Weekend Update

Weekend Update

Congress is now out of session until mid-September. (The Senate returned briefly last week to pass a border security measure.)

The public comment deadline passed last week on the interim final rule implementing the Affordable Care Act’s mandate to cover children up to age 26. Very few of the comments currently are posted on the regulations.gov website. The next Affordable Care Act implementing rule comment deadlines are for the grandfather plan rule (August 16) and the patient protection rules (August 27).

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners is holding its summer meeting this coming week in Seattle. Business Insurance reports today that President Obama changed his schedule and will not be speaking about Affordable Care Act implementation at that meeting.

The NAIC will be discussing Affordable Care implementation at the meeting, in particular, its  recommendations to HHS on the minimum medical loss ratio (“MLR”) now under development. Congressional leaders sent HHS Secretary Sibelius their post-enactment views on the taxes which may be excluded from the calculation.  The Congress leaders want the ratio’s denominator to include federal and state taxes that health insurers currently pay. Modern Healthcare.com reports that the NAIC group looking at the issue reached the opposite conclusion (which in my view is consistent with the express language of the law, new Public Health Service Act Section 2718). 

Tuesday’s Tidbits

The House of Representatives returned from vacation today for the purpose of passing a bill that will continue increased federal spending on State Medicaid programs. Modern Healthcare reports that the House took the anticipated action and the President signed the bill into law. The House is in adjournment until September 14.

The Office of Personnel Management released the results of its annual employee survey. This survey looks at job satisfaction, not employee benefits.

The Wall Street Journal is reporting that health insurers, including Aetna, Humana, and United Healthcare, are jumping into the “feeding frenzy” to provide healthcare providers with meaningful electronic healthcare record technology.  “It is an opportunity for insurers to diversify their operations as the federal health overhaul presents new challenges to their core business of collecting premiums and paying claims. In some cases, it is also an opportunity to link doctors more closely to systems to aid in reimbursement or disease management.”

Business Insurance reports on the results of a Hewitt Associates study that

Fifty-one percent of employers with self-funded plans expect their plans to lose grandfathered status in 2011, and 21% expect that to happen in 2012. Forty-six percent of employers with fully insured plans expect to lose grandfathered status in 2011, and 18% expect that in 2012. 

Interestingly the Hewitt press release notes that employers are opting to give up grandfathering in order to have more control over benefit design. That’s not what I expected when the law passed but it’s understandable given the strict regulatory interpretation of grandfathered plan status. The FEHB Program will likely reflect this pattern.

Weekend Update

The Senate recessed this week after confirming Elena Kagan as a Supreme Court justice and passing a bill that will provide increased Medicaid funding, among other things. The American Hospital Association is very pleased by this Medicaid development.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is calling back the House in order to send this bill to the President for signature, according to the Washington Post.

The Wall Street Journal reports that momentum is building on both sides of the aisle in Congress to repeal or water down the Affordable Health Care Act provision that will vastly expand the IRS 1099-MISC reporting obligation on businesses. The current 1099 reporting requirement generally is limited to reporting purchases of services from individuals and partnerships over $600 in a tax year. Expanded reporting is required for health plan payments to health care providers and business payments to lawyers. The Politico reports on the dueling bills that will taken up shortly after the Senate returns on September 13.

Last year, First Databank implemented a class action settlement under which it agreed to stop publishing the Average Wholesale Prices (AWP) of prescription drugs in September 2011.  AWP is the pricing benchmark that prescription benefit managers often use in their contracts with retail pharmacies and health plans. Since then stakeholders have been evaluating other benchmarks to replace AWP.  AIS Drug Business News reports that

The search to find a replacement for controversial average wholesale price (AWP) data just became a little less urgent, as one of the major drug compendia has decided it will continue publishing the pricing benchmark because of a lack of consensus on possible alternatives.

Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., publisher of the Medi-Span drug pricing database, has pledged to continue publishing AWP “until relevant industry or governmental organizations develop a viable, generally accepted alternative.” The company says that discontinuing AWP before an industrywide accepted alternative is found “could create significant customer problems and confusion or disruption” throughout the entire industry.

Mid week update

Affordable Care Act implementation grinds on. On August 5, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) offered an update on its efforts to make recommendation to the HHS Secretary on implementing the minimum medical loss ratio requirements of the new law. The MLR require the health insurers and HMOs make rebates if the percentage of premium dollars spent on benefits and quality efforts fall below 80% in the individual market and 85% in the group market, which includes the FEHB Program.

Here’s a link to the NAIC’s Affordable Care Act implementation page. (Even the IRS has an Affordable Care Act implementation page.)  Posted on that page is a lengthy, draft memorandum on the work of an NAIC actuarial workgroup that is trying to decipher the MLR provision. The NAIC plans to offers its recommendations to HHS later this month.

Belated Weekend Update

I was out of town over the weekend so I am doing the weekend update this evening.  Hey, it’s the summertime.

The House of Representatives has begun its August recess while the Senate remains in session. It takes up Elena Kagan’s Supreme Court nomination tomorrow.

Last week, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced a new prospective payment system for end stage renal disease facilities. Medicare provides coverage to people with end stage renal (kidney) disease without regard to the patient’s age. In the early 1970’s Congress decided to test expansion of Medicare coverage to catastrophic illnesses. End stage renal disease was the first and last test case because the expansion caused costs to explode as discussed in this American Society of Nephrologists journal article from 2009.  When Medicare squeezes on doctors and health care facilities, the providers shift costs to the private sector, including the FEHB Program.

Following up on last week’s Wall Street Journal article about shrinking health care expenses discussed in Thursday’s FEHBlog, Kaiser Health News reports on the growing practice of consumers to ask providers for discounts.

Healthcare IT News predicts that HHS’s withdrawal of its final rule on the HITECH Act’s nationwide requirement to provide notice of breach of unsecured protected health information (also discussed in last  Thursday’s FEHBlog) may mean the end of the current interim rule’s sensible harm standard. The harm standard means that a plan or provider does not have to alarm a person with a breach notice unless there’s a risk of financial or reputational harm to that person.

Today, a federal judge denied the federal government’s motion to dismiss the Commonwealth of Virginia’s challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s individual coverage mandate according to Business Insurance. A copy of the opinion is available here.

Open Season Dates Announced

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management announced yesterday that this year’s Federal Benefits Open Season, which runs from Monday, November 8, 2010 through Monday, December 13, 2010. The Open Season allows federal and postal employees and annuitants to select a different FEHB or FEDVIP plan or change a FedFlex option for 2011.  Beginning in 2011, the Open Season will be the month of November.

Last year, the Department of Health and Human Services issued an interim final rule implementing the HITECH Act’s nationwide notice of unsecured protected health information breach rule. HHS solicited comments on the interim final rule and on May 14, 2010, HHS submitted a “final” final rule for Office of Management and Budget review, the final step before publication in the Federal Register. Today, HHS announced today that it had withdraw that final final rule from OMB consideration.”for further consideration, given the Department’s experience to date in administering the regulations.” The FEHBlog finds this development unsettling.

The Wall Street Journal reported today that Americans are consuming less health care services. This was an objective of consumer driven health care which came into vogue about eight yeears ago when the IRS approved healthcare reimbursement arrangements. Consumer driven health care gives people a financial incentive to control their health care spending and the know how to do it through the internet and other tools. The FEHBlog finds this development encouraging.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Rite Aid Pharmacies agreed to pay $1 million to settle HHS and Federal Trade Commission complaints that the company had committed HIPAA Privacy Rule violations by dumping in the trash prescriptions and pill bottles bearing protected heath information on their labels according to this government press release.

The AMA News reports that the Health Net, a health plan now owned by United Healthcare, agreed to pay $250,000 to settle Connecticut attorney general charges that it had violated the HIPAA Privacy Rule as a result of the disappearance of a portable disk drive with protected health information.

Take aways — The federal and state governments are serious about their HIPAA enforcement efforts and the 2009 HITECH Act greatly strengthened their authority. HIPAA covered entities and business associates should be careful to encrypt portable electronic storage devices.

Yesterday, HHS clarified its guidance on submission of health plan claims to the Early Retiree Reinsurance Program established by the Affordable Care Act. HHS is not allowing the FEHB Program, which covers loads of early retirees, to participate in this Program.

Belaboring the obvious (my job as a lawyer), the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) released a report on the tremendous savings created by small molecule generic drugs. It will be interesting to see five or ten years from now whether similar claims will be made about large molecule generic drugs or bio-generics. The Affordable Care Act authorized the Food and Drug Administration to create a regulatory pathway for approval of bio-generics. It’s interesting to note that the GPhA found the ACA’s provision inadequate. Time will tell.

Weekend Update

Last Thursday and Friday, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners committee working on Affordable Care Act implementation issues met in Washington, DC.  National Underwriter reports that the battle of the minimum medical loss ratio (“MLR”) definitions was a hot topic at the meetings.  Under the Affordable Care Act, health insurers, including those sponsoring or underwriting FEHB plans, must spend at least 85% of premiums on medical expenses and health care quality efforts.  FEHB plans generally meet this requirement. The tricky part will be how the regulators will treat plan efforts to build or re-build reserves. This requirement takes effect with the 2011 plan year.

According to National Underwriter, “America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) put out a paper listing its goals for the MLR effort. AHIP says the rules adopted should:

Ensure that existing efforts to improve quality are allowed to continue and new initiatives to support the goals of PPACA are not discouraged.

Recognize that quality improvement efforts will be advanced by ICD-10 implementation.

Include fraud prevention and detection activities in the definition of activities that improve health care quality. 

Implement a plan for transitioning from the existing state system to the new federal standards to maximize consumer choice.” 

California Healthline reports that the NAIC may complete its work next month. The NAIC will be making recommendations to the Health and Human Services Department.

Congress is now hurtling toward its August recess. The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will be holding a business meeting on Thursday. No FEHBP issues are on the agenda.

More rules

The Affordable Care Act regulators issued another rule today.  This time it was the rule implementing the Act’s requirements for internal and external disputed claim procedures.  This rule is applicable to non-grandfathered group health plans, including FEHB plans, beginning with the first plan year following September 23, 2010. Business Insurance highlights the differences between this rule and the Labor Department rules currently applicable to ERISA governed plans which Congress deemed to be the gold standard in the new law:


The key difference is that a plan must decide a disputed claim involving urgent services within 24 hours rather than 72 hours of submission as provided under the ERISA rule. The rule also sets standards on conflicts of interest and on providing notices to enrollees in “culturally and linguistically appropriate manner.”

In another interesting development, NCQA announced that it is teaming up with Consumers Union to publish NCQA’s health plan ratings in the November issue of Consumer Reports. Meanwhile, the American Medical Association is complaining about health plan efforts to profile physician quality of care according to MedPage Today.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Govexec.com is reporting that the National Community Pharmacists Association is seeking to revive H.R. 4489, a bill to more strictly regulate prescription benefit managers and prescription drug pricing in the FEHB Program.  The Association sent a letter to OPM endorsing the bill.  According to Govexec.com, “OPM spokesman Edmund Byrnes said the agency is in the process of putting together a formal response to NCPA’s recommendations.” The FEHBlog thinks that OPM’s February 2010 carrier letter on PBM arrangements effectively trumped the bill.

The Senate passed a bill today extending unemployment benefits but not extending the COBRA/TCC subsidy program beyond May 31, according to the Washington Post. That subsidy program does appear to be phasing out.

The AMA News features an interesting article on the coming struggle on Capitol Hill to fix the formula for reimbursing doctors under Medicare Part B.  Without a legislative fix, the formula will drop the reimbursement level by 23% on December 1, 2010. In mid-June, CMS implemented a similar drop for a few days when Congress dawdled with extending the fix past May 31. In the end, Congress increased the reimbursement formula by 2.2% through November 30, 2010. But Congress is finding it necessary to appropriate an additional $95 million to CMS to pay for reprocessing these claims.

On the Affordable Care Act front, reginfo.gov informs us that the Labor Department rule implementing the Act’s disputed claim process provision (PHSA Section 2719) has been pending final Office of Management and Budget review since July 16. The interim final rule implementing the Act’s preventive care mandate was published in yesterday’s Federal Register. The comment deadline is September 17, 2010.

Finally, the FEHBlog got a kick out of this Wall Street Journal article about doctor’s notes.  It reminds me of the Seinfeld episode in which Elaine is concerned about what her doctor is writing about her on his chart and she arranges for Kramer to try to steal the chart. Of course, one of the HIPAA Privacy Rule’s individual rights is the ability to review and even propose amendments to a doctor’s notes on you, but the Privacy Rule was not on the books in the 1990s.