperation with healthcare and community organizations as well as solid data.
  • The American Medical Association released a “strategic plan to embed racial justice and advance health equity.” “With the input of many both inside and outside of AMA, this strategic plan serves as a three-year roadmap to plant the initial seeds for action and accountability to embed racial justice and advance health equity for years to come.”

In regulatory developments –

  • Professor Katie Keith in the Health Affairs blog provides background on yesterday HHS decision to “interpret Section 1557 and Title IX, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, to include discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.”
  • Fierce Healthcare reports that “The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has sent its first wave of warning letters out to hospitals breaking federal rules requiring them to disclose payer-negotiated prices, a spokesperson for the agency confirmed.”
  • Healthcare Dives discusses healthcare organization comments to HHS’s Office for Civil Rights on its proposed rule that would make generally helpful adjustments to the HIPAA Privacy Rule, in the FEHBlog’s opinion.

Miscellaneous tidbits —

  • Reg Jones discusses the Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Program in FedWeek.
  • The Society for Human Resources Management writes about “Supporting Mental Health in the Post-Pandemic Workplace.”
  • Health Payer Intelligence discusses Blue Cross of North Carolina’s successful effort to consolidate member experience data from across the company to boost member satisfaction.

Thursday Miscellany

Photo by Mel on Unsplash

Today the U.S. Office of Personnel Management released guidance to federal agencies on American Rescue Plan Act “provisions authorizing emergency paid leave (EPL) for covered Federal employees in specified qualifying circumstances through special funds.” The Federal News Network offers information on how federal employees can apply for EPL.

From the COVID-19 front, the Wall Street Journal reports that Astra-Zeneca now expects to file an emergency use application for its COVID-19 vaccine with the Food and Drug Administration in the middle of next month.

“One especially time-consuming task has been compiling British data from almost four months of vaccinations in the U.K., including efficacy, virus-transmission and safety statistics, people close to the process say. That has added to the complexity of AstraZeneca’s submission and is expected to lengthen any FDA review. Other shots that the FDA has authorized had large-scale human trial data but little or none from real-world rollouts outside of controlled studies.”

No good deed, etc.

From the patients safety front, the Leapfrog Group released its Spring 2021 hospital safety grades yesterday. The two hospitals closest in proximity to the FEHBlog’s residence are graded A and B. Beckers Hospital Review helpfully points out the 27 hospitals with straight A scores and F scores. Meanwhile, Healthcare Finance reports that

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on Wednesday released the overall hospital quality star ratings that now include new methodology in five measure groups.

CMS rated over 4,500 hospitals from one to five stars, with five representing the highest quality rating.

Of 4,586 hospitals, 13.5%, or 455 hospitals, received five stars; 988 received four stars; 1,018 received three stars; 690 received two stars; and 204 received one star.

For more than a quarter of hospitals, 1,181, no information was available.

This compares to January 2020 data, when of the 5,340 hospitals listed, 396 received five stars; 1,132 received four stars; 1,108 got three stars; 710 received two stars; and 226 got one star. Another 1,761 had no rating information available.

Furthermore, the Centers for Disease Control released a new study setting a “Baseline to Measure Quality of Antibiotic Prescribing in U.S. Hospitals.”

Since 2015, when the prescribing data were collected, CDC has been working diligently with partners like the American Hospital Association and others to implement stewardship efforts and programs in acute care.

CDC will continue building on this progress and important work in the coming years as a part of the newly released Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria National Action Plan. Good luck with that effort.

In healthcare business news:

  • Healthcare Dive informs us that ” Virtual care powerhouse Teladoc reported a wider-than-expected net loss in the first quarter, but beat Wall Street estimates on revenue with a topline of $454 million, up 151% year over year, driven by growth in specialty offerings and multi-product contracts. * * * CEO Jason Gorevic contended he is unworried about mounting competition in the lucrative telehealth space, banking the company’s heft and variety of clinical services will fend off entrenched rivals and new entrants like Amazon.”
  • Fierce Healthcare advises “Do not expect the Biden administration to pull away from price transparency even though the administration wants to pull a requirement for hospitals to post Medicare Advantage rates, experts say. The proposal included in a hospital inpatient payment rule released late Tuesday is more aimed at easing administrative burdens for hospitals still struggling due to the pandemic, several experts said. “The repeal of this requirement more falls into the bucket of easing hospitals’ burden as opposed to the agency’s stance on hospital price transparency,” said Caitlin Sheetz, head of analytics and a director for the consulting firm ADVI, in an interview with Fierce Healthcare.
  • Fierce Healthcare also reports that “Anthem has completed its acquisition of home health benefits manager MyNEXUS, the insurer announced Thursday morning. MyNEXUS offers comprehensive home-based nursing management to health insurers, providing integrated clinical services to some 1.7 million Medicare Advantage beneficiaries in 20 states. The company’s platforms largely automate the visit and authorization, which allows members to access care more quickly, according to the announcement. MyNEXUS will be folded into Anthem’s Diversified business group.”

In benefit design news, Health Payer Intelligence offers a thoughtful article describing key considerations for implementing diabetes management programs.

Midweek Update

Photo by Mark Tegethoff on Unsplash

Govexec reports that at the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee’s business meeting today, the Committee advanced to the Senate floor the nominations of Kiran Ahuja to be OPM Director along party lines and the three nominations of Postal Service Governors with bipartisan margins. The FEHBlog expects these nominations to be brought to the Senate floor next month.

From the COVID-19 front:

  • The Wall Street Journal informs us that “Vaccines appear to be starting to curb new Covid-19 infections in the U.S., a breakthrough that could help people return to more normal activities as infection worries fade, public-health officials say. By Tuesday, 37.3% of U.S. adults were fully vaccinated against Covid-19, with about 2.7 million shots each day. * * * With the U.S. recently averaging at least 50,000 new daily cases, the pandemic is far from over. But the U.S. is nearing a nationwide benchmark of having 40% of adults fully vaccinated, which many public-health experts call an important threshold where vaccinations gain an upper hand over the coronavirus, based on the experience from further-along nations such as Israel.”
  • Today the Centers for Disease Control released a report on the mRNA vaccines. Here are the highlights which support the Journal’s report particularly as over 2/3s of Americans over age 65 are fully vaccinated.

Clinical trials suggest high efficacy for COVID-19 vaccines, but evaluation of vaccine effectiveness against severe outcomes in real-world settings and in populations at high risk, including older adults, is needed.

What is added by this report?

In a multistate network of U.S. hospitals during January–March 2021, receipt of Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines was 94% effective against COVID-19 hospitalization among fully vaccinated adults and 64% effective among partially vaccinated adults aged ≥65 years.

What are the implications for public health practice?

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines significantly reduce the risk for COVID-19–associated hospitalization in older adults and, in turn, might lead to commensurate reductions in post-COVID conditions and deaths.

  • The Wall Street Journal also reports that “Covid-19 tests for people to use to get quick results at home are finally becoming available to buy at pharmacies and retailers. Yet an obstacle might stand in the way of regular use: cost. * * * The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently cleared over-the-counter sales of two of these rapid at-home screening tests, one from Abbott Laboratories and another from Quidel Corp. 

Major pharmacies recently said they plan to sell a two-pack of Abbott’s test for nearly $24, while Walmart says it will charge just under $20. The price for Quidel’s test hasn’t been released, though Quidel has indicated it will be less than $30 for a pair.

“Twenty-five dollars for a Covid test, I think most people would pay that once. But would they pay it every week or every two weeks?” says Zoe McLaren, a health economist and an associate professor in the School of Public Policy at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. “It’s not designed to be a one-time cost.”

Dr. McLaren and medical-testing experts expressed hope that prices would drop if more companies get clearance to sell paper-strip tests. * * * Public-health authorities say they are glad to see the tests in stores, and the tests will be valuable tools for checking symptoms or for specific occasions, such as traveling or visiting relatives.

From the Medicare front

  • The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released yesterday a proposed fiscal year 2022 Medicare Part A inpatient prospective payment system rule. “The proposed increase in operating payment rates for general acute care hospitals paid under the IPPS that successfully participate in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program and are meaningful electronic health record (EHR) users is approximately 2.8 percent. This reflects the projected hospital market basket update of 2.5 percent reduced by a 0.2 percentage point productivity adjustment and increased by a 0.5 percentage point adjustment required by legislation.”
  • Healthcare Dive provides its perspective on the proposal which evidently was well received by the hospital industry. “[T]he American Hospital Association applaud[ed] the provision that removes the requirement that hospitals report privately negotiated rates with Medicare Advantage payers on Medicare cost reports and another that repeals market-based weight methodology for determining payments.”

On the FEHB front

  • FedSmith advises that “Federal employees facing a future with children aging out of TRICARE should consider enrolling in an FEHB policy. This is because FEHB plans provide coverage for children in the family option up to age 26. Additionally, the family FEHB premium for the employee, spouse, and children may be less than the cost of the TYA option for one individual. FEHB employees who are eligible for TRICARE and interested in having their children covered in an FEHB plan have to enroll during Open Season. Federal employees with TRICARE also need to enroll in a plan at least a year ahead of retirement for the FEHB plan to be continue in retirement.” Interesting.

On the artificial intelligence front, Forbes lists its top 50 AI companies to watch. Enjoy.

OPM Director Hearing / End of the Carrier Conference / Thursday Miscellany

The virtual OPM AHIP FEHB Carrier Conference ended today. For a good chunk of the conference, Kiran Ahuja, the President’s nominee for OPM Director contemporaneously had her confirmation hearing before the Senate Homeland and Government Security Committee. Here are the Federal Times, Govexec , and Federal News Network articles on that hearing which reportedly went smoothly for the nominee.

At the carrier conference today, the FEHBlog learned about the many things including the following:

  • The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association has released a strategy to help bring about healthcare equity. “The strategy is centered around improving racial health disparities in maternal health, behavioral health, diabetes, and cardiovascular conditions [by] “measuring racial health disparities, forming community and clinical partnerships, scaling effective programs, and influencing local and federal policy decisions.”
  • The American Pharmacists Association has produced a report on promising practices for pharmacist engagement in tobacco cessation interventions. 
  • OPM now has a list of documentation that enrollees must furnish to the employing office or the FEHB carrier to verify family member eligibility in FEHB.

Thanks OPM and AHIP for a great conference.

In Thursday Miscellany —

  • As promised here is a link to the Internal Revenue Service guidance making “tax credits [available to certain employers] for providing paid leave to employees who take time off related to COVID-19 vaccinations.
  • The AP reports on encouraging “new data reassuring for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy.”
  • The Secretary of Health and Human Services has extended the COVID-19 public health emergency for another 90 days from yesterday.
  • The American Hospital Association is touting Hospital-at-Home Innovation During COVID-19 and Beyond. “What was once a small but mighty contingent of health care systems providing “hospital-at-home” care before the pandemic has grown into a larger movement. With this model, hospitals across the country are “admitting” patients to their own homes for acute care with excellent results. As highlighted in AHA’s recent issue brief on hospital-at-home, patients receiving this care have a 20% reduction in mortality, were three times less likely to be admitted to an emergency department than usual care patients and have higher satisfaction with their care. And these results are achieved at a 25% lower cost of care.”
  • Fierce Healthcare reports that [Blue Cross licensee] Highmark Health and ChristianaCare are launching a new joint venture that aims to harness data to accelerate value-based, equitable care. The joint company, which has yet to be named, will take advantage of the strengths of both companies to drive toward more accessible and affordable care. Karen Hanlon, chief operating officer at Highmark Health, said on a call with reporters Wednesday that the venture aims to disrupt the traditional dynamic between payers and providers for greater collaboration.” Here’s hoping.
  • AHIMA reports that the ICD-10 coding authorities are considering releasing new codes for October 1, 2021 (as usual) and April 1, 2022 (special supplement.)

Monday Roundup

Photo by Sven Read on Unsplash

Mondays have tended to be good news days for COVID-19 vaccines. As of today, over 50% of Americans over age 18 have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Fierce Healthcare reports that

“CVS Pharmacy has begun stocking its virtual and in-store shelves nationwide with rapid tests for COVID-19—which can be purchased without a prescription and used by anyone regardless of whether or not they are showing symptoms—including three FDA-authorized diagnostics and sample collection kits produced by LabCorp, Ellume and Abbott.”

“Even as vaccines become more widely available, COVID-19 testing remains a critical tool to keep our communities safe,” Walgreens President John Standley said in a statement. Walgreens currently offers on-site testing at more than 5,500 of its pharmacies and plans to expand to 6,000 drive-thru sites by May, using Abbott’s ID NOW portable testing machines.

In addition, earlier this month CVS began offering COVID-19 antibody testing for $38 at 1,100 in-house clinics, using fingerstick blood samples to determine previous infections.

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management announced today that the agency

will allow [FSAFEDS] flexibilities permitted under the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021 and the American Rescue Plan Act including allowing full carryover for a health care flexible spending account (HCFSA) and Limited Expense FSA (LEX FSA); extending the grace period for a dependent care flexible spending account (DCFSA); and permitting care for dependents through age 14 for 2020 and 2021 under a DCFSA. In addition, OPM is working with our FSAFEDS contractor, Health Equity, to offer a Special Enrollment/Election Period (SEP) in the near future.  This SEP will allow participants to increase or decrease their current elections for their DCFSA and/or their HCFSA.  In addition, the SEP will allow those who did not re-enroll for 2021 during Open Season in the Fall, the opportunity to enroll in a DCFSA and/or HCFSA for 2021.  Finally, OPM will allow DCFSA participants to increase their election during the Special Election Period to the new IRS maximum of $10,500 for 2021. 

All good news.

What’s more, the Wall Street Journal reported in its Saturday essay about the U.S. airline safety revolution.

Over the past 12 years, U.S. airlines have accomplished an astonishing feat: carrying more than eight billion passengers without a fatal crash.

Such numbers were once unimaginable, even among the most optimistic safety experts. But now, pilots for domestic carriers can expect to go through an entire career without experiencing a single engine malfunction or failure. Official statistics show that in recent years, the riskiest part of any airline trip in the U.S. is when aircraft wheels are on the ground, on runways or taxiways.

The achievements stem from a sweeping safety reassessment—a virtual revolution in thinking—sparked by a small band of senior federal regulators, top industry executives and pilots-union leaders after a series of high-profile fatal crashes in the mid-1990s. To combat common industry hazards, they teamed up to launch voluntary incident reporting programs with carriers sharing data and no punishment for airlines or aviators when mistakes were uncovered.

One wonders whether this successful strategy may be transferable to other pressing safety issues, such as patient safety. In this regard, a friend of the FEHBlog suggested check this Washington Post opinion piece written by a group of psychologists titled “We instinctively add on new features and fixes. Why don’t we subtract instead?
‘Less is more’ is a hard insight to act on, it turns out.” How true.

In other healthcare news —

  • The Kaiser Family Foundation informs us that

a relatively small number and share of drugs accounted for a disproportionate share of Medicare Part B and Part D prescription drug spending in 2019 (Figure 1).

— The 250 top-selling drugs in Medicare Part D with one manufacturer and no generic or biosimilar competition (7% of all Part D covered drugs) accounted for 60% of net total Part D spending.

— The top 50 drugs covered under Medicare Part B (8.5% of all Part B covered drugs) accounted for 80% of total Part B drug spending.

Some recent proposals to lower prescription drug prices have limited the number of drugs subject to price negotiation and international reference pricing. This analysis shows that Medicare Part D and Part B spending is highly concentrated among a relatively small share of covered drugs, mainly those without generic or biosimilar competitors. Focusing drug price negotiation or reference pricing on a subset of drugs that account for a disproportionate share of spending would be an efficient use of administrative resources . . . .

  • Employee Benefits News tells us

New research from Voya shows employees have a bias against HDHPs and the reason for that is as simple as marketing.

“One of the really interesting findings that we saw from the research about why there is that bias comes down to branding, pure and simple,” says Nate Black, vice president of consumer driven health for Voya Financial. “When we replaced the high deductible health plan name and called it something more generic, the share of people choosing high deductible health plans doubled. So just the name itself can have a really significant impact on how people think about what plan they should choose.”

Sixty-three percent of the people surveyed by Voya said they would choose the plan with the lowest deductible. As part of the study Voya designed an experiment asking participants to choose between a PPO and an HDHP. The experiment was set up in a way that the HDHP was always the optimal financial choice, despite this, 65% of those surveyed still chose the PPO plan.

Communicating the long term value of plans connected with health savings accounts is quite important.

  • Here’s a link to the CDC’s website on the Johnson & Johnson vaccine pause which explains

If you received the vaccine more than three weeks ago, the risk of developing a blood clot is likely very low at this time.

If you received the vaccine within the last three weeks, your risk of developing a blood clot is also very low and that risk will decrease over time.

Contact your healthcare provider and seek medical treatment urgently if you develop any of the following symptoms: severe headache, backache, new neurologic symptoms, severe abdominal pain, shortness of breath, leg swelling, tiny red spots on the skin (petechiae), or new or easy bruising.

If you experience any adverse events after vaccination, report them to v-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

The FEHBlog enrolled in v-safe after his first Pfizer vaccination and the CDC has continued to inobtrusively check in weekly. The FEHBlog is happy to help out.