Friday Stats and More

Friday Stats and More

This chart is based on the Centers for Disease Control’s Cases in the U.S. website for the week ending May 20th through the week ending July 23, which was a doozy in terms of new cases.

Here’s the CDC’s COVID-19 Hospitalizations Chart, which has been fairly stable since May:

The Wall Street Journal reports that

President Trump signed executive orders Friday aimed at reducing drug prices. The moves revived a signature part of his health-policy agenda before the 2020 election after his earlier efforts to combat rising prescription costs stalled.

One of the executive orders focuses on pegging the cost of drugs in the U.S. to lower drug prices overseas, and another concerns speeding imports of drugs from Canada. The pharmaceutical industry and some Republicans have criticized the first order, saying it amounts to price controls, while opponents of the second initiative say it raises questions about product safety.

Another would require community health centers to pass on negotiated discounts on insulin and epinephrine-injector devices to consumers. And a fourth would attempt to undercut “middlemen” whom Mr. Trump described as profiting from deals with drugmakers and don’t pass along discounts to consumers.

The moves are unlikely to result in immediate changes. The White House said they represent the administration’s policy and begin a rule-making process. That process can be arduous and face legal challenges.

The links inside the quote are to the Executive Orders themselves (The text of the first referenced Order on the use of international price indexing is not on whitehouse.gov yet).

Health Payer Intelligence informs us that “Over half of the public rate filings from payers on the individual and small group health insurance market are proposing 2021 premium rates changes between a two percent decrease and a six percent increase, according to Kaiser Family Foundation.” For more details, check out the KFF report.

Thursday Miscellany

Modern Healthcare reports this evening that Health and Human Services (“HHS”) Secretary Alex Azar has signed a 90 day extension of the COVID-19 national health emergency. The current emergency period was otherwise set to expire on Saturday July 25. Modern Healthcare explains that

The renewal gives the healthcare industry certainty through the fall on several key policies to assist with the COVID-19 response. Some notable policies tied to the public health emergency are the 20% Medicare inpatient add-on payment for COVID-19 patients, increased federal Medicaid matching funds for states, a mandate that insurers cover medically necessary COVID-19 tests without cost-sharing, relaxed telehealth restrictions, and Section 1135 waivers that give providers additional flexibility to respond to COVID-19.

In other news,

  • Aetna is rolling out two new benefit design offerings for employer sponsored health plans per Fierce Healthcare.

The new designs, called Upfront Advantage and Flexible Five, offer members coverage for some preventive services before they meet their deductibles. In Upfront Advantage, members will have access to services worth up to $500 for an individual and $1,000 for a family for free before their deductible is met. In Flexible Five, members will instead be offered five coupons per person for these services; a family of four, for example, would receive 20 coupons that can be applied to services such as primary care visits, behavioral health visits, urgent care, lab tests or x-rays conducted during those visits and generic drugs.

  • Health Payer Intelligence informs us that Humana “has committed to mail out over a million preventive care packages that members can use in their homes. The in-home preventive care packages are designed to support chronic disease prevention for members with diabetes or colon cancer. Members can take the test in their homes to detect diabetes or colon cancer developments as early as possible.” That’s quite an investment.
  • HHS’s Office for Civil Rights announced a HIPAA Privacy Rule breach settlement with a North Carolina based healthcare provider today. It’s noteworthy that the settlement resolved issues that were touched off by a data breach in 2011.

Tuesday Tidbits

My heavens it’s raining hard here in Bethesda Maryland.

Last week the House Appropriations Committee cleared the FY 2021 Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Bill by a vote of 30-22. This is the bill that funds the OPM and the FEHBP. FedWeek calls attention to the fact that the Committee’s report on the bill makes the following FEHBP recommendation:

The Committee recognizes the importance of medical foods, as defined in the Orphan Drug Act (21 U.S.C. 360ee(b)(3)), which often serve as firstline therapies to treat a number of conditions. The Committee is concerned about the lack of coverage of medical foods in FEHBP insurance plans. The Committee encourages OPM to encourage FEHBP plans to explore options for including coverage of medical foods within their plans.

Here’s a link to a Food and Drug Administration set of frequently asked questions about medical foods.

The House Appropriations Committee announced today the Financial Services Appropriations bill is one of seven such bills to be packaged as a minibus (H.R. 7617) and submitted to the House of Representatives for a vote next week.

Last week, the FEHBlog noted a Centers for Disease Control report noting an uptick in drug overdose death last year. Today the American Medical Association released a 2020 progress report from its opioid task force. Fierce Healthcare explains that report finds “a nearly 40% decline in opioid prescriptions in the last five years, but overdose deaths have continued to increase thanks to spiraling use of illicit drugs such as synthetic fentanyl.” Moreover, “[i]n the report, the AMA pressed for changes to remove barriers, such as prior authorization, to addicts gaining access to medical treatments.”

On the Affordable Care Act front —

  • Georgetown Law Professor Katie Keith provides a lengthy and informative update on ACA related litigation if this is your cup of tea. The FEHBlog cannot remember another federal statute that has lead to so much litigation over the validity of government actions thereunder.
  • The Internal Revenue Service released Rev. Proc. 2020-36. To comply with the ACA’s employer mandate, a large employer must offer its employees at least one coverage option that has at least 60% actuarial value and has an employee contribution that does not exceed a certain percentage of salary / wages. Every year the IRS announces the new percentage and the applicable percentage is 9.83% for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2021.

Finally, FedSmith offers guidance to federal employees who are starting to consider civil service retirement. Of note, “you have to be enrolled in FEHB and FEGLI for at least five years before retiring to be eligible to continue these programs after you retire. Having access to FEHB in retirement can save you thousands and thousands of dollars and should not be taken lightly.” How true that is.

Monday Roundup

In federal personnel news —

  • Politico reports that earlier today the Senate confirmed acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought to be permanent OMB Director.
  • Federal News Radio reports that the President intends to nominate John Gibbs to be permanent Director of the Office of Personnel Management. Mr. Gibbs “currently serves as the acting assistant secretary for community planning and development at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

It’s worth noting that the Presidential inauguration will occur six months from today.

On the COVID-19 front —

  • The Wall Street Journal reports that “The prospects of successfully developing a coronavirus vaccine as soon as this year were buoyed Monday when three of the world’s leading candidates reported positive early trial data. Vaccines being developed by University of Oxford researchers and AstraZeneca PLC; PfizerInc. and German partner BioNTech BNTX 3.46% SE; and China’s CanSino Biologics all reported fresh updates showing their shots generated immune responses and were safe to use.
  • Fierce Biotech reports that a double blind human patient study of U.K. manufacturer Synairgen’s inhaled COVID-19 treatment against a placebo produced encouraging results. “The [preliminary] data showed those who were given SNG001 [a nebulizer interferon beta protein] had a 79% lower risk of developing severe disease compared to placebo * * * with patients who got that drug also more than twice as likely to recover from COVID-19 than those on a dummy med.” Synairgen’s press release advises that “‘Further analysis will be conducted over the coming weeks and reported in due course.”

Fingers remain crossed for the vaccines and the new treatment.

Health IT Analytics discusses how “geographic data has helped leaders better understand where to allocate population health resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Given the mantra that all healthcare is local, it only makes sense that geographic data should be helpful for this purpose. For example,

To better understand where to direct resources, researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine recently developed a city-oriented COVID Local Risk Index. The tool calculates COVID-19 risk down to the hyperlocal, neighborhood level by relying on key health, economic, and social data at the census tract level. The index also allows for comparison of COVID-19 risk across other cities and between neighborhoods.

Well done.

Weekend update

The House and the Senate will be in session on Capitol Hill for the next two weeks. The House will begin a district work break at the end of July while the Senate will continue in session until August 5. Congress will be out of session for the remainder of August for the political conventions. It will be interesting to see whether another COVID-19 relief bill emerges over the next three week legislative period.

Speaking of COVID-19, Govexec.com estimates that 19,000 federal employees and 20,000 members of the U.S. military have tested positive for COVID-19. That’s roughly 1% of the total number of federal employees and military members and 1% of the total number of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. That’s encouraging given the fact that many federal employees, e.g., the Postal Service, law enforcement, as well as military members have not been hunkered down during the emergency. Thanks to all of you for your service.

The FEHBlog subscribes to the Washington Post’s Optimist email and today’s lead article caught his attention — “Need some good news about covid-19? Here are six reasons for optimism.” The writer who directs the Health Buildings Program at Harvard’s public health schools discusses six trends that the FEHBlog has been following to one extent of another. It’s helpful to read them summarized here.

The FEHBlog looks forward to virtually attending the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Digital Quality Summit this coming Wednesday and Thursday. The FEHBlog will share a few tidbits with his readership.

In last Friday’s post, the FEHBlog mentioned the key roles that hospitals and other healthcare providers including “pharma” and the prescription benefit managers plus the government play in responding to the COVID-19 emergency. It occurred to the FEHBlog over the weekend that his readers may wonder where health plans fit into this mix.

Health plans need to keep on keeping on, as they have done, by paying claims and helping members navigate the healthcare system, among other things. That’s an important responsibility. In my experience, FEHB plans have not missed a beat during the emergency, and the FEHBlog is proud to serve many of them.

Friday Stats and More

For the third week in a row, new COVID-19 cases have topped 300,000 (nearly 1 million in total) while the number of new deaths remains relatively low and stable (12,000 in sum over the past three weeks) according to the CDC’s cases in the U.S. website which the FEHBlog tracks.

Axios echos the FEHBlog’s sentiment that the medical profession to its credit has learned how to treat COVID-19. That is what you would expect in 2020. Hopefully the government is doing a good job providing healthcare resources to hot spot areas in order to facilitate treatment. In that regard, HHS announced today that “it will begin distributing $10 billion in a second round of high impact COVID-19 area funding to hospitals starting next week.”

In our FEHBP world —

  • Federal News Network reports that OPM has issued new proposed rules to address enrollment problems that arose during the long government shutdown in the winter of 2018-19. Hopefully we won’t encounter another one of those unfortunate events again, but it is better to be safe than sorry. Several of the new flexibilities are already law thanks to a law that Congress passed in 2019.
  • OPM also released today a revised SF 2809 FEHB enrollment form. The form is a handy reference for FEHB enrollment rules. It’s not used as often as it was pre-internet and smart phones.

Finally, the Trump Administration enjoyed two victories in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today. As Healthcare Dive reports

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court decision upholding the Administration’s short term duration health plan rule. The FEHBlog sees no harm in giving consumers greater choice of health care coverage after Congress zeroed out the individual mandate.
  • The Court of Appeals reversed a lower court decision and thereby upheld the Administration’s Medicare “site neutrality” rule that “reduced some payments to off-campus hospital outpatient departments to make them consistent with other outpatient payments.” The court reasoned that

“Reducing the payment rate for a particular OPPS service readily qualifies, in common parlance, as a ‘method for controlling unnecessary increases in the volume’ of that service,” according to the opinion. “The lower the reimbursement rate for a service, the less the incentive to provide it, all else being equal. Reducing the reimbursement rate thus is naturally suited to addressing unnecessary increases in the overall volume of a service provided by hospitals.”

Makes perfect sense to the FEHBlog.

Midweek update

There have been many ups and downs during the COVID-19 emergency. The one effort consistently making sure but steady progress is the COVID-19 vaccine development process. In today’s news from Fierce Healthcare

  • “AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford are set to share “positive news” on their COVID-19 vaccine soon, according to a leading U.K. journalist. The update, which could come as soon as tomorrow, may shed light on how the front-runner vaccine fared in early clinical trials.”
  • “Moderna and its partners in the federal government are just now gearing up for a late-stage COVID-19 vaccine trial set to launch later this month, but at the same time, the mRNA biotech is prepping a supply of doses for quick shipment if the shot gets an FDA go-ahead.”

In this regard, the FEHBlog has noted his addiction to the Econtalk podcast. This week the host Stanford economics professor Russ Roberts dropped this pearl of wisdom in the course of his conversation with a gaming company CEO:

It’s taken me a long time, Josh, but I’ve finally figured out that sometimes something that people are really excited about doesn’t happen. Driverless cars. Four years ago I thought , ‘By 2020 they’re going to be here for sure. AI [Artificial Intelligence], ‘Yeah, soon they won’t even–,’ you fill in the blank. A lot of these things turn out to be harder than they were thought to be. And of course, part of the reason for that is that the people who’ve spent the money to take the chances on it have an incentive to overstate the hype. It’s just part of the natural human experience.

And of course there are also the lawyers telling the entrepreneurs to tone it down. Hopefully the COVID-19 vaccine for which we are all excited will be a near term success. Knock on wood.

In telemedicine news —

  • The Health Affairs Blog features a detailed CMS Administrator Seema Verma article on the topic. She concludes “During these unprecedented times, telemedicine has proven to be a lifeline for health care providers and patients. The rapid adoption of telemedicine among providers and patients has shown that telehealth is here to stay. CMS remains committed to ensuring that the government supports innovation in telehealth that leverages modern technology to enhance patient experience, providing more accessible care.”
  • Health Payer Intelligence reports that

As payers lean more heavily on remote care, consumers stressed the need for greater convenience in care delivery and prefer to turn to telehealth and digital solutions, in part, as the answer, according to a recent CVS Health study. CVS Health fielded the survey in March 2020 and garnered 1,000 respondents. It drew particularly from twelve major cities and targeted African American and Hispanic participants. An additional survey covered 400 providers.

What a happy coincidence!

Finally, Healthcare Dive informs us about UnitedHealth Groups’s second quarter 2020 earnings report.

Payer arm UnitedHealthcare, the largest commercial health insurer in the U.S., brought in $49.1 million in revenue, up just 1% year over year. But its medical loss ratio, a marker of how much an insurer spends on patient care, plummeted to 70.2% in the quarter ended June 30, compared to 83.1% same time last year, due to temporary deferral of care amid the pandemic.

The question of course is when will the bounce back occur?

Midweek Update

A House of Representatives appropriations subcommittee approved by voice vote today the bill funding financial services and general government for the 2021 fiscal year. That bill encompasses OPM and the FEHBP. Yesterday’s FEHBlog post discussed the relevant substance of the bill considered today. The bill now moves onto full appropriations committee consideration.

Fierce Healthcare reports that “Healthcare leaders and health IT groups are calling on Congress to repeal a section of the law that prevents the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from working with the private sector to develop a nationwide patient identification strategy.” The advocates are pointing to the COVID-19 emergency as another reason for taking this sensible action. ” Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing efforts are hampered without accurate demographic information that correctly identifies the right patient.”

Also, on the COVID-19 front, the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) announced today that “The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the NIH, has established a new clinical trials network that aims to enroll thousands of volunteers in large-scale clinical trials testing a variety of investigational vaccines and monoclonal antibodies intended to protect people from COVID-19.”

The Wall Street Journal reports that

Drugmaker Emergent Biosolutions Inc. plans to work with Mount Sinai Health System in New York City to test whether a drug derived from the blood plasma of recovered Covid-19 patients can prevent infections in doctors, nurses and military forces. The proposed study, which the partners announced Wednesday, would add to efforts evaluating the coronavirus-fighting potential of experimental drugs made from plasma donated by recovered patients. If the drug proves to work safely, it could help protect health-care workers and other people working in essential jobs who are at high risk of infection until a vaccine is ready and perhaps even after.

On the general U.S. healthcare front Healthcare Dive reports that

Walgreens on Wednesday announced plans to open up to 700 primary care clinics across the country over the next five years in partnership with medical services provider VillageMD, and “hundreds more” after that. As part of the agreement, Walgreens will invest $1 billion in equity and convertible debt in Chicago-based VillageMD over the next three years, including a $250 million equity investment Wednesday. VillageMD will use 80% of the funds to pay for opening the clinics, called Village Medical at Walgreens, and integrate digitally with Walgreens.

and that

Walmart will now sell health insurance policies directly to its customers, a spokesperson told Healthcare Dive, confirming speculation sparked by job postings from the retailer for Medicare sales managers and insurance agents, first reported by the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. Analysts with SVB Leerlink said the move underscores the attractiveness of this market and the likelihood of increased competition over time, while Walmart’s reach across U.S. consumers — including seniors — has the potential to drive up volume for Medicare plans.

What’s more, Health Payer Intelligence discusses why some health plans seek out seriously ill members to wit “By developing a greater understanding of seriously ill populations, payers and policymakers can more accurately target their population health management strategies.”

And a Forbes columnist criticizes government telehealth parity mandates. The column provides an interesting perspective on the telehealth craze. As the FEHBlog’s late grandmother frequently advised “moderation in all things.”

Last but not least, FedWeek explores the OPM Federal Employees Benefits Survey to understand why some federal employees don’t enroll in our beloved FEHBP.

the survey found that of those not enrolled [roughly 19% of the surveyed population], 90 percent are obtaining health care through some other program, most commonly through a spouse’s employment and most commonly through the military TRICARE program. “Less than one percent of respondents said that they are not enrolled in FEHB and do not have health insurance because they do not think there is a need,” OPM said.

A Suggestion

While enjoying the Fourth of July weekend with perhaps a favorite beverage, listen to or read the transcript of the Econtalk podcast in which the host Russ Roberts interviews Vivian Lee, MD, about her book on healthcare reform called The Long Fix. Ms. Lee was CEO of the University of Utah health system and she currently is an executive with Alphabet’s Verily Life Sciences. Very informative. Happy Fourth of July to all.

Monday Roundup

Modern Healthcare reports tonight that

HHS spokesperson Michael Caputo on Monday tweeted that HHS intends to extend the COVID-19 public health emergency that is set to expire on July 25. The extension would prolong the emergency designation by 90 days. Several payment policies and regulatory adjustments are attached to the public health emergency, so the extension is welcome news for healthcare providers.

The Centers for Disease Control released updated guidance on the use of cloth face coverings during the COVID-19 emergency.

Cloth face coverings are recommended as a simple barrier to help prevent respiratory droplets from traveling into the air and onto other people when the person wearing the cloth face covering coughs, sneezes, talks, or raises their voice. This is called source control. This recommendation is based on what we know about the role respiratory droplets play in the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19, paired with emerging evidence from clinical and laboratory studies that shows cloth face coverings reduce the spray of droplets when worn over the nose and mouth. COVID-19 spreads mainly among people who are in close contact with one another (within about 6 feet), so the use of cloth face coverings is particularly important in settings where people are close to each other or where social distancing is difficult to maintain.

Healthcare Dive alerts us that

Gilead will charge between $2,340 and $3,120 for a typical course of treatment with its COVID-19 drug remdesivir, which has been shown to speed the recovery of patients hospitalized with the infectious disease.

The drug’s price will depend on whether patients are covered by government insurance or commercial health plans. Gilead will offer remdesivir to governments in developed countries at a price of $390 per vial. In the U.S., private insurers will pay $520 per vial. 

Most patients will be treated for five days, using six vials, Gilead said in announcing its much anticipated pricing decision Monday. If treatment stretches to 10 days — initially the standard treatment course — remdesivir’s cost would rise to $5,720 for patients who are commercially insured. 

The announced prices are in line with expert predictions.

MedCity News discusses Walmart’s new health clinics.

The company rolled out two Walmart Health clinics this month, in Loganville, Georgia and Springdale, Arkansas.

These aren’t your usual walk-in clinics that might serve as a quick place to get vaccinated or get a cold checked out. Rather, they’re more like a one-stop shop for healthcare, with primary care, urgent care, diagnostics, x-rays, behavioral health and dental care.

Walmart Health’s other big differentiator: A primary care appointment costs just $40. For children? $20.