Thursday Miscellany

Medicare

Thursday Miscellany

David Ermer–ACA, Congress, COVID-19 vaccine, FDA, Medicare, Mental health care, OPM, Rx coverage, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

The Senate Finance Committee held a hearing today on “Pharmacy Benefit Managers and the Prescription Drug Supply Chain: Impact on Patients and Taxpayers.” Fierce Healthcare reports

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, said during the hearing that “this whole area is ripe for gamesmanship.” He then asked Matthew Gibbs, PharmD and Capital Rx President, what Capital Rx’s model would bring to the table that sets it apart from other players like Amazon or Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug that are aiming to shake up the traditional PBM space.

Gibbs emphasized Capital Rx’s focus on transparency, something that sets it apart in the broader market.

“Using a price index like NADAC, which is published by CMS, they actually do the survey of the pharmacies, and getting it more robust so that it’s not voluntary—today it’s a voluntary survey—and getting responses to that will lead us to the actual drug costs,” Gibbs said. “And then you can have your nuances of Costco, Mark Cuban. And the person can actually go in and look and actually be informed about the real prices once and for all. The only way is to level set.”

“We have the tools already,” he said. “We just need to employ them.”

Meanwhile, the National Council of State Legislatures discusses the wide variety of state laws being imposed on PBMs, which only complicates matters.

In Affordable Care Act New, MedPage Today reports, “A federal judge on Thursday struck down the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provision requiring all insurers to cover certain preventive services free of charge, angering the law’s supporters.” The FEHBlog won’t delve into this case now because he expects the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to promptly stay this decision.

From the Omicron and siblings front, WebMD tells us

The CDC has updated its COVID-19 booster shot guidelines to clarify that only a single dose of the latest bivalent booster is recommended at this time. 

“If you have completed your updated booster dose, you are currently up to date. There is not a recommendation to get another updated booster dose,” the CDC website now explains.

16.4% of people in the U.S. have gotten the latest booster that was released in September, CDC data shows.

MedPage Today opines on a World Health Organization “Booster Update: Here’s What They Got Right and Wrong.”

In FDA / drug development news —

  • Beckers Hospital Review reports
    • On May 9 and May 10, an FDA advisory panel will discuss whether to recommend the agency approve what could be the first over-the-counter birth control pill. 
    • The pill, a 0.075-milligram norgestrel tablet [manufactured by French drugmaker Laboratoire HRA Pharma], “is proposed for nonprescription use as a once-daily oral contraceptive to prevent pregnancy,” according to a document published March 29 on the Federal Register.
  • BioPharma Dive informs us
    • “Johnson & Johnson will stop developing its experimental vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus in an unexpected retreat from a high-profile research effort that had put the pharmaceutical giant among the leading companies seeking to win the first approval of a preventive shot.
    • “The company said Wednesday it will discontinue a 23,000-person Phase 3 trial, called Evergreen, of its RSV vaccine in adults following a review of its drug pipeline. The company does not plan to develop the shot for pregnant women or infants, a spokesperson confirmed.
    • “J&J’s pullback comes amid a restructuring of its infectious disease division, which was reported by Fierce Pharma in February. Its decision also thins the RSV vaccine competition, leaving GSK and Pfizer in the lead with shots that are currently under review by the Food and Drug Administration. Moderna is also developing an RSV vaccine and could file for approval this year.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front —

Healthcare Dive relates

  • Walgreens’ growing U.S. healthcare segment is continuing to bolster the retail health chain’s financial performance. The business, which includes value-based provider VillageMD, recorded $1.6 billion in sales in the second quarter, an increase of $1.1 billion from last year.
  • VillageMD sales were up 30%, including a boost from its recent acquisition of medical group Summit Health. Specialty pharmacy Shields Health Solutions grew sales 41%, while at-home care provider CareCentrix’s sales were up 25%.
  • Thanks in part to a jump in revenue in its healthcare segment, Walgreens’ results beat Wall Street expectations even as profit declined more than 20% amid lower COVID-19 vaccine volumes and test sales, higher salary costs, opioid litigation charges and costs associated with its $3.5 billion investment in its Summit acquisition.

and

  • Oak Street Health disclosed on Thursday that the antitrust waiting period for its planned sale to CVS Health has expired.
  • CVS and Oak Street filed the required notification forms under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act with the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission on Feb. 24. The waiting period under the HSR Act ended Monday, according to a new proxy filing from Oak Street.
  • The disclosure means the $10.6 billion deal has cleared one regulatory hurdle — companies can’t consummate mergers until the HSR waiting period expires — but regulators could still challenge the acquisition on antitrust grounds in the future.

From the healthcare studies front —

  • Bloomberg tells us the story behind a breast cancer scare. Last week, I noticed a breast cancer study report that struck the FEHBlog as overblown, and it turns out that this report is the breast cancer scare that Bloomberg discusses.
  • NBC News reports
    • “Losing weight — even if some pounds are gained back — may help your heart over the long term, according to a study published Tuesday in the journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes.
    • “The findings may be welcome news to those who have found it difficult to keep weight off and feared the risks thought to be associated with gaining weight back.
    • “In the new study, researchers analyzed data from 124 clinical trials with a total of more than 50,000 participants. They found that risk factors for heart disease and Type 2 diabetes decreased for people who lost weight through intensive behavioral programs. The diminished risk persisted for years after they were done with the programs, even if some, but not all, of the weight came back.”
    • “The whole time your weight is less than it would otherwise have been, your risk factors for heart disease are lower than they would have been,” co-author Susan Jebb, a professor of diet and population health at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, said in an email.
  • The Centers for Disease Control announced 
    • The expanded availability of opioid use disorder-related telehealth services and medications during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a lowered likelihood of fatal drug overdose among Medicare beneficiaries, according to a new study.
    • “The results of this study add to the growing research documenting the benefits of expanding the use of telehealth services for people with opioid use disorder, as well as the need to improve retention and access to medication treatment for opioid use disorder,” said lead author Christopher M. Jones, PharmD, DrPH, Director of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC. “The findings from this collaborative study also highlight the importance of working across agencies to identify successful strategies to address and get ahead of the constantly evolving overdose crisis.”

From the healthcare quality front, Beckers Hospital Review relates

CVS and Optum have struggled to integrate behavioral health into their payer-provider models, Behavioral Health Business reported.

For Optum, the challenges lie in integrating all the different IT systems from the providers the company has bought, Trip Hofer, the CEO of Optum Behavioral Health Solutions, said at the news outlet’s VALUE conference. For example, Optum in 2022 acquired Kelsey Seybold Clinic, a medical group in Houston with 500 healthcare professionals.

“Kelsey Seybold says, ‘Trip, here’s my issue. I have access problems for depression, stress and anxiety for adults.’ And I’m like, ‘Well, we have a ton of solutions for you,'” Mr. Hofer said, according to the March 27 story. “Six months later, we still can’t get it implemented because it’s like, ‘Well, how do I get data back to them?'”

Deborah Fernandez-Turner, DO, deputy chief psychiatric officer of CVS payer subsidiary Aetna, said at the conference that it’s time-consuming and complex to build behavioral health into payer-provider companies.

CVS, for instance, has started bringing mental health providers and virtual behavioral health access into its MinuteClinics, according to the story.

Keep on truckin’

The FEHBlog had planned to discuss the OPM-AHIP carrier conference in this post. However, the second day of the conference was postponed today due to a power outage affecting the webinar operations. The second day will be rescheduled, and the FEHBlog will bring readers up to date then.

Monday Roundup

David Ermer–Congress, Government Contracting, Medicare, No Surprises Act, Rx coverage, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Sven Read on Unsplash

From Capitol Hill, Politico points out that

The Senate Finance Committee will hold a hearing Thursday on the impact PBMs — the pharmaceutical middlemen that negotiate drug discounts with drugmakers and design prescription drug benefits for health plans — have on the health system.

The House Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee is also expected to look into how much value PBMs add as part of a broader discussion about fairness in the healthcare market, according to a memo shared with [Politico].

In related news, CMS “released several Prescription Drug Data Collection (RxDC) resources on the Registration for Technical Assistance Portal (REGTAP). To view the documents, click on the link next to each document title. You may already have the links in your bookmarks.”

This guidance applies to the 2022 RxDC report that health plans must submit by June 1, 2022. Health plans submitted the first RxDc report for the 2021 reporting year last January. The No Surprises Act calls for a standard June 1 submission date for the RxDC report for the previous reporting year.

CMS also announced that the public has sixty days (to May 26) to comment on the revised Reporting Instructions.

The FEHBlog recently discovered this CMS REGTAP portal. As you can see, this portal is not just for Medicare and Medicaid. The portal includes a link to get an email announcement when REGTAP changes. REGTAPs emails are handy and not overwhelming.

From the Rx coverage front —

STAT News adds an interesting perspective on last week’s Senate hearing on Moderna Covid vaccine pricing

What, [Chairman Bernie] Sanders asked [Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel], if instead of purchasing medicines after they had been developed at high prices, the government instead paid for companies’ research, enough to ensure they make a reasonable profit? Then, Sanders said, the medicines could be made available inexpensively to anyone who needed them.

Bancel, clearly baffled by what sounded a lot like the government seizing the means of pharmaceutical production, simply said it was impossible to evaluate such a plan without details.

As much as the plan sounds like socialism, in a world where substantial quantities of new medicines are purchased by government programs, Sanders’ idea is pretty close to the way defense companies work: The government pays them substantial amounts of money to develop jet fighters, satellites, and aircraft carriers. This system is certainly not cheap, but it represents an alternative to the way medicines are developed. * * *

Whether this is a good idea or not, it probably won’t happen. Because not only is Congress unlikely to fund a $200 billion-a-year effort to replace industry research on new medicines, it won’t fund a $20 billion effort to get the government in the game, either.

Beckers Hospital Review informs us

Walgreens and Village Medical have launched a new pilot program that helps patients manage new medications prescribed during their hospital stay. 

The program, launched as a pilot in Florida and Texas, helps Walgreens and Village Medical patients manage their new prescriptions and existing ones after they are discharged from a hospital, according to a March 23 release from Walgreens. 

The aim of the program is to improve patient outcomes and decrease costs associated with hospital readmissions.

From the substance use disorder front, STAT News reports

Public health workers will soon have a new tool at their disposal to thwart a spreading danger to users of illicit drugs: xylazine test strips.

The new testing kits will allow health departments, grassroots harm-reduction groups, and individual drug users to test substances for the presence of xylazine, a sedative often referred to as “tranq.”

The toxin is increasingly common in the U.S. illicit-drug supply — especially in the Philadelphia area, but increasingly in other cities, too. Xylazine, which is typically used as a sedative in veterinary settings, can cause people to stop breathing, and also often causes severe skin wounds when injected.

While helpful for public health workers, will drug users take the time to do both tests when the two potentially fatal drugs usually are combined? FEHBlog expects that a fentanyl and xylazine test strip will be on the market soon.

From the U.S. healthcare business front —

  • Hospitals strongly oppose MEDPAC’s recommendation that Medicare Part A make a low reimbursement increase for the new federal government fiscal year, while some healthcare economists support MEDPAC’s proposal.
  • Healthcare Dive tells us
    • “CVS plans to close its acquisition of home healthcare provider Signify Health on or around Wednesday, subject to certain conditions, the company announced Monday.
    • “CVS agreed to acquire Signify for $30.50 a share in cash in September in a transaction worth roughly $8 billion.
    • “That deal will close this week as long as CVS and Signify can meet or waive the remaining conditions in their merger agreement, according to CVS. A CVS spokesperson declined to share details on the remaining conditions.
  • Beckers Hospital Review notes that another well know CEO has ripped a page out of the Mark Cuban playbook.
    • “Love.Life, a health and wellness company co-founded and run by former Whole Foods CEO John Mackey, acquired Plant Based TeleHealth, a telehealth service focusing on the prevention and reversal of chronic conditions.
    • “The company will rebrand as Love.Life Telehealth. The company offers virtual visits to patients with chronic conditions and promotes healthy behaviors, according to a March 21 Love.Life news release.
    • “Patients can sign up for half-hour appointments for $175 or hourlong appointments for $350.”
    • “Love.Life is about making lasting health and vitality achievable, and acquiring Plant Based TeleHealth accelerates our ability to help more people without geographic limitations,” Mr. Mackey said. “Appointments are available now, and we’re excited to offer telehealth services as part of the comprehensive medical offering available in our physical locations, which will begin opening in 2024.”

Friday Insights

David Ermer–Congress, COVID-19, Federal employment benefits, Medicare, No Surprises Act, OPM–

From the OPM front, Federal News Efforts lays out the OPM issues raised by the House Oversight Accountability Committee, including an FEHB improper payments issue.

The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program came under scrutiny during the committee hearing. Several members pointed to a report from the Government Accountability Office showing that OPM spends about $1 billion annually on ineligible FEHB members.

Without a monitoring mechanism to identify and remove ineligible members from FEHB, GAO said these costs will keep accruing.

“GAO’s report suggests OPM has been aware of this problem for years but has consistently failed to address it effectively. As GAO recounts, OPM acknowledged the possibility of a problem when it issued regulations in 2018 allowing agencies and participating insurers to request proof of eligibility for federal employees’ family members. OPM did not, however, actually require proof of eligibility,” Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) said in a Jan. 23 letter to Ahuja.

In response to the concerns, Ahuja said during the hearing that OPM is working on creating a master enrollment index (MEI) — essentially a roster of FEHB subscribers and family members. The creation of an MEI has been in the works in OPM’s FEHB department for at least the last couple of years.

“We have been focused on this issue,” Ahuja said. “It’s a very decentralized health benefits program. We’ve been working with agencies and carriers to be able to ensure that we manage any ineligibility.”

Ahuja said the index will help clear up discrepancies in FEHB enrollment between both agencies and health carriers.

“That’s going to be a way forward,” she said.

With all due respect to the Director, the key problem is that OPM has never provided FEHB carriers with an enrollment roster that ties individuals to premiums paid for (and by) them. Until carriers can reconcile premiums with enrollment, the Master Enrollment Index remains flawed

HIPAA offers a widely used “820” electronic transaction standard for this purpose. In a perfect world, OPM would have rolled out the use of the 820 transactions to allow carriers to clean their enrollment records. It’s not too late, and doing so should be prioritized over the family member issue and centralization.

Family member eligibility is a secondary issue because 48% of FEHB enrollment is self-only, and the FEHB Program family member size averages under three people. The family member eligibility issue can be addressed with surveys based on statistical sampling rather than the entire enrollment of eligible family members.

The private sector uses the HIPAA 820, and randomized family member eligibility audits to keep enrollment records accurate.

From the CMS front, the American Hospital Association tells us that following up on U.S. District Judge Jeremy Kernodle’s February 6, 2023, revisions to the No Surprises Act’s (NSA) independent dispute resolution/arbitration rule:

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services today instructed certified independent dispute resolution entities to resume making payment determinations for disputes involving items or services furnished on or after Oct. 25, 2022. Updated guidance to disputing parties regarding disputes involving items and services furnished on or after Oct. 25, 2022 is posted here. CMS also announced that starting March 17, disputing parties will begin receiving a majority of their payment determination notices from the IDR portal, specifically from auto-reply-federalidrquestions@cms.hhs.gov. Disputing parties are advised to make note of this email address.

The FEHBlog finds it mysterious that this guidance is coming from CMS when Medicare and Medicaid are exempt from the NSA.

In other CMS news

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services will make whole health care providers impacted by lowered coinsurance on 27 Medicare Part B prescription drugs. The reduced coinsurance rates, which are required by the Inflation Reduction Act, take effect April 1 and will remain in effect through June 30. CMS in a fact sheet says it will pay impacted health care providers the difference between the full and reduced adjusted beneficiary coinsurance (in addition to their usual payment), after applying the Part B deductible and prior to sequestration, if applicable.

That’s good news because other FEHB and other plans providing secondary coverage would be picking up that cost.

In conference news, Fierce Healthcare discusses policy presentations from HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra and CMS Administrator Chiquita Brooks-Lasure at an AHIP conference and health and medtech presentations from the South by Southwest conference in Austin.

Also at the AHIP conference per MedCity News

Improving the mental health workforce shortage is one of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s top priorities right now, said Miriam Delphin-Rittmon, assistant secretary for mental health and substance use at HHS and the administrator of SAMHSA. To tackle this, the organization has several resources and grant programs in place to recruit more providers and support primary care physicians in treating mental health. 

Each of these conferences was held this week.

From the public health front, CMS’s biweekly review of its Covid statistics tells us

As we mark three years of the COVID-19 pandemic, cases, deaths, and hospitalizations have all been decreasing steadily. Much of the U.S. population has some form of immunity, either through vaccination or previous infection. In addition, CDC’s 2023 Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule now includes COVID-19 primary vaccine series and links to the latest guidance on booster dose vaccination in all populations.

The Wall Street Journal offers former CDC Director Tom Frieden view on the past three pandemic years.

The CDC’s Fluview continues to report “Seasonal influenza activity remains low nationally.”

The New York Times highlights a recent breakthrough in stroke treatment. The article reports that this breakthrough allowed John Fetterman to be a U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania. Here’s the catch.

There’s a number that floats around in medicine: It takes, on average, 17 years for a new treatment or technique, or some other form of research breakthrough, to filter down into widespread clinical practice. But the actual timeline varies widely from case to case. “What everybody’s trying to do is speed up that process,” says Dr. Sharon Straus, the director of the Knowledge Translation Program at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto. (“Knowledge translation” is one of several terms for a young, multidisciplinary field that aims to better understand and improve the medical research-to-practice pipeline.) “Some things do take off more quickly.”

That number of years is sobering. Good luck, Dr. Straus.

In FSAFeds news, the Internal Revenue Service issued FAQs addressing “whether certain costs related to nutrition, wellness, and general health are medical expenses under section 213 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) that may be paid or reimbursed under a health savings account (HSA), health flexible spending arrangement (FSA), Archer medical savings account (Archer MSA), or health reimbursement arrangement (HRA).”

Thursday Miscellany

David Ermer–ACA, CDC, CMS, COVID treatment, COVID-19, COVID-19 testing, FDA, Federal employment benefits, Medicare, No Surprises Act, Patient safety, Rx coverage, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

The Wall Street Journal reported this morning that maternal mortality cases in the U.S. spiked in 2021, rising from around 850 to 1200 nationwide. From examining Journal reader comments, the FEHBlog ran across a helpful breakdown of maternal deaths per U.S. state.  The lowest maternal death rate is in California, and the highest maternal death rate is in Louisiana.  The breakdown points out what the States with the lowest rates are doing right and what the States with the highest rates are doing to remedy the problem. Healthcare is local.

The FEHBlog also was directed to this article from the T.H. Chan public health school at Harvard:

October 21, 2022 – Women in the U.S. who are pregnant or who have recently given birth are more likely to be murdered than to die from obstetric causes—and these homicides are linked to a deadly mix of intimate partner violence and firearms, according to researchers from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Homicide deaths among pregnant women are more prevalent than deaths from hypertensive disorders, hemorrhage, or sepsis, wrote Rebecca Lawn, postdoctoral research fellow, and Karestan Koenen, professor of psychiatric epidemiology, in an October 19 editorial in the journal BMJ.

The U.S. has a higher prevalence of intimate partner violence than comparable countries, such violence is often fatal, and it frequently involves guns, Lawn and Koenen noted. They cited one study that found that, from 2009–2019, 68% of pregnancy-related homicides involved firearms. That study also found that Black women face substantially higher risk of being killed than white or Hispanic women.

I also located the CDC’s website on keeping new mothers alive.

This evening the Journal discussed why our country’s maternal mortality rate is so high.

Finally, STAT News reports that this afternoon the Centers for Disease Control announced preliminary 2022 maternal mortality figures.

Deaths of pregnant women in the U.S. fell in 2022, dropping significantly from a six-decade high during the pandemic, new data suggests.

More than 1,200 U.S. women died in 2021 during pregnancy or shortly after childbirth, according to a final tally released Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2022, there were 733 maternal deaths, according to preliminary agency data, though the final number is likely to be higher.

Officials say the 2022 maternal death rate is on track to get close to pre-pandemic levels. But that’s not great: The rate before Covid-19 was the highest it had been in decades.

The CDC counts women who die while pregnant, during childbirth, and up to 42 days after birth. Excessive bleeding, blood vessel blockages, and infections are leading causes.

Covid-19 can be particularly dangerous to pregnant women, and experts believe it was the main reason for the 2021 spike. Burned out physicians may have added to the risk by ignoring pregnant women’s worries, some advocates said.

In 2021, there were about 33 maternal deaths for every 100,000 live births. The last time the government recorded a rate that high was 1964.

What happened “isn’t that hard to explain,” said Eugene Declercq, a long-time maternal mortality researcher at Boston University. “The surge was Covid-related.”

The FEHBlog’s goal is to provide perspective on this vital issue.

From the Omicron and siblings front, MedPage Today informs us

An FDA panel recommended the agency grant full approval to nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) for treating high-risk COVID-19.

By a vote of 16-1 on Thursday, the Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee said the totality of evidence supports the traditional approval of the oral antiviral, which has been widely used since late 2021 under an emergency use authorization to reduce the risk of hospitalization or death in outpatients at risk for severe outcomes.

“Besides oxygen, Paxlovid has probably been the single most important treatment tool in this epidemic, and it continues to be,” said Richard Murphy, MD, MPH, of the White River Junction VA Medical Center in Hartford, Vermont.

The Mercer consulting firm considers employer approaches to coverage of Covid tests following the end of the public health emergency.

Employers have some important decisions to make over the next two months before the COVID Public Health Emergency (PHE) comes to an end on May 11. One is how to handle cost-sharing for PCR and other COVID tests and related services provided by a licensed healthcare or otherwise authorized provider. Under the PHE, group health plans had to cover testing received either in- or out-of-network at no cost to participants. 

We recently polled recipients of our New Shape of Work newsletter to ask whether they planned to impose cost-sharing requirements once allowed. Of the more than 1,000 readers who responded, about half indicated that their organization will  not make any change when the PHE ends:  22% will continue to cover PCR testing at 100% both in- and out-of-network, and 29% say that they require COVID testing at their worksites and provide it at no cost.  Only about a fourth (26%) will now require cost-sharing from participants even when they use an in-network facility for testing; about another fourth (23%) will add a cost-sharing requirement only for out-of-network services.   

Personally, the FEHBlog would opt for restoring a cost-sharing requirement only for out-of-network services.

From the Rx coverage front

  • STAT News tells us, “Following the lead of its rivals, Sanofi will cut the price of its most widely prescribed insulin in the U.S. by 78% and also place a $35 cap on out-of-pocket costs for commercially insured patients who take the treatment, which is called Lantus. The moves will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2024.”
  • The Mercer consulting firm offers its perspective on coverage of the new era of weight loss drugs, e.g., Ozempic.

For plans covering weight-loss medications, adding prior authorization criteria can help manage cost growth. These include requirements such as a certain body mass index (BMI), co-morbid conditions, enrollment in a behavior modification program, and/or reduced calorie diet. Upon initiation of therapy, patients and clinicians should partner to create a comprehensive plan to achieve goals and use the medication purposefully alongside a targeted and managed lifestyle program. The plan should include a discussion regarding medication discontinuation when/if goals are met to prevent relapse and weight regain/ weight cycling. Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) with a registered dietitian should be covered; ideally 14 in-person or telenutrition sessions.

Cognitive-behavioral therapy, self-monitoring, motivational interviewing, structured meal plans, portion control and goal setting are recommended interventions. Ideally, patients would progress from dietary intervention (covered MNT or weight management solution), to weight loss medications, and then, potentially, to bariatric surgery.  

In recognition of Patient Safety Awareness Week, the Partnership to Fight Infectious Disease announced, making March 18 a day of action to raise awareness of the need to #squashsuperbugs so that we can all do our part to prepare and perhaps even prevent a future pandemic due to antibiotic resistance.

From the No Surprises Act front, Fierce Healthcare reports

An “astronomical” number of surprise billing arbitration dispute cases is impacting the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a top agency official said.

Education and communication are integral to an “orderly transition” in the handling of independent dispute resolutions for out-of-pocket charges, the official said. The agency has grappled with legal issues and implementation hiccups surrounding a controversial process for settling feuds between payers and providers on out-of-network charges.

“We are seeing more than expected number of disputes getting to that last stopgap part, which is the independent dispute resolution part,” said Ellen Montz, director of CMS’ Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight. Montz spoke during a session Wednesday at the AHIP Medicare, Medicaid, Duals & Commercial Markets Forum in Washington, D.C. 

The agency is also seeing a lot of ineligible cases that don’t qualify for the dispute resolution process, which requires a third party to choose between out-of-network charges submitted by the payer and provider. 

These ineligible cases require “a lot of casework, phone calls and back and forth to determine eligibility,” Montz said. 

From the Medicare front, Healthcare Dive tells us

The group that advises Congress on Medicare policy is recommending updating base physician payment rates by 1.45% for 2024, according to its annual March report out Wednesday.

The Medicare Advisory Payment Commission, or MedPAC, did not make recommendations for ambulatory surgery center payment updates or for Medicare Advantage plans.

The commission did note concern with MA plan coding intensity, and said Medicare now spends more on MA enrollees than it would have spent had those enrollees remained in fee-for-service plans.

The FEHBlog doubts that this MedPAC report made anyone happy.

From the federal employee benefits front, FedWeek reminds folks that while the dependent care flexible spending accounts available to federal employees typically are used for child care, they also can be used for senior care in certain circumstances.

Midweek update

David Ermer–CMS, Federal employment benefits, Medicare, OPM, Rx coverage, U.S. Healthcare–

From the federal employment front, Govexec tells us

The Biden administration is looking to add 82,000 employees in fiscal 2024, a 3.6% increase that would bring civilian federal rolls to their highest levels since World War II. 

Nearly every federal agency would receive a funding boost in President Biden’s fiscal 2024 budget, and all but one major agency is anticipating adding staff as a result. Some of the hiring is still aimed at making up for losses sustained during Obama-era budget caps and Trump-era targeted reductions, though much of it is for implementing major new initiatives Biden has ushered into law like the Inflation Reduction Act and the bipartisan infrastructure measure Congress approved in 2021.

“As we release the President’s FY 2024 Budget, we are proud of the mission-driven investments it makes in the federal government’s most important asset—our people,” Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director for Management Jason Miller and Office of Personnel Management Director Kiran Ahuja said in a [Performance.gov] blog post Monday. 

From the end of the public health emergency front, Health Payer Intelligence reports

In most states, beneficiaries who lose Medicaid coverage when the public health emergency ends are likely to transition into employer-sponsored health plans, according to a study funded by AHIP from NORC at the University of Chicago (NORC).

NORC used the Urban Institute’s public health emergency Medicaid coverage loss estimates and historic data from the Current Population Survey (CPS) Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC).

The researchers recategorized the data, taking into account respondents’ coverage type in year one and year two of the transition, supplementing data for smaller states, and applying a hierarchy of coverage types to distribute respondents with multiple coverage sources. When respondents had multiple coverage types, the researchers prioritized first employer-sponsored coverage, then uninsurance, CHIP, nongroup coverage, and other public coverage, respectively.

When the researchers blended these two data sources, the study found that individuals who lose their Medicaid coverage after the end of the public health emergency will transition into employer-sponsored health plans in most states.

More than half of the beneficiaries who lose Medicaid coverage will transition to employer-sponsored health plan coverage in every state except for Georgia (48.9 percent), according to the dashboard associated with the report. The state with the highest share of beneficiaries going into employer-sponsored health plans after the public health emergency was Delaware (57.1 percent).

Because FEHB-eligible annuitants and family members must be on Medicaid, OPM may want to consider sharing information with federal agencies about how this cohort can shift from Medicaid to FEHB and when to apply.

From the Medicare front —

  • CMS today trumpeted that Medicare Part D members can receive vaccinations without cost sharing. CMS doesn’t mention that commercial plans, including FEHB plans, have offered this opportunity under the Affordable Care Act since 2011. For example, the FEHBlog received a shingles vaccination with no-sharing (in-network) before he went on Medicare (because his company has under 20 employees). He got hit with a $400 Medicare Part D copay when he received the updated shingles shots in 2019. Better late than never because the FEHBlog needs a TDap booster next year.
    • While Congress emptied this bowl of wrong, Medicare beneficiaries still face a pre-existing condition limitation (except in certain states) if they try to enroll in a Medicare supplement plan after the first opportunity.
  • CMS announced “27 prescription drugs for which Part B beneficiary coinsurances may be lower from April 1 – June 30, 2023. Thanks to President Biden’s new law to lower prescription drug costs, some people with Medicare who take these drugs may save between $2 and $390 per average dose starting April 1, depending on their individual coverage.” One CMS fact sheet explains how this program works, and another CMS fact sheet lists the 27 drugs, which include Humira. This will reduce FEHB Program spending as a secondary payer for annuitant and eligible family members with primary Part B. In the FEHBlog’s opinion, this program will not generate a dollar-for-dollar cost shift from Medicare to the FEHB cohort without primary Part B due to how the new program is structured.
  • Looking forward, CMS released its “Initial Guidance for Historic Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program for Price Applicability Year 2026.” Thanks to OPM’s decision to allow FEHB plans to offer Part D EGWPs in 2024, the FEHB will be advantaged by the Part D savings.

From the public health front, the Alzheimers Association issued

Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures, an annual report released by the Alzheimer’s Association, reveals the burden of Alzheimer’s and dementia on individuals, caregivers, government and the nation’s health care system.

The accompanying special report, The Patient Journey in an Era of New Treatments, examines the importance of conversations about memory at the earliest point of concern, as well as a knowledgeable, accessible care team to diagnose, monitor disease progression and treat when appropriate. This is especially true now, in an era when treatments that change the underlying biology of Alzheimer’s are available.

From the miscellany department –

  • Forbes informs us that “the U.S. government is suing Rite Aid — accusing the drugstore chain of “knowingly” filling unlawful prescriptions for controlled substances — only adds to the financial and operational woes of the embattled drugstore chain.”
  • AHIP has added details to the March 29-30 OPM AHIP FEHB Carrier Conference agenda.
  • The Wall Street Journal reports on yesterday’s abortion pill hearing before a federal judge in Amarillo, Texas. “A federal judge on Wednesday questioned the government about its approval of a medication used in more than half of the abortions in the U.S. but also asked whether there was any precedent for a court blocking sales of a drug long after it had been allowed on the market.” The FEHBlog expects the Court to rule in the federal government’s favor because no such precedent exists.  
  • Beckers Hospital Review tells us

A ChatGPT update released March 14 has been stunning physicians with its ability to deliver sound medical advice, The New York Times reported.

Anil Gehi, MD, a cardiologist and associate professor of medicine at Chapel Hill, N.C.-based UNC Health, described the health history of a patient, using advanced medical terminology, to the artificial intelligence chatbot and asked it how he should treat the person, according to the March 14 story.

“That is exactly how we treated the patient,” he said of ChatGPT’s answer.

Experts told the newspaper the new GPT-4 technology is more precise, accurate and descriptive than its predecessor, which OpenAI released in November. However, the chatbot is still prone to “hallucination” and making things up.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

David Ermer–CDC, CMS, Congress, COVID-19, FDA, Medicare, NIH, Rx coverage, U.S. Healthcare–

Happy Pi Day!

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

From the Omicron and siblings front —

  • The Wall Street Journal reports
    • In the three years since Covid-19 surfaced in the U.S., most Americans have been infected and are largely back to their prepandemic routines and workaday lives. 
    • Scientists, still in the dark about what the virus will do in the long term, warn it is too early to sound the all clear. Despite the success of a global effort to decode the SARS-CoV-2 virus and create vaccines and treatments to combat it, there remains uncertainty about how the virus will behave, the path of its mutations and Covid-19’s long-term effects. 
    • Covid-19 vaccines are widely available, but researchers don’t yet know enough about how the virus might change or how long immunity lasts to be certain who should get future boosters or how often. The unknowns could have public-health consequences in the years ahead, virus experts said.
    •  “A big question is how will that play out over time?” Bronwyn MacInnis said of the virus’s mutations. She is director of pathogen genomic surveillance at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, a biomedical research center in Cambridge, Mass. “Are there other tricks we have yet to see?” she said. * * *
    • “Any time someone talks about Covid, I think it’s good to start with a lot of humility,” Moderna Chief Executive Officer Stéphane Bancel said. “It’s still a new virus. So we don’t know everything.”
  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced amending “the emergency use authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent to provide for a single booster dose of the vaccine in children 6 months through 4 years of age at least 2 months after completion of primary vaccination with three doses of the monovalent (single strain) Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.”
  • Yesterday, The FDA took the following steps concerning the Johnson and Johnson (Jannsen) vaccine.
    • The Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers Administering Vaccine (Vaccination Providers) was revised to include a Warning conveying that reports of adverse events following use of the vaccine under emergency use authorization suggest increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within the period 0 through 7 days following vaccination. The Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers was also revised to include information about myocarditis and pericarditis following the administration of the Janssen COVID‑19 Vaccine. An additional revision to the Fact Sheets was made to include that facial paralysis (including Bell’s Palsy) has been reported during post-authorization use. Also, the scope of authorization for a booster dose of the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine has been revised to reflect that the vaccine may be administered as a first booster dose at least 2 months after completion of primary vaccination with an authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine. The FDA reissued the letter of authorization for the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine to revise the scope of authorization related to the administration of a booster dose and the conditions of authorization related to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reporting requirements for vaccination providers and Janssen Biotech, Inc. to include myocarditis and pericarditis.  
    • The Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine is authorized for emergency use for the prevention of COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals 18 years of age and older for whom other FDA-authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccines are not accessible or clinically appropriate and in individuals 18 years of age and older who elect to receive the Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine because they would otherwise not receive a COVID-19 vaccine. The letter of authorization and revised fact sheets are available on the FDA’s website.

From the Rx coverage front —

  • Fierce Healthcare offers its insights into why the Veterans Administration decided to offer the new Alzheimer’s Disease drug Leqembi to its patients who are eligible for the drug under the FDA’s guidance. Fierce Healthcare does not expect to CMS to follow this approach later this year. Currently, Medicare covers the drug when offered in a clinical trial, while the FDA’s approach is much broader.
  • The Wall Street Journal reports,

    • Novo Nordisk A/S is set to cut the U.S. list prices for several insulin drugs by up to 75%, the latest big drugmaker to make steep price reductions amid pressure to curb diabetes treatment costs.

    • Novo, one of the biggest sellers of insulin in the U.S. and around the world, said Tuesday it would cut the list price of its NovoLog insulin by 75% and the prices for Novolin and Levemir by 65% starting in January 2024. 

    • In addition, Novo plans to cut prices for its unbranded insulin products to match the reduced price of Novo’s corresponding brands.

  • The Centers for Disease Control issued a Vital Signs report titled “Progress Toward Eliminating HIV as a Global Public Health Threat Through Scale-Up of Antiretroviral Therapy and Health System” over the period 2004 through 2022.
    • What is already known about this topic?
    • The U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) began providing HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART) worldwide in 2004. [At that time, George W. Bush was President.} Through viral load suppression, effective ART improves health outcomes and prevents transmission.
    • What is added by this report?
    • By 2022, approximately 20 million persons with HIV infection in 54 countries received PEPFAR-supported ART (62% CDC-supported); this number represents an increase of 300-fold from 66,6550 in 2004. During 2015–2022, viral load suppression rates increased from 80% to 95% among those who received testing.
    • What are the implications for public health practice?
    • To eliminate HIV as a global public health threat, achievements must be sustained and expanded to reach all subpopulations. PEPFAR remains committed to tackling HIV while strengthening public health systems and global health security.

In recognition of Patient Safety Awareness Week, Beckers Hospital Review highlights

Healthgrades recognized 864 hospitals with its 2023 Patient Safety Excellence Awards and Outstanding Patient Experience Award. Only 83 of those hospitals received both awards. 

The dual recipients spanned 28 states. Texas had the most dual recipients with 12 honorees — including three Baylor Scott and White Health hospitals. 

From the medical research front,

  • NIH researchers compared a new genetic animal model of Down syndrome to the standard model and found the updated version to be more similar to the changes seen in humans. The new mouse model shows milder cognitive traits compared to a previously studied Down syndrome mouse model. The results of this study, published in Biological Psychiatry, may help researchers develop more precise treatments to improve learning and memory in people with Down syndrome.
  • The NIH DIrectors in his blog, explains
    • “The human brain is profoundly complex, consisting of tens of billions of neurons that form trillions of interconnections. This complex neural wiring that allows us to think, feel, move, and act is surrounded by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a dense sheet of cells and blood vessels. The BBB blocks dangerous toxins and infectious agents from entering the brain, while allowing nutrients and other essential small molecules to pass right through.
    • “This gatekeeping function helps to keep the brain healthy, but not when the barrier prevents potentially life-saving drugs from reaching aggressive, inoperable brain tumors. Now, an NIH-funded team reporting in the journal Nature Materials describes a promising new way to ferry cancer drugs across the BBB and reach disease sites [1]. While the researchers have not yet tried this new approach in people, they have some encouraging evidence from studies in mouse models of medulloblastoma, an aggressive brain cancer that’s diagnosed in hundreds of children each year.” 

Thanks, research mice.

From the healthcare costs front, the New York Times reports, “Most older cancer patients received invasive care in the last month of their lives, a new study finds. That may not be what they wanted.”

The health care system could improve end-of-life care. When palliative care is introduced soon after a diagnosis, patients have a better quality of life and less depression, a study of people with metastatic lung cancer found. Though they were less likely to undergo aggressive treatment, they survived longer.

Palliative care doctors, skilled in discussions of serious illness, are scarce in some parts of the country, however, and in outpatient practices.

Nomi Health announced today that “Diabetes costs U.S. employers approximately $245 billion a year — more than double what the entire American automotive industry is worth. * * *Employers spend more than $175 billion annually on direct medical and pharmacy costs for diabetic members, in addition to nearly $70 billion on indirect costs from employee absenteeism, reduced productivity and diabetes-related disability, the research showed.”

Additional findings from Nomi Health’s Trends in Spend Tracker research include:

  • Cost of care for diabetics is increasing twice as fast as for non-diabetics, and it’s growing at a staggering clip of nearly 20% year over year, reaching more than $20,000 average per member per year (PMPY) for employers in 2020-21.
  • A diabetes diagnosis means higher costs for patients, too, who spend about 240% more annually on medical bills and nearly 450% more on pharmacy expenses than non-diabetics.
  • The high cost of diabetes extends to the chronic conditions associated with the disease, which often cost more than the diabetes itself. Care for diabetics with ketoacidosis or kidney disease in 2020-21 cost employers 252% above the average, or $68,325 average PMPY.

This retrospective cohort analysis was conducted by Artemis — a leading benefits analytics platform acquired by Nomi Health last year

From the post-Dobbs front, Healthcare Dive relates

Senate Democrats are urging the largest retail pharmacies in the U.S. to ensure access to the abortion pill mifepristone amid ongoing confusion over legal access to the pill.

On Monday, 18 Democrats sent letters to seven of the biggest pharmacy chains in the country requesting more information about their plans to provide customers access to mifepristone — currently an open question for some chains as pressure from anti-abortion lawmakers and lawsuits target the legality of medication abortion.

Thursday Miscellany

David Ermer–CDC, Congress, COVID-19, FDA, Medicare, OPM, Rx coverage, SDOH, U.S. Healthcare–
    Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

    From our Nation’s capital, the President presented his Fiscal Year 2024 budget to Congress today. Roll Call informs us

    While spending would increase by $1.9 trillion over a decade, revenue would increase by $4.7 trillion, for over $2.8 trillion in a 10-year deficit reduction. But according to the Office of Management and Budget’s numbers, the budget shortfall would still total more than $17 trillion over the next decade even if Biden’s plans were fully implemented, which seems unlikely.

    The Wall Street Journal adds, “Biden’s budget shows the rising cost of leaving Medicare and Social Security untouched. In the President’s blueprint, the two programs plus interest consume a sharply growing share of economic output.

    and

    The President’s proposed spending and tax increases will face an unfriendly reception among Republicans in Congress, as lawmakers gear up for a fight over the debt ceiling that could come before the Sept. 30 end of the fiscal year. GOP leaders in the House have called for unspecified spending cuts as a condition of raising the federal debt limit. But the president has said he won’t negotiate over raising the debt ceiling.

    Republicans plan to release their own budget proposal in the coming months, though they haven’t agreed on a plan.

    The President will make public more budget details over the next few days. Until then, it’s worth noting that the budget includes the following healthcare proposal

    The budget proposes $11 billion for a five-year effort the White House hopes will eliminate hepatitis C in the U.S., said Dr. Francis Collins, the former National Institutes of Health director who is spearheading the initiative. Drugs to treat the disease have been on the market since 2013, but normally retail for about $24,000 per patient. 

    In related news, the American Hospital Association tells us,

    “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] today recommended screening all U.S. adults at least once in their lifetime for hepatitis B using three laboratory tests. It also expanded risk-based testing recommendations to certain populations and activities with increased risk for the hepatitis B virus.”

    The FEHBlog is unsure how this meshes with the ACA’s preventive services mandate because the current US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation is Grade B for “screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in adolescents and adults at increased risk for infection.” The CDC’s new recommendation is significantly broader.

    The Office of Personnel Management released on March 7 “a new memorandum today detailing a vision for the future of the workforce: a Federal government with a workforce that is inclusive, agile and engaged, with the right skills to enable mission delivery.”

    From the public health front —

    • The Kaiser Family Foundation notes ten numbers to mark the third anniversary of the Covid pandemic
    • The Dana Farber Cancer Institute highlights a comprehensive article about colon cancer in young adults.
    • The Food and Drug Administration “published updates to the mammography regulations to, among other things, require mammography facilities to notify patients about the density of their breasts, strengthen the FDA’s oversight and enforcement of facilities and help interpreting physicians better categorize and assess mammograms.
    • The New York Times reports, “A review of poisonings among children 5 and younger found that opioids contributed to nearly half of the deaths from 2005 to 2018, largely from accidental overdoses, according to new research. * * * The study, published on Wednesday in the journal Pediatrics, analyzed 731 poisoning-related deaths that occurred from 2005 to 2018 across 40 states.”

    From weight loss drugs front —

    • STAT News continues its reporting on obesity drugs. The latest article concerns “‘Emotional hunger’ vs. ‘hungry gut’: The attempt to subtype obesity and tailor treatments.”
    • Medscape provides the account of a physician who took the new obesity drugs, specifically Ozempic. This article is particularly worth a gander.

    From the SDOH front, Mercer Consulting lays out its latest “Must-Do Strategy: Lean in on Benefits Strategy to Support DEI Goals.”

    From the miscellany department

    • Cigna offers its insights on how to choose among virtual care, urgent care centers, and emergency rooms.
    • Beckers Hospital Review notes
      • “In a March 8 Twitter thread, the FDA acknowledged it’s aware of a potential drug supply disruption after Gurnee, Ill.-based Akorn Operating Co. closed in late February. 
      • “The FDA clarified that the ongoing shortage is of a specific albuterol inhalation solution used in nebulizers, typically in hospitals, for patients having trouble breathing, not in inhalers at the consumer level. The agency said it is working with manufacturers to ease the shortage and “reiterated that outsourcing facilities may compound the specific product.”

    Finally, following up on the FEHBlog’s message to Congress about FEHB prescription drug costs, OPM stated its position against carving out prescription drug coverage from FEHB carrier responsibilities in the agency’s FY 2018 annual financial report on page 123:

    OPM does not concur with OIG’s suggestion that OPM continue to pursue efforts towards a prescription carve-out program. The Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program is a market-based program that provides complete health benefits within each FEHB plan. The FEHB Program is not a self-funded plan and its statutory framework does not contemplate it to be the direct payer of benefits. Each FEHB Program plan offers comprehensive medical services including services provided by physicians and other health care professionals, hospital services, surgical services, prescription medications, medical supplies and devices, and mental health services. FEHB Program plans compete to offer all of these benefits in a high quality manner at the most competitive price possible.

    Carving out pharmacy benefits or any of the other services normally covered under an FEHB Program contract and administering the benefit as a separate contract or program, could undermine the fundamental market-based nature ofthe FEHB Program. It would be disruptive and could lead to a reduction in plan participation, and limit the ability of FEHB carriers to focus on comprehensively improving the health of the population. There would likely be less effective

    coordination of medical and pharmacy claims, and potentially less effective, one-size-fits-all pharmacy utilization and disease management programs. OPM is now assessing carrier performance on the basis of clinical quality measures that require tight coordination between medical and pharmacy benefits. A carved out pharmacy benefit is not consistent with or supportive of plan performance assessment, and may impair achievement of OPM’s long-term population health goals. As an example, carriers being held accountable for controlling diabetes and hypertension in the population they serve cannot do so readily if they do not have control over pharmacy benefit design and real time access to adherence data.

    To control the cost of prescription drugs, OPM works with carriers to better manage pharmacy networks, focus on drug utilization techniques, coordinate coverage of specialty drugs between the medical and pharmacy benefit, optimize the prescription drug benefit via formulary design, and implement effective cost comparison tools for members and prospective enrollees. Additionally, OPM notes that the most recent drug trend reported by FEHB carriers showed a significantly slower rate of growth compared with previous years, in line with industry trends.

    This statement continues to warm the FEHBlog’s heart.

    Happy International Women’s Day

    David Ermer–CDC, FDA, Federal employment benefits, Medicare, Mental health care, No Surprises Act, OPM, Rx coverage, SDOH, U.S. Healthcare–
    Photo by Hannah Busing on Unsplash

    The Wall Street Journal reports

    American women are staging a return to the workforce that is helping propel the economy in the face of high inflation and rising interest rates.

    Women have gained more jobs than men for four straight months, including in January’s hiring surge, pushing them to hold more than 49.8% of all nonfarm jobs. Female workers last edged higher than men on U.S. payrolls in late 2019, before the pandemic sent nearly 12 million women out of jobs, compared with 10 million men. 

    The Society for Human Resource Management offers five ways employers can reduce gender disparities at work.

    Following up on recent posts —

    • The Wall Street Journal brings us up to date on Lilly’s decision to offer its insulin products on the commercial market with a $35 copayment.
      • “Lilly comes out the winner of this saga, for now. It dealt PBMs a blow, avoided paying Medicaid rebates that were going to rise next year if its insulin products remained highly-priced, and received plaudits from President Biden. The move also complicates matters for upstarts such as Civica. But Allan Coukell, Civica’s senior vice president of public policy, says plans to introduce low-cost insulin as soon as next year are unchanged.”
    • Bloomberg offers an article on biological age testing that mentions Elysium Health, whose CEO spoke at the WSJ Health Forum on Monday.
    • Beckers Hospital Review tells us that the Amoxicillin shortage is continuing. Because Amoxicillin is one of several drug shortages, Pharma News Intelligence offers short-term and long-term management strategies to deal with them.
    • STAT News reports
      • Last week, the Food and Drug Administration issued an emergency authorization for the first at-home Covid-19 and flu combination test. The news came just days after the test’s maker, Lucira, filed for bankruptcy, blaming the FDA’s “protracted” approval process for its financial problems.
      • “Now the FDA has released a rare comment clarifying what happened during its authorization process. The new details are raising hopes among other home-test manufacturers that the FDA is becoming more flexible about its requirements for approving at-home flu test kits.”
    • Beckers Payer Issues informs us,” Providers join payers in urging CMS to halt proposed 2024 Medicare Advantage rates.” Good news for AHIP. Healthcare Dive reviews insurer and trade association comments to CMS on this topic.
    • The Wall Street Journal highlights the growing backlog of No Surprises Act arbitrations. The silver lining in this cloud is that the litigation-related backup does not impact the law’s Open Negotiation Process. Providers and payers should work to resolve qualifying payment disputes through that effective process.

    In other news

    • JAMA points out a recent CDC report documenting disparities in mental health-related emergency department care.
    • The Drug Channels blog lists the 15 largest U.S. pharmacies. (Trigger warning the link is principally a sales pitch for Drug Channels, but the information is useful.)
    • MedTech Dive informs us
      • “Abbott received U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance for what it said will be the first commercially available laboratory blood test to help evaluate traumatic brain injury (TBI), also known as concussion.
      • “The test offers a result in 18 minutes, allowing clinicians to quickly assess patients with concussion and triage them, the company said Tuesday. A negative test result can rule out the need for a CT scan, eliminating wait time at the hospital.
      • “The test runs on Abbott’s Alinity i laboratory instrument, making it widely available to U.S. hospitals, the Chicago area-based company said.”
    • NPR discusses efforts to right various healthcare debt collection wrongs:
      • “Dozens of advocates for patients and consumers, citing widespread harm caused by medical debt, are pushing the Biden administration to take more aggressive steps to protect Americans from medical bills and debt collectors.
      • “In letters to the IRS and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the groups call for new federal rules that, among other things, would prohibit debt for medically necessary care from appearing on consumer credit reports.
      • “Advocates also want the federal government to bar nonprofit hospitals from selling patient debt or denying medical care to people with past-due bills, practices that remain widespread across the U.S., KHN found.
      • “And the groups are pressing the IRS to crack down on nonprofit hospital systems that withhold financial assistance from low-income patients or make getting aid cumbersome, another common obstacle KHN documented.”

    FEHBlog message to Congress

    • FEDWeek reports
      • The House Oversight and Accountability Committee has started an investigation into the role of “pharmacy benefit managers” (PBMs), which act as a middleman between insurance carriers and pharmaceutical companies in healthcare programs, including the FEHB.
      • “Greater transparency in the PBM industry is vital to determine the impact PBM tactics are having on patients and the pharmaceutical market,” chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., wrote to OPM. He asked for copies of the PBM contracts in the program and information on how they are carried out, as well as for information on the rebates, fees, or other similar charges received by PBMs and any efforts the agency has made to recoup overpayments to them.”
      • “The use of pharmacy benefit managers has been a long-running issue in the FEHB, with prior proposals—mainly sponsored by Democrats, unsuccessfully—to limit their role or even have OPM negotiate with pharmaceutical companies directly on a program-wide basis.
      • “The inspector general’s office at OPM also has raised that issue, in a recent report saying that “the discounts and other financial terms differed significantly among carriers, with those that have higher enrollments receiving the best deals, reducing the likelihood that the FEHB is maximizing prescription drug savings.” 
      • “That report recommended that OPM conduct a study on options to hold down prescription drug costs, which account for a quarter of all spending in the FEHB. OPM agreed in principle, although it said it does not have the needed funds to conduct such a study.”
    • OPM should inform Rep. Comer that
      • The FEHB Program’s experience-rated carriers, who cover 80% of the FEHB enrollment, are subject to the country’s strictest PBM price transparency arrangement, as far as the FEHBlog knows. Congress should evaluate that system to help the legislative body decide whether transparency should be expanded to ERISA and ACA marketplace plans.
      • In the late 2010s, OPM announced in a management report that the agency agreed with carriers that the FEHB Program saves money by allowing carriers to manage medical and pharmacy benefits under OPM’s oversight. FEHB plan carrier HealthPartners offers a useful examination of carve-in vs. carve-out Rx program management topics.
      • OPM has authorized FEHB carriers to offer prescription drug plans integrated with Medicare Part D beginning in 2024. This change will rapidly reduce the FEHB Program’s prescription drug spend to commercial plan levels. It’s not magic.
      • In sum, the FEHB Program remains a model employer-sponsored health program.

    Thursday Miscellany

    David Ermer–Congress, Medicare, NCQA, Rx coverage, U.S. Healthcare–
    Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

    From Capitol Hill, the Wall Street Journal reports that “Sen. Joe Manchin, who has been a crucial vote in shaping major pieces of President Biden’s agenda, urged Democratic colleagues to hold talks with Republicans on cutting federal spending, ahead of a summer deadline to reach a deal on raising the country’s debt ceiling.”

    From the public health front —

    The Wall Street Journal informs us

    A larger share of people are being diagnosed with colorectal cancer at a younger age and at a more dangerous stage of the disease, a report showed. Doctors aren’t sure why.

    The American Cancer Society said Wednesday that about 20% of new colorectal cancer diagnoses were in patients under 55 in 2019, compared with 11% in 1995. Some 60% of new colorectal cancers in 2019 were diagnosed at advanced stages, the research and advocacy group said, compared with 52% in the mid-2000s and 57% in 1995, before screening was widespread.   

    Cases and death rates for colorectal cancer have continued a decadeslong decline overall thanks to screening, better treatments and reductions in risk factors such as smoking, the ACS report’s authors said. But the shift of the burden toward younger people and diagnoses at more advanced stages has oncologists on alert. 

    “The improvements have slowed, and they’ve slowed because of this opposite trend we’re seeing in young people,” said Kimmie Ng, director of the Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston. “More and more are getting diagnosed with cancer that might not be curable.” 

    The U.S. Preventive Serves Task Force is routinely reevaluating its 2018 grade A recommendation to screen pregnant women/persons for syphilis.

    From the medical device front —

    MedTech Dive tells us

    • The number of remote patient monitoring (RPM) reimbursement claims hit a new high in 2022, according to a report by Definitive Healthcare.
    • By November, the volume of claims across the 10 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ codes for RPM was already 27% above the total for all of 2021, adding to the growth seen since the start of 2019.
    • Cardiologists are the main users of RPM devices, with blood pressure diagnoses accounting for more than half of all claims made in 2021. Diabetes, which accounts for 16% of claims, is the next most active area.

    and

    Medicare will cover continuous glucose monitors for a broader group of patients, starting in April, according to an updated policy published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 

    The policy change included broader language and also came earlier than expected, making it a “welcome surprise,” and could double the market for the devices, J.P. Morgan analyst Robbie Marcus wrote in a research note. * * *

    In an earlier draft of coverage guidelines, CMS had suggested covering the devices for people with diabetes who take daily insulin, or who have a history of problematic hypoglycemia. Now, the policy includes people withnon-insulin treated diabetes and a history of recurrent level 2 or at least one level 3 hypoglycemic event.

    From the Rx coverage front, the Congressional Research Service issued an “In Focus” report about “Selected Issues in Pharmaceutical Drug Pricing.”

    From the healthcare quality front, NCQA posted slides and a recording from its latest Future of HEDIS webinar on February 28.

    From the U.S. healthcare business front —

    Healthcare Dive relates

    • The Cleveland Clinic reported a $1.2 billion net loss for 2022 as expenses climbed from the prior year. Expenses ticked up in every key category in 2022, including salaries and wages, supplies and pharmaceuticals, Cleveland Clinic’s latest financial report shows.    
    • Cleveland Clinic grew 2022 revenue roughly 5% to $13 billion from the prior year, but didn’t outpace expenses as costs increased nearly 14% to $12.4 billion before interest, depreciation and amortization.    
    • Investment income helped pull the Midwest provider into the red as non-operating losses totaled $1 billion.  

    and

    Oak Street Health’s losses grew in 2022 to almost $510 million as the value-based primary care company, which is pending an acquisition by CVS Health, continued to aggressively pursue growth.

    In comparison, Oak Street, which operates a network of clinics for seniors on Medicare, reported a loss of $415 million in 2021.

    The company opened 40 new centers over 2022 and ended the year with 169 facilities in 21 states, serving some 224,000 patients.

    STAT News reports

    In what may well be the latest fad in hospital consolidation, two not-for-profit health systems located across the country from one another are seeking to link up — this time, to create a system with roughly $11 billion in revenue.

    UnityPoint Health and Presbyterian Healthcare Services announced Thursday they’ve inked a letter of intent to explore a merger. Hospital mergers often involve partners in the same region so they can gain leverage with insurers, but in this case, UnityPoint is in the Midwest, whereas all nine of Presbyterian’s hospitals are several states away in New Mexico.  

    The deal illustrates not only health systems’ insatiable desire to get bigger in a tough operating environment, but their evolving strategy for doing so. Antitrust regulators have sunk deals involving partners they said would command too much market share in a given region, so hospitals are doing the next-best thing: seeking partners in far-flung states. 

    Healthcare Dive adds

    • Walmart plans to expand its network of medical centers in 2024, including a launch into two new states, as retail health giants race to build out their primary care footprints.
    • The company announced Thursday it plans to open 28 new Walmart Health centers in 2024, bringing its number of total locations to more than 75.
    • Walmart Health will open clinics in Missouri and Arizona for the first time, while deepening its presence in Texas by expanding in the Dallas area and growing into Houston, according to the announcement.

    Strap Yourself In

    David Ermer–FDA, Federal employment benefits, Medicare, No Surprises Act, Rx coverage, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–
    Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

    In the 1980s and 1990s, the Washington Post had a television critic named John Carmody who would warn readers at the beginning of his column to “strap yourselves into your breakfast nook” when he had big news. So strap yourselves in, and here goes. (The photo to the right is a rough approximation of a breakfast nook, a concept which has fallen out of style evidently.

    Over the next 18 to 24 months, according to the Wall Street Journal, Humana will withdraw from the employer health benefits market to focus on the government health programs market.

    Humana, which currently offers many FEHB HMO plans, placed the FEHB Program in the “bye-bye” employer health benefits market even though the employer is the federal government. The FEHBlog, and Congress for that matter, prefer to view the FEHB Program as part of the employer market.

    In short, Humana could have justified staying in FEHB but chose not to do so. The decision is worth pondering, particularly if you have a long-term perspective.

    In other U.S. healthcare business news —

    • Healthcare Dive reports on earnings announcements from telehealth vendors Teladoc and Amwell.
      • In related telehealth news, Forbes informs us about a “new survey out from Rock Health.”
        • “While 80% of respondents said they had used telemedicine, there were only two categories where a majority of people preferred telemedicine over in-person care: prescription refills and minor illnesses. More than 60% of people surveyed preferred in-person visits for mental health and chronic condition care, while more than 70% wanted an in-person annual wellness visit. The starkest divide was on physical therapy: 80% of people preferred in-person visits, while only 20% preferred telemedicine.”
    • Biopharma Dive reports on Moderna’s earnings announcement.
      • In other vaccine news, CNN tells us
        • “The independent vaccine advisers to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention voted unanimously Wednesday in favor of the two-dose Jynneos mpox vaccine for adults at risk of catching the disease during an outbreak.”
        • “If the CDC agrees with the committee’s recommendation, there will be a recommendation in place to give the vaccine to people who are at risk for mpox during future outbreaks.”
        • “Even as mpox cases continue to fall, the CDC is encouraging people who are at risk to get vaccinated.”

    From the preventive services front —

    • The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued for public comment a draft research plan regarding preventive interventions for perinatal depression. The public comment deadline is March 22, 2023.
    • The Mercer consulting firm offers useful observations on how employers and health plans can optimize their investments in preventive care.

    From the Rx coverage front, Beckers Hospital Review tells us that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will not change its Medicare coverage policy on Aduhelm, an Alzheimer’s Disease treatment, based on the recent FDA approval of Leqembi.

    CMS said in April 2022 that it would limit Aduhelm coverage to clinical trials only, which partly blocked the drugmaker’s efforts to sell the drug it once deemed a blockbuster. Leqembi will be subject to the same coverage plan. 

    “We recognize that these medications are a unique, new class of drugs, and we regret that the decision could not be more favorable,” CMS said in a Feb. 22 statement. “After careful review of the request and supporting documentation, we are making this decision because, as of the date of this letter, there is not yet evidence meeting the criteria for reconsideration.”

    If “any new evidence” becomes available or an amyloid-targeting Alzheimer’s drug receives traditional approval, CMS said it may reconsider its coverage decision.  

    As readers know, CMS’s Medicare coverage decision on these drugs effectively controls the market for these drugs.

    From the miscellany department

    • Affordable Care Act FAQ 57 was issued yesterday. This FAQ concerns implementation guidance for the No Surprise Act’s anti-gag clause provision.
    • FedSmith identifies five milestones toward federal retirement.
    • Kaiser Family Foundation has created federal and state litigation trackers regarding reproductive rights.