TGIF

TGIF

A reader of Wednesday’s FEHBlog inquired how Modern Healthcare picks the most influential people in healthcare. The answer is right here.

Govexec and FedSmith take note of the fact that yesterday was the deadline for public comment on OPM’s proposed rule extending FEHBP coverage with the full government contribution to temporary, seasonal, and intermittent employees who work on average at least 130 hours per month for at least 90 days. According to regulations.gov, OPM received 85 public comments. OPM proposed this rule in compliance with the ACA’s employer shared responsibility mandate. It is expected to be finalized effective January 1, 2015.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is at it again.  According to Government Health IT, the Task Force has given a “B” recommendation to “coverage of behavioral counseling interventions for overweight and obese individuals with at least one other cardiovascular disease risk factor.” This recommendation will require FEHB plans to offer this coverage in-netowrk with no enrollee cost sharing beginning January 1, 2016.  The article discusses certain insurer pilot projects that currently are underway.

Finally, yesterday, the IRS released draft instructions for the forms (1095-B and 1095-C) that health plans (1095-B) and large employers (1095-C) will use to make ACA required reports beginning in January 2016 in accordance with Internal Revenue Code sections 6055 and 6056. The IRS is accepting public comments on those documents for the next sixty days or so.  

Mid-week update

Modern Healthcare released its list of  top 100 most influential people in healthcare, and the FEHBlog’s not on it.  The top ten (in order) are President Obama, the Kaiser Permanente CEO, HHS Secretary Burwell, the United Healthcare CEO, CMS Administrator Tavenner, HCA’s CEO (hospitals), PhRMA’s CEO (top lobbyist!), Aetna’s CEO, Ascension Healthcare’s CEO (Catholic health system), and DaVita Healthcare’s CEO (dialysis centers).  The FEHBlog is surprised that the Labor Secretary, the Treasury Secretary, the OMB Director, and the OPM Director are not on the list.  The VA Secretary is 47.  Fun reading.

The FEHBlog noticed two articles advocating healthcare price transparency — one from the provider perspective and one from the payer perspective. It is encouraging that doctors are being asked to take cost effectiveness into account.

On the flip / discouraging side is this article from NorthJersey.com with a chilling discussion of how investors have been converting struggling non-profit hospitals to for-profit hospitals in order to take advantage of a loophole in New Jersey law that allows emergency rooms to gouge insurers.

Bayonne Medical Center wasn’t just bragging about efficiency when it posted a big digital clock on a highway billboard a few years ago to show the real-time waits in its emergency room. It wanted patients to come to its ER. Lots of patients.
It didn’t matter if the hospital was in the patient’s insurance network. On the contrary, to the businessmen who had recently purchased the medical center, those “out-of-network” patients held the key to reversing Bayonne’s fortunes.
These owners, who bought the hospital in bankruptcy, had found an unintended — and very profitable — consequence to a state regulation that was designed to protect patients with urgent medical needs. While the regulation required insurance companies to pay for emergency treatment at hospitals where their coverage wasn’t normally accepted, it did nothing to control the size of the bills the hospitals could submit to those insurers.
And that loophole enabled Bayonne, which had ended its contracts with some of the state’s largest insurers, to charge those higher out-of-network rates. The result was striking: The strategy contributed to a $17 million operational profit within two years of its 2008 takeover.

Fortunately for FEHB plans, the FEHB Act preempts such state laws and regulators, but cost curve up. In this regard, the Wall Street Journal reports on 2013 and 2014 hospital earnings here.

Kaiser Health News reports on an interesting case management service called Vital Decisions that some insurers offer seriously ill members. The program seeks to get these members more actively involved in managing their own health care.

Finally the Drug Channels blog discusses seven trends for specialty pharmacy’s bright future.

Weekend Update

Congress remains out until after Labor Day. The FEHBlog has enjoyed a very pleasant weekend with his family in Chicago.

Fedsmith has a blog entry on the upcoming Federal Benefits Open Season. Fedsmith suggests that FEHBP premium increases for 2015 will be in line with 2013 (3.4%) and this year (3.7%) because federal employees are not directly impacted by the Affordable Care Act. Au contraire, the FEHBlog is afraid. FEHB plans do have a relatively stable but aging risk pool in contrast to the new ACA plans on the exchanges. Nevertheless, the FEHBP are subject to all of the same ACA mandates as private sector health plans and the insured FEHBP plans must struggle with the ACA’s onerous health insurer fee just like the plans on exchanges. It’s a mixed bag, but on the whole, cost curve up.

The FEHBlog has been writing about rapid increases in prescription drug costs, even generics. The FEHBlog nevertheless was surprised to read in the Wall Street Journal that Walgreen’s chief financial officer has lost his job because “Walgreen hadn’t factored in, among other things, a spike in the price of some generic drugs that it sells as part of annual [Medicare Part D] contracts” and lost $1 billion in revenue forecasted for 2016. In view of the cloudy crystal ball, perhaps the FEHBlog’s hunch that Gilead Sciences’ Solvaldi pricing decision embolden the generic drug manufacturers to jack up their prices is correct. Bad precedent.

Reuters reports that the FBI has issued a warning to healthcare companies the hackers are targeting them for their protected health information.  The FBI did so in the wake of a successful attack on Community Health Systems’ network that resulted in the disclosure of millions of patient records. CHS is a Fortune 500 company that operates acute care hospitals. CHS’s breach notice states the company’s belief that

the attacker was an “Advanced Persistent Threat” group originating from China, which used highly sophisticated malware technology to attack CHSPSC’s systems.  The intruder was able to bypass the company’s security measures and successfully copy and transfer some data existing on CHSPSC’s systems. 

The FEHBlog hopes that HHS Office for Civil Rights does not hammer CHS with a multi million dollar HIPAA civil penalty as the company is cooperating with the government and even the federal government’s own systems have been hacked by these Chinese groups. Ihealthbeat discusses legislator reactions to the CHS breach.

Finally, it’s worth noting that the Bipartisan Policy Institute last week issued an interesting white paper on transitioning healthcare from volume to quality. Good luck with that.

 

Mid-week update

The FEHBlog regrets the one day delay in the mid-week update but he was on medical leave yesterday.

The 2015 government contribution for FEHBP coverage will be announced next month. Yesterday the actuarial consulting firm Towers Watson reported that U.S employers expect heath care costs to rise 4% in 2015. Bear in mind that most large employer coverage in the U.S. is self funded by the employer and therefore not subject to the ACA’s onerous health insurer fee. That fee does apply to FEHBP plans that are carried by insurance companies or HMOs and will jack the premium up a couple of extra points. Cost curve up.

In a bit of good news AIS reports that  

Although the FDA has yet to approve a product through the 351(k) biosimilar pathway, multiple follow-on drugs are working their way through the pipeline, noted Kate Keeping, senior director of biosimilars research for BioTrends Research Group at a June 30 webinar sponsored by the company.
“The United States is the only developed market to have no biosimilars, but development is ramping up,” Keeping said. As of June, 23 biosimilar products were in U.S. clinical trials, and as of April, 42 biosimilars were in development-phase meetings. According to Keeping, “Several Phase III biosimilar trials started this quarter,” including two for Herceptin (trastuzumab) biosimilars for early breast cancer, two for Humira (adalimumab) biosimilars for rheumatoid arthritis and one for Enbrel (etanercept) for RA and psoriasis.

Interestingly, the Wall Street Journal opinion page (with which the FEHBlog generally agrees) objects on free market grounds to AHIP’s and other’s criticism of Gilead Science’s $84,000 per treatment pricing decision for its biologic drug Sovaldi that cures most cases of Hepatitis C. The FEHBlog applauds this innovation. He does think that the price, which sits on top of another require drug priced at $55,000 per treatment, is just too damn high. What’s more health care is not a free market because there are government price controls to benefit DoD, the VA, Medicaid, etc. and health insurance including the FEHBP acts a a price support. Gilead never could charge $84,000 without the availability of health insurance. So it shouldn’t require more government price controls to force Gilead to haul down the pirate flag. A conscience / desire to avoid killing the golden goose would suffice. 
An interesting ACA trend has been the development of narrow networks for the ACA exchange or market place plans. The FEHBlog thought these narrow networks would never fly with people who were used to having health insurance but could work for the people without insurance for whom the exchanges were created.. Plus the narrow networks would help control costs. However, the consumer groups have hammered on the exchange plans with narrow networks. The FEHBlog noticed this LA Times article about a California lawsuit brought against Anthem over its use of narrow networks in the California exchange.  No good deed goes unpunished.

Weekend update

Congress is out of town until after Labor Day. The Hill reports that when Congress returns in September it may enact legislation to create tax free savings accounts for people with disabilities. Funding these accounts would permit disabled people to save up to $14,000 annually without threatening their eligibility for Social Security disability or Medicaid.

The Affordable Care Act treats the health insurance industry as the whipping boy of the American economy. Consequently, it’s not surprising to read this AP article querying whether or not insurers have found new ways to avoid the sick. Here’s the rub

Ending insurance discrimination against the sick was a central goal of the nation’s healthcare overhaul, but leading patient groups say that promise is being undermined by new barriers from insurers. The insurance industry responds that critics are confusing legitimate cost-control with bias.

This fall the ACA regulators are expected to issue a patient non-discrimination rule implementing ACA § 1557 that undoubtedly will side with the patient groups and put more regulatory pressure on insurers when the real problem is the ever rising cost curve.

Speaking of the cost curve, the Washington Post has one of its “iconic” two full page Sunday news articles about a motorized wheelchair and scooter scam that has been hammering Medicare for decades. The thing that puzzles the FEHBlog is why Medicare beneficiaries who don’t need a wheelchair agree to participate in this scam. Here’s the uplifting conclusion to the article

Today, even while the wheelchair scam is in decline, that same “pay and chase” system is allowing other variants of the Medicare equipment scam to thrive.
They aren’t perfect. But they work.  In Brooklyn, for instance, the next big thing is shoe inserts. Scammers bill Medicare for a $500 custom-made orthotic, according to investigators. They give the patient a $30 Dr. Scholl’s.
In Puerto Rico, the next big thing seems to be arms and legs. In one case there, two dozen companies billed Medicare for $5.3 million in prosthetic legs inside of a year. In many cases, their “patients” had no record of amputations in their medical history. Many of them didn’t even live in Puerto Rico. But Medicare paid for the legs.

If you build it, they will come.  

TGIF

Well, another week is coming to a close. The weather has been beautiful in DC. Our baseball team is in first place. Things are looking up for our football team.

Mike Causey in Federal News Radio is not upbeat about the Federal Benefits Open Season in today’s column. He laments that

Members of Congress and many
congressional staffers were moved out of the Federal
Employee Health Benefits
Program
this year. So, if somebody suggests federal (and postal) workers pay a
bigger share of future premiums, Congress — now that it no longer benefits
— is more likely to say it’s a great idea. Or to propose a voucher system
to pay premiums. 

It’s not that gloomy because Members of Congress and their official staffers can return to the FEHBP upon retirement.

A fun read is the article with 50 things to know about 5 leading payers in Becker’s Hospital Review. The first item is “Hartford, Conn.-based Aetna was founded in 1853, and Eliphalet A. Bulkeley was the company’s first president.” Now that’s a first name that you don’t find used much anymore.

The Wall Street Journal’s Pharmalot blog discusses an analysis by the Drug Channels blogger concluding that half of all generic drug sold be retailers over the past year have risen in price.

Not all of the reasons for such increases are immediately clear but, in general, [Adam] Fein [the blogger] cites shortages as a prime culprit. And shortages typically occur for different reasons – manufacturers sometimes exit at a market if profit margins are insufficient, manufacturing glitches can cause supply disruptions and FDA crackdowns on plants with production lapses have also been blamed for slowdowns

The article also explains that the median change in generic drug prices was zero because the price of the other half of generic drugs declined.  Prescription drug pricing is simply unpredictable.

Kaiser Health News has a similarly themed report about the wide range of hospital rack rates for common blood tests. “One California hospital charged $10 for a blood cholesterol test, while another hospital that ran the same test charged $10,169.”  Stunning. As Kramer said retail is for suckers, but the rack rates can be the base for negotiating the network price.

Mid-week update

OPM announced yesterday that this year’s Federal Benefits Open Season will run from Monday, November 10, 2014 through Monday, December 8, 2014.

Speaking of Open Season, the Employee Benefits Research Institute reports that while folks enrolled in traditional PPO plans are more satisfied with their coverage compared with folks enrolled consumer driven plans, the satisfaction gap is narrowing.

“As in previous years of the survey, in 2013 individuals in a CDHP or an HDHP were found to be less likely than those in a traditional plan both to recommend their health plan to friends or co-workers, and to stay with their current health plan if they had the opportunity to switch plans,” said Paul Fronstin, director of EBRI’s Health Research and Education Program. “However, the percentage of HDHP and CDHP enrollees reporting that they would be extremely or very likely to recommend their plan to friends or coworkers has been trending upward, while it has been flat among individuals with traditional coverage.”

The FEHBlog has been following the growth of medical clinics in pharmacies and retail stores. The Orange County Register reports that utilization of such urgent care centers is booming nationwide.

In a health care system beset by a shortage of primary care physicians, urgent care clinics are rapidly gaining a reputation as the place to go for quick and easy doctor visits. And even for people who have primary care doctors, the clinics offer evening and weekend services that are often more convenient than the typical doctor’s office hours.
Urgent care centers often appeal to people because of their informal, neighborhood feel.
“It’s a more friendly environment than the ER. It’s less intimidating. It’s not like going to the hospital,” says Dr. David Kim, medical director at MemorialCare’s Los Altos clinic.
The number of urgent care centers nationwide has grown 25 percent in the past four years to about 10,000, says Franz Ritucci, president of the American Academy of Urgent Care Medicine in Orlando, Fla. 

As further evidence of the boom, Forbes reports that Walmart is dipping its toes in this market. It recently opened six clinics, and it’s offering coverage to its employee health plan participants for a $4 co-payment.

The FEHBlog has been tracking the government’s investment in electronic medical records at hospitals and doctors offices. Health Data Management reports, sadly, that

Despite more than $24 billion in incentive payments to hospitals and eligible professionals who “meaningfully use” electronic health records and another $2 billion spent on interoperability standards and EHR certification, there is very little electronic information sharing among providers.  That is the conclusion of a new health policy brief from the journal Health Affairs and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation authored by Janet Marchibroda, director of the Health Innovation Initiative at the Bipartisan Policy Center.

All the more power to the Blue Cross organizations which are supporting the development of the necessary backbone or interchange for these systems. 
The Towers Watson consulting firm is reporting that U.S. employers and their health plan carriers are poised to vastly expand coverage of telemedicine consultations. Towers Watson predicts that this trend could save billions of dollars. OPM encouraged FEHB plans to offer telemedicine services in the latest call letter for benefit and rate proposals. 
Finally, Thompson Information Services reports that according to a former employee, HHS’s Office for Civil Rights which enforces the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules expects perfection in response when it investigates a HIPAA security breach. Such perfection, as the article indicates, requires advance work, e.g., policies and procedures, training. Given the multi-million dollar penalties that OCR can impose, the stake are high. 

Weekend update

Congress is on its August break.

There’s no doubt that the Affordable Care Act has spurred change in the health care industry. Of course, change is not necessarily good so that’s why the FEHBlog enjoys tracking it.

AIS provides a helpful update on bundled payment approaches that will bend the cost curve down.

Government Health IT muses about whether heathcare is ready for comsumerization. But this Kaiser Health News article about Medibid tells us that ready or not consumerization of healthcare is here. KHS explains

The four-year-old online service links patients seeking non-emergency care with doctors and facilities that offer it, much the way Priceline unites travelers and hotels. Vetting doctors is left to prospective patients: Medibid does not verify credentials but requires doctors to submit their medical license number for patients to check.

According to Medibid’s website, the company also is offering its service to employer sponsored health plans.

TGIF

Yesterday, OPM issued its final phased retirement rule. The OPM press release explains that

Employees who are eligible for Phased Retirement and want to continue working on a part-time basis may do so with the agreement of their agencies.  During Phased Retirement, an employee will receive a partial annuity and will keep accruing additional service credit toward their final annuity.  The employee will also spend 20 percent of his time in mentoring activities to facilitate the transfer of their knowledge and skills to other employees within the agency. Each agency will have the flexibility to implement the mentoring component in a way that is best for the agency and employees.

The final rule (5 C.F.R. § 831.1715(a)(1)) explains that employee whose applications for phased retirement are accepted will remain full time employees for FEHB purposes. That means that the FEHB plan remains primary to Medicare if the employee engaged in phased retirement is over 65.  OPM will begin to accept phased retirement applications on November 6, 2014.

Earlier this week, CMS released its final Medicare Part A Inpatient Payment Regulation for FY 2015 which begins on October 1, 2014. Of note, “the payment rate update to general acute care hospitals will be 1.4 percent in FY 2015,” and “[t]he maximum reduction in payments under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction program will increase from 2 to 3 percent as required by law.”

Thanks to Politico Pro, the FEHBlog stumbled across this Altarum Institute website that keep track of health care economic indicators.

Health care gained a modest 7,000 jobs in July, bringing the 2014 year-to-date monthly average down to 18,000, very close to the monthly average for all of 2013. Health care prices in June 2014 were 1.7% higher than in June 2013, but similar to the rates reported for April and May, and 0.6% higher than for the first quarter of 2014. Health spending in June 2014 grew 4.8% over June 2013, a significant increase over the 4.2% growth estimated for calendar year 2013.  

Very helpful

Finally, at the end of last month, the FEHBlog’s health plan clients dutifully paid the ACA required $2 per member bellybutton fee to support the ACA created Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The FEHBlog mused what’s happening with all that money. IHealthBeat reports that

According to Modern Healthcare, some critics have said pilot projects funded by PCORI over the last two years have not included rigorous enough trials to inform changes to the way care is delivered. For example, an opinion piece by Scott Gottlieb — a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute — published recently in Morning Consult noted that PCORI was supposed to help fill a “purported private void” of research that was not being done by the private sector to assess pressing questions about the comparative effectiveness of different treatments. However, he wrote that the $54.8 million in funding for 33 new research projects awarded last week by PCORI were “mostly trivial” and for “studies of how to do studies.”

Of course, PCORI disagrees.

Mid-week update

The ACA includes a provision which amends the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal minimum wage and overtime law administered by the Labor Department, to require large employers (in this case more than 200 employees) to automatically enroll full time employees into one of their health plans subject to the employee’s right to change that decision. The federal government, which is subject to the FLSA, obviously meets the large employer standard. Because the provision did not include an effective date, the Labor Department decided that the provision would not take effect until the Department issued regulations and no earlier than 2014 when the employer shared responsibility mandate was scheduled to take effect. The IRS delayed that mandate until 2015, and the Labor Department still has not issued implementing regulations. Kaiser Health News explains in this article that the ACA’s automatic enrollment provision is controversial and might be repealed in the lame duck session of Congress.

In the OPM call letter for 2015 benefit and rate proposals, OPM recommended that FEHBP carriers begin to use managed formularies to control prescription drug costs. In that regard, the WSJ’s Pharmalot blog reports on recently announced 2015 changes to the formularies of the two largest prescription drug managers, Express Scripts and CVS Caremark.

Speaking of drug costs, it’s worth noting the Politico report that the American Hospital Association is joining the campaign against Gilead Science’s pricing policy for its Hepatitis C drug, Sovaldi.

Finally Modern Healthcare reports that the Blue Cross organizations in California are chipping in $80 million to finance the backbone for the electronic health record systems in that state.  The insurers also will seed the backbone with claims history, hoping to encourage providers to add the real records. The backbone allows the systems that the federal government has funded to the tune of billions and billions of dollars to communicate with each other thereby allowing for example an emergency room to quickly learn about a patient’s medical history, Good move.