Tuesday’s Tidbits

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Fierce Healthcare reports that “Hospitals need to be on the hook for “higher leverage” safety measures if the Department of Health and Human Services’ wants its Hospital Compare website to ever be taken seriously. At present, the site–created to help patients pick the best facility for them based on various hospital statistics–is proving unhelpful for Medicare patients who need risky surgeries, according to a report published this week in the Archives of Surgery.”

CNN Money reports on the ongoing National Association of Insurance Commissioners meeting which is finalizing guidance to the Health and Human Services Secretary on implementation of the minimum medical loss ratio provisions of the Affordable Care Act. In the FEHBlog’s view, FEHB Program fee for service plans will have no problem satisfying the law’s 85% minimum loss ratio requirement for large group health plans. In any event, the ratio calculation and any resulting rebate will occur at the state level according to the guidance under consideration. The Politico Pulse is attending the conference and provides updates each morning. Once the NAIC finalizes its guidance, the HHS Secretary will prepare an interim final regulation.

The Federal Times reports about the federal government’s new anti-trust lawsuit filed against non-profit health insurer Blue Cross of Michigan. The lawsuit challenges the health insurer’s practice of negotiating so-called most favored nation pricing clauses in its hospital contracts. Blue Cross stated in a press release that 

Negotiated hospital discounts are a tool that Blue Cross uses to protect the affordability of health insurance for millions of Michiganders,” said Andrew Hetzel, BCBSM vice president for corporate communications. “Through this lawsuit, the federal government seeks to deny millions of Michigan residents the lowest cost possible when they visit the hospital.”

The American Medical Association has been pushing for this type of action.

Finally the FEHBlog wants to call to your attention the fact that OPM has refreshed its Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Program website

Weekend Update

Last week, the Justice Department noticed an appeal from the recent Massachusetts federal district court decisions holding the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional. The Defense of Marriage Act currently prohibits coverage of same sex spouses under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. The Obama Administration wants Congress to enact the Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act, which will provide full benefits to same-sex partners of federal workers. The district court has stayed enforcement of its decisions pending the outcome of the appellate process. Unless the Court of Appeals accelerates the process, an appellate decision likely will be issued next year, following the upcoming federal benefits open season.

The Segal Company, a benefits consulting firm, issued its 2011 health plan trend cost survey. According to the press release, “[t]he report also discusses strategies for managing health care costs and notes that plan sponsors will need to address new rules and requirements as mandated under the Affordable Care Act. A brief summary of how plans are responding to certain provisions of the Affordable Care Act is provided.”

Renewed cost containment efforts

The Wall Street Journal reports on renewed health insurer efforts to control medical costs through wellness programs and devices such as medical homes, accountable care organizations that team up hospitals and doctors. Insurers have been at this for a while but the poor economy and the Affordable Care Act upheaval may create leverage with health care providers

NPR reports on insurers offering “high performance” provider networks to employers.  “They come in a few different flavors:

  • Doctors or hospitals may be placed into different tiers based on the insurer’s evaluation of their cost and quality. You may have a lower copayment and deductible if you use one of the providers in the first tier that is deemed most efficient.
  • Some providers in a health plan may be designated as the high-performance group, and you may get a lower premium if you choose them as your network.”
Another Wall Street Journal article surveyed employer approaches to Affordable Care Act implementation and cost containment for the upcoming open enrollment period in the private sector (which occurs through out the country in the fall due to the IRS cafeteria plan rules).  There will be big changes for the 2011 open enrollment period but those changes will pale in comparison to the 2014 open enrollment period when the health insurance exchanges under the Affordable Care Act become operational. For example, for 2014 (or perhaps before them), large employers (meaning an employer with more than 200 employees, including the federal government) will be required to automatically enroll all full time employees in their health benefits program. The Labor Department will be writing those rules which will provide for opt out opportunities. 

Tuesday’s Tidbits

The Affordable Care Act requires employers, including the U.S. Government, to report the cost of employee health insurance on the annual W-2 form as a way to make that cost more visible to employees. The Internal Revenue Service released a draft 2011 W-2 form today — the form that will be used in January 2012 — and announced that the IRS will not enforce this requirement until the 2012 reporting year — the W-2 that will be distributed in January 2013.

The Labor Department issued two more FAQs on Affordable Care Act implementation, neither of which applies to the FEHBP.

AHIP has launched a Spotlight on Community Leadership, an online showcase of the innovative efforts of AHIP Member Organizations to improve the health and well-being of those in their communities through special outreach and service programs.

The Wall Street Journal reports that an increasing number of people are declining to pick up or purchase their filled prescription at the pharmacy. The Journal compared records from the second quarter of this year to records from 2006 before the Great Recession. However, the FEHBlog has noticed that its pharmacy has begun to refill prescriptions without being asked. That’s another change from 2006. So is it possible that the customer does not know that the prescription needs to be picked up. The Journal also reported on a new program by prescription benefit manager Express Scripts “that aims to contact people who fail to take their prescription drugs—before they actually stop.”

Weekend Update

On Friday, the Labor Department issued a set of new frequently asked questions about the regulations implementing the Affordable Care Act’s insurance market reform provisions. Most of the guidance concerns the circumstances under which a group health plan loses grandfathered status. That’s not a continuing issue for most FEHB plans because the initial regulatory guidance came out after the 2011 benefit and rate proposals had been submitted to OPM. The Q&A on rescissions confirmed the anti-rescission provision’s broad scope, while the Q&A on preventive health services provided useful guidance to FEHB plans.

The National Healthcare Anti-fraud Association, an excellent organization to which many FEHB plan carriers and the OPM Inspector General’s office belong, issued a white paper on combating health care fraud in the post-health care reform world. The organization’s press release explains “Health care fraud is both a multi-billion-dollar crime and an endangerment to public health. NHCAA’s white paper concludes that the fight against health care fraud will be enhanced if measures such as increased sharing of anti-fraud information, stronger auditing procedures and greater investment in fraud-fighting programs are adopted.”

Govexec.com reports on premium increases in the federal employee dental and vision insurance program (FEDVIP) for 2011.

The FEHBlog is hopeful that unlocking the human genome will lead to new, more effective treatments that over time will reduce health care costs. The Wall Street Journal posted an article by author Matt Ridley who writes on genomics and takes the opposite viewpoint. Mr. Ridley’s latest book is the Rational Optimist.

2011 Significant FEHBP Changes

OPM today issued its annual benefits administration letter identifying significant changes to the FEHB Program for 2011. There are two new HMOs joining the Program for 2011 and there are a number of HMOs that are either leaving the Program or modifying their service areas. Employees currently enrolled in plans that will be unavailable in 2011 must re-enroll in the upcoming Open Season for a replacement plan.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Dear FEHBlog readers, the FEHBlog apologize that the chart that I posted last night did not fit on the blog page. It looked OK in the composition box. Fortunately, I discovered the mistake earlier today, and it’s fixed now.

In the fact sheet that OPM posted about 2011 FEHB premiums on October 1, the agency remarked

OPM will soon launch a new Health Claims Data Warehouse which will become a useful tool for analyzing health services data from the FEHB plans. The warehouse will allow OPM to better understand the health of federal employees, as well as the cost and quality of care they receive. The warehouse will give OPM the ability to manage the program so that employees and tax-payers get the best value.

Today, OPM published in the Federal Register a Privacy Act system of records notice about the health claims data warehouse. Govexec.com reports that this notice has raised concerns with privacy advocates.

The Labor Department has posted on its Affordable Care Act website links to the public comments which were filed about the interim final rule implementing the Affordable Care Act’s preventive care mandate (applicable to non-grandfathered plans) and the Act’s internal claim and appeal mandate .  This mandate will be treated as the new internal claim and appeal standard for the FEHB Program in 2011.  The OPM external appeal process created by the FEHB Act and OPM regulations is unaffected by the Affordable Care Act.

Factors contributing to the 2011 FEHBP premium increases

OPM has provided the following breakdown of factors contributing to the FEHBP premium increases:

Factor Gov’t Enrollee Total Change
Average 2010 Biweekly Premium $257.04 $113.89 $370.93
Utilization, Technology & Medical Inflation $18.56 $8.11 $26.67 7.20%
Demographics (Age, Sex, etc.) $0.52 $0.23 $0.74 0.20%
Benefit Changes $1.90 $0.83 $2.73 0.70%
Enrollee Choice (Plan Movement) ($4.34) ($1.89) ($6.23) -1.70%
Reserves, Financing, etc. ($1.33) ($0.58) ($1.92) -0.50%
Other Factors $3.56 $1.55 $5.11 1.40%
Average Biweekly Change $18.86 $8.24 $27.10 7.30%
Average 2011 Biweekly Premium $275.90 $122.13 $398.03

*Totals may not add due to rounding.

While no one likes price increases, the FEHBlog thinks that this breakdown makes the 2011 increase understandable. Considering the FEHB Program’s enrollment (1/2 of the Program enrollment is annuitants, average age of employees is in the late 40s, etc.), it is surprising that the actual increase is lower than the predictions that benefit consultants are making for average premium increases in large employer groups for 2011 (as the FEHBlog has recounted).  That speaks well of OPM, the FEHB plan carriers, and the federal and postal employees and annuitants participating in the Program who clearly work together to control costs.