Thursday Miscellany

Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

From the Omicron and siblings front, the National Institutes of Health announced

As SARS-CoV-2 — the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 — continues to spread, its genetic material mutates, leading to viral variants. These changes happen most often in the virus’s spike protein, which allows the virus to attach to and invade cells.

Because most COVID-19 vaccines are targeted to the spike protein, antibodies resulting from vaccinations provide less immune protection against variants. This increases people’s risk of getting COVID-19 despite vaccination.

Researchers at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) are exploring a different idea for vaccines. Instead of focusing on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, they are studying the virus’s nucleocapsid (N) protein, which rarely mutates.1 The N protein could be the key to creating a future universal vaccine to fight emerging variants.

Fingers crossed.

In other public health news, the American Hospital Association tells us

Overall cancer death rates continued to decline between 2015 and 2019 for men, women and children and all major racial and ethnic groups, according to the latest Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer. The overall death rate fell an average 2.3% per year in men and 1.9% per year in women, led by declining rates for lung cancer and melanoma. Death rates increased in men for cancers of the pancreas, brain, bones and joints and in women for cancers of the pancreas and uterus. New cancer cases remained stable for men and children between 2014 and 2018, but increased for women, adolescents and young adults. This year’s report also highlights trends in pancreatic cancer, as well as racial and ethnic disparities in incidence and death rates. 

MedCity News points out three reasons why Americans are underutilizing primary care.

From the Federal Employee Benefits Open Season front, OPM informed agency benefit officers

Please see the attached document listing the 84 FEHB plan choices where the enrollee share of premiums for the Self Plus One enrollment type is higher than for the Self and Family enrollment type for the 2023 plan year.

Please share this information with your employees and inform them that enrollees who wish to cover one eligible family member may elect either the Self and Family or Self Plus One enrollment type.

Enrollees should carefully check the 2023 rates of their current plan and any other plan choices they are considering for 2023.  For enrollees wishing to change, they must do so during Open Season, which is held from November 14th through December 12th.

In all of these cases, the self and family premium exceeds the self plus one premium. Nevertheless, these anomalies occur because FEHB family sizes are small and the self plus one government contribution is lower than the self plus family government.

A FedWeek expert identifies eight mistakes to avoid when shopping for a health plan during the Open Season.

The Kaiser Family Foundation released its 2022 Employer Health Benefits Survey.

In 2022, the average annual premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance are $7,911 for single coverage and $22,463 for family coverage. These amounts are each similar to the average premiums in 2021. In contrast to the lack of premium growth in 2022, workers’ wages increased 6.7% and inflation increased 8%.2 This difference may be due to the fact that many of the premiums for 2022 were finalized in the fall of 2021, before the extent of rising prices became clear. As inflation continues to grow at relatively high levels, we could potentially observe a higher increase in average premiums for 2023 than we have seen in recent years.

In other federal employment news,

  • FedWeek offers federal and postal employees advice on getting a head start on planning for retirement.

More federal employees are working onsite and more often this year than last, continuing a downward trend since the mid-2020 peak in offsite work caused by the pandemic, the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey showed.

Thirty-six percent said they are present at their worksite all of the time, up from 29 percent in 2021 and 17 percent in 2020, while 18 percent said they had not been present onsite this year, down from 22 and 30 percent. The percentage who said they are onsite less than a quarter of the time fell over the three years from 24 to 20 and now 15.

While the share of full-time telework is down, many of those who are continuing to telework do so a substantial portion of their time, however. Those reporting that they telework three or four days a week now stands at 25 percent, up from 11-12 percent in the prior years, while those doing it one or two days a week stands at 17 percent, up from 8 and 10 percent.

and shares statistics on federal employee use of the new paid parental leave benefit as reported in the Federal Employees Viewpoint Survey — “Four percent of employees took at least some of that time over the last year.”

From the Affordable Care Act front, the Kaiser Family Foundation released its annually updated fact sheet on Preventive Services Covered by Private Health Plans under the ACA. “This fact sheet summarizes the federal requirements for coverage for preventive services in private plans, major updates to the requirement, and recent policy activities on this front.”

From the telehealth front —

  • Beckers Hospital Review offers an interview on the topic of “Telesitting, remote maternity care: Where telehealth is going next at Kaiser Permanente.”
  • Fierce Healthcare informs us “COVID-era emergency department patients who had follow-up appointments via telehealth more often returned to the ED or were hospitalized than those who followed up with doctors in person, according to a new retrospective study [published in JAMA Network Open]. * * * The researchers noted their investigation had several limitations, such as no data on certain “complex” social determinants of health like unemployment and whether patients received a follow-up outside of the health system. The findings “need to be considered in the context of a substantial body of science demonstrating the benefits of telemedicine,” such as those that found lower rates of rehospitalization in certain chronic condition populations tied to telehealth use.”
  • Healthcare Dive reports “Teladoc reported better than expected revenue in the third quarter, on the back of its mental health business, BetterHelp, and issued moderate fourth-quarter guidance, leading some industry watchers to say the telehealth vendor is setting itself up for achievable growth after uncertainty contributed to stock losses this year.”

In other U.S. healthcare business news

  • Politico brings us up to date on the low participation rate in the new federal designation of rural emergency hospitals. It’s back to the drawing board.
  • Beckers Payer Issues reports that CareFirst and Johns Hopkins Medicine “have signed a multiyear contract following a dispute over reimbursement rates that would have left hundreds of thousands of people out of network.” Cheers to that.
  • MedTech Dive informs us, “Labcorp lowers 2022 forecasts after Q3 profit falls on labor costs, declining COVID-19 revenue.”
  • Employers should know that the Equal Employment Opportunity slide has updated its workplace notice. HR Dive warns us, “Hang new EEO poster ‘as soon as possible,’ EEOC advises. An EEOC spokesperson also told HR Dive how employers with remote and hybrid employees should handle the poster.”

From the Rx coverage front

  • Reuters relates that “The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has delayed a meeting of its advisory panel to discuss Perrigo Co Plc’s (PRGO.N) over-the-counter (OTC) contraceptive, the drugmaker said on Wednesday. The meeting, scheduled for Nov. 18, was delayed to review additional information, and no new date has yet been set, in a setback for what was expected to be the first approved daily OTC birth control pill in the United States.”
  • STAT News calls our attention to this news

Amid sporadic shortages of a drug that is essential in preparing patients for lifesaving, cancer-fighting treatments, one manufacturer has returned to the market — but is selling its medicine for 10 to 20 times the prices offered by the only other companies with available supplies.

Over the past week, Areva Pharmaceuticals began marketing vials of fludarabine at a wholesale price of $2,736, a much steeper cost than the $272 charged for the same dosage by Fresenius Kabi and the $109 price tag from Teva Pharmaceuticals, according to data from IBM Micromedex, which gathers pricing data that is reported by manufacturers.

The move comes as hospitals around the U.S. grapple with persistent shortages of fludarabine, an older chemotherapy that is used during the run-up to bone marrow transplants in patients with a form of leukemia. More recently, the drug has also become a crucial tool in readying patients to undergo CAR-T cell therapy, a customized approach to fighting some cancers that involves re-engineering patient cells.

That’s a big bowl of wrong.

Let’s conclude with this wonderful piece of Govexec miscellany explaining the genesis of federal government shutdowns in the late 1970s.