Tuesday’s Tidbits

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

From Capitol Hill, Federal News Network discusses two bipartisan bills affecting federal hiring practices and federal retirement annuities that are under active consideration.

From the Postal Service Health Benefits Program front, it appears to the FEHBlog that OPM has been adding to its PSHBP FAQs without giving the public an online heads-up when an addition occurs, e.g., last updated xx/xx/xxxx.

From the public health front

  • The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force released for public comment a draft inconclusive (“I”) recommendation “that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for lipid disorders in children and adolescents age 20 years or younger.” This proposed action would confirm the ongoing vitality of a 2016 recommendation. The public comment deadline is February 21.
  • The National Institutes of Health discusses its approach to “shouldering the burden of rare diseases.” NIH notes “While individually each disease is rare, collectively rare diseases are common: More than 10,000 rare diseases affect nearly 400 million people worldwide. In the United States, the prevalence of rare diseases (over 30 million people) rivals or exceeds that of common diseases such as diabetes (37.3 million people), Alzheimer’s disease (6.5 million people), and heart failure (6.2 million people).”
  • STAT News discusses legal developments in the FDA’s practices of approving “orphan drugs” to treat rare diseases. “In an unexpected move, the Food and Drug Administration will continue to apply exclusive marketing rights for so-called orphan drugs under its existing regulations, rather than take a broader approach suggested by a federal court in a highly controversial case involving one such medicine.”
  • Fierce Healthcare reports “The White House, federal agencies and lawmakers today marked the elimination of the DATA-Waiver Program, better known as the X-Waiver requirement, with calls for providers to begin incorporating opioid use disorder treatment buprenorphine in everyday patient care. The X-Waiver requirement only permitted doctors who had received specialized training and federal permissions to prescribe the opioid partial agonist, which is a controlled substance.”

From the Rx coverage front —

  • Segal Consulting offers plan sponsors its analysis of weight loss drugs to treat diabetes and obesity.
  • Fierce Healthcare tells us about Amazon’s new RxPass program and adds that Optum Rx “launched a new tool that aims to make it easier to compare the direct-to-consumer price for generic drugs to the price with insurance.” RxPass is not available to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries and “is not currently available to send medications to California, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington.”

Monday Roundup

Photo by Sven Read on Unsplash

From the Omicron and siblings front, the Wall Street Journal reports

Most people would get one Covid-19 shot annually—as they do with the flu shot—under Food and Drug Administration proposals for simplifying the nation’s Covid-19 vaccine procedures.

The drug regulator also proposed that people getting vaccinated for the first time receive vaccines that target both Omicron and the original strain of the coronavirus. 

The proposals, outlined in materials the FDA released Monday, would mark the biggest changes to Covid-19 vaccinations since boosters rolled out and are a sign of the nation’s shift to a more endemic-like approach to the coronavirus.

Vaccine experts who advise the FDA are scheduled to meet Thursday to discuss the proposals. The advisers are scheduled to vote on whether to give the bivalent shot as the initial inoculation, as is already allowed in Europe.

Makes sense to the FEHBlog.

From the OPM front, the House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has sent OPM Director Kiran Ahuja a letter demanding documents and a staff briefing on the recent GAO report criticizing OPM’s internal controls over family member eligibility in the FEHBP. Here’s a little free advice for my favorite agency. Rather than coming up with your own solutions, adopt solutions that have been proven to work in the private sector — the HIPAA 820 standard enrollment transaction which ties premium payments to enrollees and dependent eligibility verification audits based on statistical sampling.

From the U.S. healthcare business front —

Fierce Healthcare informs us

Elevance Health has inked a deal to acquire Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana, with the Pelican State insurer joining the Anthem Blue Cross affiliated plans.

The acquisition builds on an existing partnership between the two insurers, according to the announcement. The two jointly own Healthy Blue, a plan that serves Medicaid and dual-eligible beneficiaries. 

The combination will also allow BCBSLA to accelerate its push toward improved access, affordability and quality for its 1.9 million members, thanks to the capabilities of Elevance Health’s Carelon subsidiary, the companies said. More than $4 billion has been invested in Carelon over the past several years, building out its behavioral health, complex and chronic care programs and digital health models.

and

CVS Health has named two key leaders for its pharmacy and consumer products business, including a returning face to the company, according to a report from Bloomberg.

David Joyner, a former executive at the company, will make a return as the leader of its pharmacy services segment, which includes the Caremark pharmacy benefit manager, people familiar with the matter told the outlet. Joyner left CVS three years ago and will succeed Alan Lotvin, M.D., who is set to retire.

In addition, former Express Scripts President Amy Bricker will join the company as the chief product officer for the consumer segment, which centers on developing new products for CVS’ consumer health brands, Bloomberg reported.

Fierce Healthcare points out a twist in the second story.

That Bricker had departed Express Scripts, a subsidiary of Cigna, was revealed last week when the PBM announced it had named a new president, veteran supply chain leader Adam Kautzner. What was next for Bricker, however, was conspicuously absent from the announcement.

The FEHBlog often counsels clients on Family and Medical Leave Act issues. He had no idea until today that the Labor Department offers helpful information to healthcare provider and employees on this law. For example,

This background information can fill knowledge gaps for employers too.

From the Rx coverage front —

  • The Washington Post reports on the reaction to “the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, based on decades of scientific research, call[ing] for early and aggressive treatment, instead of “watchful waiting.” They urge intensive therapy for children as young as 6, weight loss drugs for those as young as 12 and surgery for teens as young as 13.”
  • The Institute for Clinical and Economic Research released a

Final Evidence Report on Fezolinetant for Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause

— Independent appraisal committee voted that evidence is not yet adequate to demonstrate a net health benefit for fezolinetant when compared to no pharmacological treatment —

—  Using point estimates from short-term clinical trials, analyses suggest this drug would achieve common thresholds for cost-effectiveness if priced between $2,000 – $2,600 per year for women who cannot or choose not to take menopausal hormone therapy —

— All stakeholders have a responsibility and an important role to play in ensuring that women have access to effective new treatment options for symptoms of menopause

The ICER upshot is “Given that many patients may benefit from readily available, effective, and low cost [menopausal hormone therapy] MHT, clinical experts agreed that it would be reasonable for payers to require prescriber attestation that patients are not appropriate candidates for MHT prior to prescribing fezolinetant.”

From the SDOH front, Health Leaders Media tells us about new ICD-10 diagnosis codes with an SDOH emphasis which will take effect on April 1, 2023.

From the telehealth front, U.S. News reports,

Despite distance and occasional technical glitches, a new study finds that most patients like seeing a surgeon for the first time via video.

The study was published Jan. 19 in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons. * * *

The study included 387 patients who participated in first-time visits between May 2021 and June 2022 at general surgery clinics across the Vanderbilt system. Researchers used a standard questionnaire to look at the quality of shared decision-making and asked patients and surgeons open-ended questions about their consultations.

In all, 77.8% of patients had an in-person visit, while 22.2% saw their doctor remotely.

Both groups reported high levels of quality communication during these appointments.

Levels of shared decision-making and quality of communication were similar between remote visits and in-person care, the study found.

In responding to the open-ended questions, patients praised the convenience and usefulness of telehealth appointments. Researchers received some negative comments about technical difficulties and not being physically present.

Thursday Miscellany

Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

From our Nation’s capital, the Wall Street Journal reports

The Treasury Department began taking special measures to keep paying the government’s bills on Thursday as the U.S. bumped up against its borrowing limit, kicking off a potentially lengthy and difficult debate in Congress over raising the debt ceiling

With the federal government constrained by the roughly $31.4 trillion debt limit, the Treasury Department began deploying so-called extraordinary measures. Those accounting maneuvers, which include suspending investments for certain government accounts, will allow the Treasury to keep paying obligations to bondholders, Social Security recipients and others until at least early June, the department said last week.  

That gives lawmakers on Capitol Hill and the Biden administration roughly five months to pass legislation raising or suspending the debt limit. In a letter to congressional leaders on Thursday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said there was “considerable uncertainty” about how long extraordinary measures can last. 

“I respectfully urge Congress to act promptly to protect the full faith and credit of the United States,” Ms. Yellen said. 

From the OPM front, OPM issued “Guidance on Increasing Opportunities for Federal Internships, Fellowships, and Other Early Career Programs” and, according to MeriTalk, held a “virtual job fair organized today by Tech to Gov in partnership with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is targeting a wide range of Federal government technology and related positions as part of the government’s goal to restock its tech ranks amid a slowdown in hiring by the private sector.” As daily reports of layoffs at tech companies have been appearing in the news, OPM’s timing for the job fair is opportune.

Today, benefits expert Tammy Flanagan completed her three Govexec columns on federal employee and annuitant benefit changes for this year.

From the Omicron and siblings front,

MedPage Today tells us, “Real-World Data Support Bivalent COVID-19 Boosters in Older Adults — Study from Israel showa ed high level of protection in people 65 and up.” MedPage Today’s medical editor in chief Dr. Jeremy Faust comments

[T]he Israeli data really helps us understand that for 65-years-olds and over, getting a bivalent booster is going to protect against hospitalization. We don’t know how long that’s going to last, and that’s the key. If it turns out that the bivalent booster ends up having a much longer tail of effectiveness than the monovalent did, that’ll be good news, but it’ll depend upon what variants are circulating and other factors, but we are watching that.

Reuters adds

The European Union’s drug regulator has not identified any safety signals in the region related to U.S. drugmaker Pfizer Inc (PFE.N) and German partner BioNTech’s updated COVID-19 shot, the agency said on Wednesday.

On Friday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention said that a safety monitoring system had flagged that the shot could possibly be linked to a type of brain stroke in older adults, according to preliminary data.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will consider this safety issue at a meeting on January 26.

Also from the FDA front, the Wall Street Journal informs us

U.S. drug regulators rejected Eli Lilly & Co.’s proposed new Alzheimer’s disease treatment, saying they need more data from clinical testing, according to the company.

The setback could delay a potential commercial introduction of the highly anticipated drug by at least several months, if the Food and Drug Administration eventually decides to approve it. * * *

The agency had recently approved another Alzheimer’s therapy. Earlier this month, the FDA gave early approval to a new Alzheimer’s drug from Eisai Co. and Biogen Inc.

Lilly had been hoping for an accelerated FDA approval of donanemab early this year. Now, a midyear filing of a standard drug application means an FDA decision could be pushed back into 2024, based on typical FDA timelines of taking six to 10 months to review new drug applications.

The American Hospital Association relates

In an online survey last November of 1,200 U.S. adults previously vaccinated against COVID-19, 62% had not yet received a bivalent booster dose, most often because they did not know they were eligible or the booster was available, or believed they were immune against infection, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported today. After viewing information about eligibility and availability, over two-thirds of them planned to get a bivalent booster and 29% reported receiving the booster in a follow-up survey in December. To help increase bivalent booster coverage, the report recommends using evidence-based strategies to inform patients about booster recommendations and waning immunity.

From the No Surprises Act front, Healthcare Dive points out

  • Many Americans are still exposed to the potential for a surprise medical bill from an out-of-network ambulance ride, a research report published in Health Affairs found. About 28% of emergency trips in a ground ambulance resulted in a potential surprise bill, according to the research that analyzed commercial insurance claims.
  • About 85% of emergency transports were deemed out of network between 2014 and 2017, researchers found. But two-thirds of those trips are paid in full by insurers, eliminating the risk of a surprise bill.
  • The report shows the difference in pricing by ground ambulance ownership and how that affects patients’ financial exposure. * * *
  • Given the high prevalence for a potential surprise bill, protections like those afforded to consumers in the No Surprises Act may be necessary for both emergency and non-emergency transports, the authors said.

The FEHBlog is puzzled by the author’s extension of NSA protection to non-emergency transports, which the consumer should have time to manage. Congress should not overload the NSA system.

From the telehealth front, Healthcare Dive reports

  • Private insurers paid roughly the same for telehealth and in-person visits during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic as virtual care surged, according to new research from the Kaiser Family Foundation.
  • Though it’s unclear how payment rates might have changed over the past two years, the findings call into question the argument that telehealth is saving the healthcare system money, researchers said.
  • However, researchers said that perks of telehealth included expanded access and convenience — cost benefits of which were not factored into the study.

Fierce Healthcare tells us

UnitedHealthcare is rolling out a new virtual behavioral health coaching program backed by Optum.

The offering is available as of Jan. 1 for 5 million fully insured members, and self-insured employers can purchase the program as an employer benefit. Through the program, adults with symptoms of mild depression, stress and anxiety can access support for their mental health needs through virtual modules as well as one-on-one video conferences, phone calls or messaging with coaches. * * *

Members who use virtual coaching can connect with a dedicated behavioral health coach for a 30-minute weekly audio or video call and can chat with their coach using in-app messaging between sessions.

The program lasts eight weeks, and each member will complete an assessment at the onset to identify their individual needs. Coaches use cognitive behavioral therapy techniques to assist the patient in crafting an action plan that is personalized to them.

In other UHC news, Beckers Payer Issues relates

The largest employer of physicians in the United States is not HCA, the VA, or Kaiser Permanente — it’s UnitedHealth Group’s Optum.

With at least 60,000 employed or aligned physicians across 2,000 locations in 2023, Optum has cemented itself at the forefront of the quickly changing healthcare delivery landscape. For comparison, Bloomberg reported in 2021 that Ascension employs or is affiliated with 49,000 physicians, HCA has 47,000 and Kaiser has 24,000.

Given that the Affordable Care Act limits health insurers, but not healthcare providers, profits, UHC made a smart move, in the FEHBlog’s opinion.

From the Rx coverage front, STAT News tells us

In a bid to blunt competition and address rising drug costs, Sanofi is offering a warranty that will cover the cost for any hospital if a specific medicine fails to work, marking only the second time a major pharmaceutical company has taken such a step.

In this instance, Sanofi designed a warranty program for its Cablivi medication, which is used to treat aTTP, a rare, life-threatening autoimmune blood disorder that is considered a medical emergency. The cost will be refunded for up to six doses for patients who fail to initially respond or up to 12 doses for patients whose condition worsens.

The move comes after Pfizer began offering warranties for two of its medicines, the first of which debuted in August 2021. At the time, the Pfizer effort was the first of its kind in the pharmaceutical industry. Unlike the Sanofi warranty, however, the Pfizer programs offer refunds to patients — not hospitals — if the medicines fail to work sufficiently.

Although the approaches vary, both companies are signaling their interest in differentiating themselves from competitors, not just responding to complaints about the rising cost of medicines, according to Emad Samad, president of Octaviant Financial, a firm that is promoting the use of warranties in the pharmaceutical industry.

How would these warranties redound to the benefit of third party payers?

From the miscellany front

  • Cigna offers a paper about “Digging into the Unique Drivers and Healthy Behaviors That Impact Vitality.”
  • The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force released a chart of its most impactful 2022 recommendations.
  • Fierce Healthcare reports, “The number of providers serving as [Medicare] accountable care organizations increased slightly this year thanks to the start of a new advanced model and a slew of reforms meant to reverse a slide in participation.”
  • Mercer Consulting digs into “must do” valued based care strategies.
  • The MIT Technology Review considers the prospect of gene editing for the masses using CRISPR 3.0
  • STAT News discusses the “hot mess” of legal issues associated with the FDA’s recent decision to make abortion drugs available at pharmacies.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

From the Omicron and siblings front

  • The New York Times accurately describes this Covid winter as a bump rather than a surge.
  • The Washington Post discusses a large medical study that supports the need for pregnant women to be vaccinated against Covid.

On a related note the Wall Street Journal reports

An experimental vaccine from Moderna Inc. significantly reduced the risk of a viral respiratory disease among older adults in a large clinical trial, the latest promising sign in drugmakers’ efforts to fight the deadly RSV virus. * * *

The results are the latest for an experimental RSV vaccine. Also developing shots are GSK PLC, Pfizer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson

Meanwhile, Sanofi SA and AstraZeneca PLC have co-developed an antibody-based drug to be used for the prevention of RSV in infants. They applied for FDA approval of the drug and expect a decision in the third quarter of 2023.

From the FEHB front, Reg Jones, a retired OPM FEHB contracting officer, provides an “insiders look at FEHB” in FedWeek. His first observation is

First, when the FEHB became law some 60 years ago, I think it would have been better if there had only been a single risk pool. In other words, no Self Only, Self Plus One, and Self and Family options. Because there are these distinctions, enrollees have ever since wanted to further carve up the risk pool, creating subcategories, such as employees vs. retirees or retirees with or without Medicare as their primary insurer.

While the FEHBlog fully agrees with Mr. Jones about the value of risk pooling to FEHB, the self only, self plus one, and self and family choices are enrollment choices that affect the premiums paid but not the risk pool. OPM does break out risk pools by plan option, e.g., Standard, Basic, Elevate.

Mr. Jones is concerned about the risk pool splitting occasioned by the creation of the new Postal Service Health Benefits Program. The FEHBlog has stated his belief that OPM could have avoided this outcome by allowing FEHB plans to offer Medicare Part D EGWPs back in 2005. The FEHBlog expects that once FEHB enrollees see the lower premiums in PSHBP, Medicare D EGWPs will be added to FEHB and before the PSHBP and FEHB will become one again.

Mr. Jones also presses concern about access to medically necessary benefits which coincidentally is a topic that STAT News addressed today stemming from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Research’s publication of its “Second Annual Assessment of Barriers to Fair Access Within US Commercial Insurance Prescription Drug Coverage.” Here is a summary of the ICER Assessment’s results:

The assessment found a high level of alignment between coverage policies and fair access criteria across the formularies with the highest number of covered lives of large private payers and the VHA in the United States.  Across all relevant payer policies, ICER gave concordance ratings of 70% (59/84) for cost-sharing policies of drugs that ICER found to be reasonably priced, 96% (310/322) for clinical eligibility criteria, 98% (316/322) for step therapy criteria and 100% (322/322) for prescriber restrictions.

In the exploratory transparency analysis for select migraine and ulcerative colitis (UC) drugs aimed at discerning whether prospective plan members can find information about cost-sharing and clinical eligibility, payers were found to provide relatively good transparency into their formularies (16/18 payers met transparency criteria) but only 10/18 payers provided adequate transparency into their clinical coverage policies. In an exploratory analysis for documentation burden which reviewed the number of questions on prior authorization forms, prior authorization policies for UC and migraine drugs had a median number of questions from 25 to 36 and a range of questions from 22 to 71.

One of the most notable results of this effort is the change in coverage policies made by five payers for 11 drugs following receipt of draft results of the assessment. These changes all served to bring coverage into alignment with fair access criteria.

Note bene

ICER will host a public webinar at 12:00 p.m. ET on January 18, 2023 to discuss the key conclusions and policy implications of this assessment. Webinar presenters will include:

  • Sarah Emond, MPP, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, ICER
  • Mary B. Dwight, Senior Vice President and Chief Policy & Advocacy Officer, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation 
  • Meghan Buzby, Executive Director, Coalition for Headache and Migraine Patients (CHAMP) 

Register here for the webinar.

Also from the Rx coverage front

Fierce Healthcare reports “California has filed suit against a slew of major drugmakers and pharmacy benefit managers, alleging that they acted unlawfully to drive up the cost of insulin.”

Pharmacy Times informs us

The FDA has approved a label update for semaglutide (Rybelsus; Novo Nordisk) that allows the drug to be used in addition to diet and exercise as a first-line option to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes.

This update removes a previous limitation that stated the medication should not be used as initial therapy for treating patients with type 2 diabetes. With its initial FDA approval in 2019, semaglutide became the first and only glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog in pill form.

“The removal of the limitation of use is an important step forward for people living with type 2 diabetes and provides the option for Rybelsus to be taken earlier,” said Aaron King, MD, a family medicine and diabetes specialist, in a press release. “By taking Rybelsus first, people with type 2 diabetes, in conjunction with their care teams, are now able to utilize this medicine early in their diabetes treatment journeys.”

On a related note, the Wall Street Journal tells us

Parents and doctors are looking for new strategies to help adolescents with obesity. One controversial approach drawing the interest of some families is intermittent fasting, which limits people to eating for just a part of the day or week

Intermittent fasting has gained traction among adults who use it to try to manage weight and improve health. Doctors have largely avoided trying it with adolescents out of concern that introducing a fasting period to their schedules might result in nutritional gaps or trigger eating disorders when teens are rapidly growing and developing.

Now, a small number of doctors and researchers are evaluating types of intermittent fasting in adolescents, searching for solutions as rates of obesity and Type 2 diabetes rise. One pediatric endocrinologist in Los Angeles is launching a clinical trial looking at eating within a set time window in adolescents with obesity. Researchers in Australia are completing a separate trial, the results of which they expect to publish later this year.

Healthcare Dive and Fierce Healthcare offer tidbits from the medical technology front. Healthcare IT News considers whether telehealth can be used for preventive care.

From the U.S. healthcare front,

  • Beckers Hospital Review lists Healthgrades’ Top 50 Hospitals.
  • Insurance News Net fills us in on AHIP’s foci for 2023. “Access and affordability are the top two concerns of the health insurance industry as we move into a new year.”
  • You can scan Fierce Healthcare’s Fierce 15 of 2023 honorees here.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

From the FEHB front, Federal News Network provides an update on the GAO report on FEHB that was mentioned in yesterday’s post.

The Office of Personnel Management, the agency that runs the health insurance program for federal employees and retirees, does not have a clear way to identify and remove FEHB enrollees’ family members who are erroneously part of the program, according to the Government Accountability Office.

“The longer OPM delays its efforts to establish a monitoring mechanism to identify and remove ineligible members from FEHB, the more ineligible members and related improper payments in the program may continue to accrue, costing the program millions, or up to approximately one billion dollars per year, according to OPM’s own estimate,” GAO said in a Jan. 9 report.

OPM said it has received the final report and is planning to flesh out a larger response soon.

OPM’s Healthcare and Insurance Office “will be evaluating potential action items, including timelines, and will provide a comprehensive response to GAO within 180 days upon evaluation of the recommendations,” OPM spokesperson Viet Tran told Federal News Network.

From the public health front,

January is Cervical Cancer Awareness Month, and Patient Engagement HIT tells us

Nearly one in 10 women have never had a common cervical cancer screening, like a Pap test, with issues such as limited health literacy and poor access to care getting in the way, according to a Harris Poll conducted on behalf of BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company).

These trends are more common in racial minorities, with Black and Hispanic women being more likely to say they have never had a Pap test. Compared to the 6% of White women who said they’ve never had a Pap test, 12% of Hispanic women and 13% of Black women said the same. * * *

receipt of Pap tests is extremely low, the survey of 872 women ages 18 to 64. Overall, 71 percent of respondents have delayed getting a Pap test, with 15 percent saying their last OB/GYN check-up was three years ago.

Although not explicitly explored in the survey, it’s key to note that timeline aligns with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic when access to primary and preventive care stalled. * * *

The good news is, around three-quarters of all respondents, regardless of race, said they have resolved to get back on track with their primary and preventive care, including Pap tests and HPV screenings, in the new year.

But doing so will require some leg work from the healthcare industry, which should note some patient health literacy and convenient care access snags getting in the way.

Even though nearly every respondent said they are knowledgeable about women’s health (91 percent), a whopping 81 percent admitted they don’t know how often they should get a Pap test and 51 percent said they were unaware of how often they should get an HPV test.

The survey also found consumer support for an at-home screening test. Kaiser Permanente and MD Anderson Center offer their views on at-home screening, and MD Anderson reminds us

The best protection for both men and women against HPV and related cancers[, i.e. cervical cancer,] is the HPV vaccine. All males and females ages 9-26 should get the HPV vaccine. It is most effective when given at ages 11-12. Unvaccinated men and women ages 27-45 should also talk to their doctor about the benefits of the vaccine.

MedPage Today reports

Adhering to healthy eating patterns was associated with lower risk of total and cause-specific mortality, a prospective cohort study with up to 36 years of follow-up showed.

Among 75,230 women from the Nurses’ Health Study and 44,085 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, those who scored in the highest quintile for healthy eating patterns recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) had a 14% to 20% lower risk of total mortality versus those in the lowest quintile, reported Frank Hu, MD, PhD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, and colleagues in JAMA Internal Medicine opens in a new tab or window.

The pooled multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of total mortality with four healthy eating patterns were (P<0.001 for trend for all):

  • Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015): HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.84)
  • Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED): HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.84)
  • Healthful Plant-Based Diet Index (HPDI): HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89)
  • Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI): HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.77-0.82)

This lower risk was consistent across all racial and ethnic groups.

NIH’s NIAAA Director provides tips for a successful dry January. Good luck to all those who made this resolution because

Taking a break from alcohol for an entire month provides one with an opportunity to assess their patterns of alcohol consumption and how it affects them physically and mentally. It gives a person a chance to cultivate alternatives for relaxing, socializing, and coping with stress. As a result, many people experience benefits such as improved sleep and waking without the fatigue, malaise, and upset stomach of a hangover. Some also find that without the extra calories due to alcohol they lose weight. Participants in Dry January also describe positive effects on their relationships. And an added bonus is saving money.

STAT News brings us up to date on mpox.

From the Omicron and siblings front,

  • Becker’s Hospital Review provides some geographic details on the current winter’s Covid surge.
  • The National Institutes of Health announced “The antiviral treatment Paxlovid reduced the risk of hospitalization or death from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants in older adults by 44%. Wider use of Paxlovid may help temper a winter surge of COVID-19, as some other treatments are no longer effective.”
  • Politico reports on progress being made to end the Covid public health emergency later this year.

From the Food and Drug Administration front,

  • STAT News interviews the FDA Administrator Robert Califf on the Congressional investigative report concerning the Aduhelm fiasco.
  • The FDA announced that “In 2022,  the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research approved 37 new drugs never before approved or marketed in the U.S., known as “novel” drugs, as noted in our annual New Drug Therapy Approvals report. We also approved drugs in new settings, such as for new uses and patient populations.” 

From the Rx coverage front, Drug Channels delves into major prescription benefit manager formulary exclusions lists for 2023.

From the medical research front, the National Institutes of Health announced, “Researchers developed a blood test that could detect Alzheimer’s disease-promoting compounds in the blood long before symptoms emerged. The findings may lead to early diagnostic tests for Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front

  • Fierce Healthcare’s lead article on the ongoing JP Morgan healthcare conference concerns CVS’s Heath’s foray into primary care.
  • Healthcare Dive adds, “CVS Health is exploring an acquisition of value-based primary care chain Oak Street Health, according to a Monday Bloomberg report. The two are in ongoing talks and could reach a deal within weeks that values Oak Street at more than $10 billion including debt, according to Bloomberg, which cited sources familiar with the matter a deal.”
  • Healthcare Dive informs us that “Teladoc Health shared an early look at its financial results at JPMorgan’s healthcare conference on Monday, indicating between $633 million and $640 million in revenue for the fourth quarter, a little higher than consensus estimates from analysts. The virtual care giant projected total 2022 revenue between $2.4 billion and $2.41 billion, according to its regulatory filing. Teladoc’s direct-to-consumer mental health unit, BetterHelp, is expected to contribute roughly $1 billion of that topline.”
  • STAT News reports, “Rising labor costs have been the main financial concern for hospitals over the past year, but those costs have peaked and are now a lot lower, according to hospital system executives who presented during the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference.”

From the post-Dobbs front, STAT News tells us about telehealth provider reactions to the Justice Department’s announcement last week permitting abortion drugs to be sold by mail and the FDA’s opportunity for pharmacies to sell those drugs.

From the Supreme Court front, STAT News relates

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a bid by Pfizer to use a copay-assistance program to help Medicare beneficiaries pay for an expensive heart drug. The company argued the program would not violate kickback laws, a controversial issue that forced numerous drugmakers to pay large fines. Last July, an appeals court panel upheld a lower court ruling that such programs would violate federal law, but Pfizer filed a petition to the Supreme Court that contended such interpretations are “staggeringly overbroad.” Pfizer maintained there was no “corrupt intent” in offering assistance and that Medicare beneficiaries would be denied needed medicines they would otherwise not be able to afford.

It’s up to Congress to fix this problem.

Friday Stats and More

Photo by Sincerely Media on Unsplash

From the Centers for Disease Control’s weekly interpretative summary of its Covid statistics:

New Cases — “As of January 4, 2023, the current 7-day average of weekly new cases (67,243) increased 16.2% compared with the previous 7-day average (57,847). A total of 101,094,670 COVID-19 cases have been reported in the United States as of January 4, 2023. * * *

The most prevalent Omicron lineages this week are BQ.1.1, projected to be 34.4% (95% PI 26.7-
43%); XBB.1.5, projected to be 27.6% (95% PI 14.0-46.5); and BQ.1, projected to be 21.4% (95% PI 16.1-27.7%). XBB, BA.5, BN.1, BF.7, and BA.2.75 are all projected to be between 1% and 5% of circulating viruses.”

New Hospitalizations — “The current 7-day daily average for December 28, 2022–January 3, 2023, was 6,519. This is a 16.1% increase from the prior 7-day average (5,613) from December 21–27, 2022.”

New Deaths — “The current 7-day average of new deaths (390) increased 8.3% compared with the previous 7-day average (360). As of January 4, 2023, a total of 1,091,184 COVID-19 deaths have been reported in the United States.”

Vaccinations — “As of January 4, 2023, 665.1 million vaccine doses have been administered in the United States. Overall, about 229.3 million people, or 69.1% of the total U.S. population, have completed a primary series. More than 48.2 million people, or 15.4% of the U.S. population ages five years and older, have received an updated (bivalent) booster dose.”

Politico observes

Though Covid hospitalizations appear to be on the rise nationwide, experts don’t project this Omicron subvariant alone to cause a spike — forecasts from early data suggest they’ll remain fairly steady, Céline Gounder, an infectious disease specialist and senior fellow at the Kaiser Family Foundation, said. * * *

The prediction matches the data from Singapore, where a related subvariant recently became dominant but didn’t result in a spike in hospitalizations and deaths — though that country’s vaccination rate is higher than that of the U.S.

But some individuals — particularly people who are older or pregnant or have weakened immune systems — are at heightened risk from the virus, regardless of larger population trends.

“I’m a bit concerned with it just because it’s coupled with the extremely low booster rates of those over 65,” Katelyn Jetelina, epidemiologist and professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center, said. “Our most vulnerable aren’t as protected.”

The FEHBlog was encouraged to read this American Hospital Association post about a National Institutes for Health / HHS trial:

The Department of Health and Human Services will launch this month a COVID-19 Home Test to Treat telehealth pilot program in Berks County, Pa. Program organizers will work this year with public health departments to expand the program to 100,000 people in vulnerable communities. Telehealth services provider eMed will implement the program, and UMass Chan Medical School will analyze the impact on participating communities.

“At-home testing for COVID-19 is now widely available in the United States, as are antiviral treatments, and this program combines easy home access to both,” said Bruce Tromberg, director of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, which will launch the program with HHS’ Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response.

NPR adds

“What is clearer now, compared to even a year ago, is that we can really blunt the worst of [Omicron] by doing the things that we know work,” Dr. Ashish Jha, the White House coronavirus response coordinator, told NPR in an interview.

That includes getting vaccinated and boosted, especially if you’re older. Most deaths from COVID-19 are occurring in people age 65 or older.

Other precautions include avoiding crowded, poorly ventilated parties, restaurants, bars and other places; testing before gathering; and, yes, putting that mask back on in risky situations. And if you do get sick, check with your doctor about getting treatment quickly.

“It is a time not to let your guard down,” warns Dr. Tina Tan, an infectious disease specialist at Northwestern University.

The good news is the worst appears to be over from the RSV surge that has been making life miserable for many children and their parents. RSV cases have been falling steadily since the end of November, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

At the same time, the flu — which also came roaring back this fall after mostly disappearing for the previous two years — looks like it’s finally receding in most places, according to the latest data out Friday from the CDC.

From Capitol Hill, Roll Call reports that Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R CA) has been elected House of Representatives speaker. The 118th Congress, therefore, is in session.

From the Rx coverage front —

STAT News reports

The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved a new Alzheimer’s disease treatment that moderately slows cognitive decline in people with early-stage disease.

The [intravenously administered] drug, called Leqembi [scientific name lecanemab], was developed by Eisai, the Japanese pharmaceutical company that also developed the first symptomatic treatment for Alzheimer’s 25 years ago.

Leqembi will cost $26,500 per year for a person of average weight, Eisai said. The drug has the potential to be a commercial blockbuster, but only if Medicare can be convinced to pay for it. Unless Medicare changes the way it pays for drugs like Leqembi, Eisai expects a relatively slow rollout. * * *

Eisai restricted the study of Leqembi to people with mild cognitive impairment or early stage Alzheimer’s that also have evidence of amyloid buildup in the brain, confirmed by an imaging scan. The FDA-approved label reflects the same narrowed patient population, estimated to encompass approximately 1 million people in the U.S., or just under 20% currently living with an Alzheimer’s diagnosis.

The label also mandates that patients undergo three additional brain scans during the first 14 weeks of treatment as a precautionary step to monitor for potentially serious brain swelling or bleeding episodes. * * *

Technically, the FDA granted accelerated approval to Leqembi, a faster path to the market based on preliminary evidence that the drug eliminates toxic amyloid. It’s the same controversial, regulatory shortcut that the FDA used to approve Aduhelm. But unlike Biogen, Eisai within days is expected to submit the cognition data from its positive, confirmatory study to the FDA, which will then consider the drug for full, or final, approval.

BioPharma Dive tells us, “The Food and Drug Administration is set to decide by April 13, 2023, whether to approve Alvotech’s biosimilar to AbbVie’s top-selling drug Humira, pending a facility inspection the company said Thursday it is trying to schedule early next year.” This keeps the drug on track to be on the market when the Humira patents are lifted on July 1, 2023.

According to a press release issued on January 5, 2023:

Synergie Medication Collective is a new medication contracting organization founded by a group of Blue Cross and Blue Shield affiliated companies to serve both Blues and select independent health plans. Synergie is focused on improving affordability and access to costly medical benefit drugs — ones that are injected or infused by a health care professional in a clinical setting — for nearly 100 million Americans. These high-cost treatments include multi-million-dollar gene therapies and infusible cancer drugs and represent a substantial portion of overall drug spend, with significant growth in future spend anticipated.

Synergie aims to significantly reduce medical benefit drug costs by establishing a more efficient contracting model based upon its collective reach and engagement with pharmaceutical manufacturers and other industry stakeholders. With a core philosophy that prioritizes partnership and transparency, Synergie aims to play a key role in ensuring affordable access to treatment for millions of people. * * *

Synergie Medication Collective will go to market in January of 2023.

STAT News reports

For only the second time since launching nearly two years ago, the AMR Action Fund has announced an investment in a fledgling biotech company as it tries to underwrite efforts to develop badly needed medicines for combating antibiotic resistance.

In its latest move, the fund is providing $7.5 million to BioVersys, which is developing an antibiotic to combat a type of bacteria that affects people with compromised immune systems and is increasingly responsible for infections in hospitalized patients. The drug, which is about to enter Phase 2 testing, is targeting hospital-acquired pneumonia, pneumonia associated with ventilators, and blood stream infections that originate from pneumonia.

From the health plan design front, EBRI released a study on cost-sharing trends for medical services from 2013-2020.

From the healthcare business front —

Beckers Hospital Review informs us.

VillageMD, which is majority owned by Walgreens Boots Alliance, completed its acquisition of Summit Health-CityMD Jan. 3, adding more than 2,800 providers to its ranks. 

News of the deal’s completion comes roughly two months after it was announced. On Nov. 7, VillageMD said it entered a definitive agreement to acquire Summit Health-CityMD for $8.9 billion with investments from Walgreens Boots Alliance and Evernorth, the health services portfolio of Cigna.

VillageMD, established in 2013, operates standalone Village Medical practices, full-size Village Medical practices alongside Walgreens pharmacies, and primary care in the home and virtually. 

The combination of Summit Health-CityMD and VillageMD creates one of the largest independent provider groups in the country, according to the companies’ news release. With the buy, VillageMD more than doubles its locations from more than 250 to more than 680 in 26 markets and grows its ranks by more than 2,800 providers. VillageMD declined to share the precise number of providers it now employs, but did say it employs more than 20,000 people. 

The addition also strengthens VillageMD’s footprint in five states. Summit Health and CityMD have locations in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and Central Oregon. 

Fierce Healthcare discusses the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed rule banning post-employment non-compete clauses in employment agreements on healthcare.

Noncompete agreements have become so ubiquitous that a proposed rule published by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) yesterday [January 5] will affect almost all industries, experts say.

Healthcare will be no exception, Carrie Amezcua, an attorney with the law firm Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, told Fierce Healthcare. She said healthcare industry executives should keep a close eye on the debate about the rule.

The public has 60 days to submit comments before the FTC can make it final.

“It could still change—it could still be challenged actually—because it goes too far from what the FTC has the authority to do,” said Amezcua, who usually represents employers in disputes over noncompete agreements.

Backlash to the rule has already begun. In a statement, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce called the regulation “blatantly unlawful.” * * *

Amezcua added: “Insurers are not exempt from the FTC Act. They would be subject to this rule in its final form. And right now, it is written as a complete ban on noncompete agreements, post-employment. You could still have a noncompete during your employment. But you can’t have the provision that says you can’t work for another company for two years after you leave.”

In closing, FedSmith updates us on federal retirement statistics for those interested.

Midweek Update

Photo by Manasvita S on Unsplash

From Capitol Hill, the Wall Street Journal reports

Kevin McCarthy and his allies launched a new round of talks late Wednesday with a small but stubborn band of conservative holdouts who have blocked his bid for House speaker, as Republicans sought a path forward following a second day of votes without a winner.

Mr. McCarthy didn’t reach the majority in of three votes on Wednesday, deepening doubts about whether he would ever be able to bring enough Republicans to his side and fueling talk of alternatives.

Twenty GOP lawmakers remained opposed, along with all Democrats, blocking the California Republican from getting the necessary majority of the full House. After the sixth vote, the House adjourned and reconvened at 8 p.m. [at which point the House voted 216 to 214 to call it a day and convene at noon on Thursday.]

A flurry of meetings were taking place by early evening with Republicans shuttling between offices. In one major concession, a McCarthy-aligned super PAC, the Congressional Leadership Fund, agreed to stop picking candidates in primaries where the seat is expected to stay in Republican hands.

From the Omicron and siblings front, we have a man bites dog story.

First Nature informs us that “COVID drug Paxlovid was hailed as a game-changer. What happened?
Insufficient investment and fears about rebound and side effects are driving dowthe n use of a lifesaving antiviral.” The FEHBlog, who has had four Covid vaccinations, points his finger at the government for promoting vaccinations, which, while helpful for older and immunocompromised folks don’t prevent the illness yet, over Paxlovid, a treatment for virtually everyone.

Here’s the twist. CNBC reports

A new antiviral pill for Covid was found to be as effective as Paxlovid at curbing mild to moderate illness among people at high risk of severe disease in a Phase 3 trial in China.

The results, published Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine, suggest that the treatment had fewer side effects than Paxlovid, the go-to antiviral for high-risk patients. Around 67% of people who took the experimental pill, called VV116, reported side effects, compared to to 77% who took Paxlovid.

The new pill was also less likely than Paxlovid to cause unexpected side effects due to reactions with other medications, such as those for insomnia, seizures or high blood pressure.

“You have a medication that looks to be just as good as Paxlovid, but less cumbersome,” said Dr. Panagis Galiatsatos, an assistant professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore.

VV116 is similar to the antiviral remdesivir, which the Food and Drug Administration has approved as an IV infusion. But the team behind the new drug — pharma companies Junshi Biosciences and Vigonvita Life Science — tweaked the formula so that the body can absorb it in pill form, said Dr. Peter Gulick, an associate professor of medicine at Michigan State University. Gilead Sciences, which developed remdesivir, is testing a similar oral version of its drug.

From the Rx coverage front —

  • STAT News reports “Walgreens plans to seek certification to begin providing abortion pills under new Food and Drug Administration rules that allow the drugs to be distributed by retail pharmacies, the company told STAT on Wednesday.” P.S. FEHB plans can only cover abortion drugs when abortion is necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape.
  • The Drug Channels blog tells us

For 2022, brand-name drugs’ net prices dropped for an unprecedented fifth consecutive year. What’s more, after adjusting for overall inflation, brand-name drug net prices plunged by almost 9%.

The factors behind declining drug prices will remain in the coming years—and become even stronger due to forthcoming changes in Medicare and Medicaid. Employers, health plans, and PBMs will determine whether patients will share in this ongoing deflation.

Read on for details and make up your own mind. And please pass the news along to the drug pricing flat earthers (#DPFE) who refuse to accept that brand-name drug prices are falling—or that prescription drug spending is a small and stable portion of overall U.S. healthcare expenditures.

  • Health Payer Intelligence tells us

Insulin costs vary based on insurance coverage type and coverage types that lead to high healthcare spending can force patients to ration their insulin supplies, a report from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) uncovered.

Healthcare spending for individuals who have diabetes—including diabetes treatment, comorbidities, preventive care, and more—amounted to approximately $446 billion total in 2019. Drug costs, including spending on insulin, were responsible for nearly a third of that amount (32 percent).

Insulin users, who tend to be in a more severe stage of the disease, contributed 46 percent of the healthcare spending total among patients with diabetes. Average healthcare spending across the population of insulin users is 4.3 times higher than for non-institutionalized Americans. * * *

Medicare beneficiaries had the highest total out-of-pocket healthcare spending for the drug when compared to privately insured and uninsured individuals’ costs. Medicaid out-of-pocket healthcare spending on insulin was low and hard to estimate.

Most insulin users have either Medicare coverage (52 percent) or private insurance (33 percent). The remainder was covered by Medicaid or reported being uninsured.

It’s worth adding that Medicare covers insulin under Medicare Part B, not Part D.

From the U.S healthcare front —

  • The American Hospital Association relates “U.S. hospitals and health systems continued to experience negative operating margins through November 2022, Kaufman Hall reported today. Median operating margins were down 44% so far this year compared with 2021, as high labor and other costs continued to outpace revenues, according to data from over 900 hospitals.”
  • BioPharma Dive reports “Moderna said Wednesday it will pay $85 million to buy OriCiro Genomics, describing the company’s tools as “best in class” for the synthesis of plasmid DNA.”

From the telehealth front

  • The Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research released a report on the use of telehealth during the Covid era.
  • The Society for Human Resource Management reminds us “Employers [sponsoring health plans including FEHB plans] will have the option to provide pre-deductible coverage of telehealth services for people with high-deductible health plans for another two years [through December 31, 2024].

From the No Surprises Act front, Health Dive digs into the recent CMS report on first-year experience with the NSA’s arbitration process.

The report from regulators provides insight on how the arbitration system is faring so far. It helps paint a picture of how frequently the portal is being used and the types of services payers and providers found themselves fighting over. It also shows what providers have initiated the most disputes.

The vast majority of disputes originated from emergency room visits.

About 81% of disputes (excluding air ambulance services) started in the emergency room.

The entities that initiated the most [arbitrations] were mainly physician staffing and revenue cycle management firms, including TeamHealth and Envision Healthcare, private equity backed practices that staff emergency rooms around the country. As a business strategy, the two work out of network, which can lead to surprise billing if the hospital remains in network, according to a prior study from Yale researchers.

The 10 groups that submitted the most disputes accounted for 75% of all the disputes involving out-of-network emergency services and non-emergency items.

From the public health front, “the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) released the results of its annual National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), which shows how people living in America reported about their experience with mental health conditions, substance use, and pursuit of treatment in 2021. The 2021 NSDUH national report includes selected estimates by race, ethnicity, and age group. It is the most comprehensive report on substance use and mental health indicators that SAMHSA has released to date.” This HHS announcement summarizes the survey’s findings.

From the OPM front, Federal News Network reports on OPM’s plans to refresh its website, which in the FEHBlog’s opinion can’t come soon enough. “Aside from overhauling its main website, OPM is also planning to make more updates to its retirement services. It’s the area of the agency that encompasses the most legacy — or outdated — technology in all of OPM, [an OPM spokesperson] said. Bravo.

The 118th Congress Convenes

Photo by Michele Orallo on Unsplash

From our Nation’s Capital, Roll Call informs us

A bloc of [twenty] Republican opponents Tuesday kept Kevin McCarthy from becoming speaker on three ballots, and the House adjourned to come back on Wednesday and try again to pick a leader.

McCarthy, R-Calif., had told his colleagues as the day began he would not back down, and his supporters said there would be repeated votes. After three votes, the last of which saw McCarthy lose one of his earlier supporters, a motion from McCarthy ally Tom Cole of Oklahoma to adjourn until noon Wednesday was adopted by voice vote.

Roll Call adds

The history-making chaos in the House drew most of the attention Tuesday, but longtime senators were making history of their own.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., was elected as the first woman to serve in the constitutional office of president pro tempore, while Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell eclipsed Montana Democratic Sen. Mike Mansfield’s record for length of service as a party floor leader. * * *

And not to be outdone, [Sen. Chuck] Schumer had some history of his own, becoming the longest serving senator from the state of New York.

STAT News reports

The nation’s health agencies already have a long to-do list for 2023.

Top officials have promised reforms in the food, drug, and public health departments as frustrations mount over the federal response to Covid-19 and last year’s widespread baby formula shortages. Biden administration appointees are racing to fix pandemic-exposed cracks in the systems for mental health care, addiction treatment, and health coverage, even as millions of people are likely to be kicked out of Medicaid, the federal program serving low-income people with few resources. There’s still no one leading the National Institutes of Health.

And while Congress delivered many of the president’s requests in the end-of-year spending package last month, it also dropped several provisions that would have given federal health regulators more authority. 

From the New Years predictions front, STAT News informs us

For almost three years, hospitals and health insurers have been riding the waves of the Covid-19 pandemic. Even though they can better predict what lies ahead in 2023, there remain several big unknowns. STAT’s business reporters will be paying attention to three trends in particular: the end of the public health emergency, how hospital price hikes will affect people’s paychecks, and Medicare Advantage’s explosive growth.

From the pricing transparency front, Kaiser Health News reminds us that

As of Jan. 1, health insurers and employers that offer health plans [including FEHB plans] must provide online calculators for patients to get detailed estimates of what they will owe — taking into account deductibles and copayments — for a range of services and drugs. * * *

So how will it work?

Patients, knowing they need a specific treatment, drug, or medical service, first log on to the cost estimator on a website offered through their insurer or, for some, their employer. Next, they can search for the care they need by billing code, which many patients may not have; or by a general description, like “repair of knee joint,” or “MRI of abdomen.” They can also enter a hospital’s or physician’s name or the dosage amount of a drug for which they are seeking price information.

Not all drugs or services will be available in the first year of the tools’ rollout, but the required 500-item list covers a wide swath of medical services, from acne surgery to X-rays.

Once the information is entered, the calculators are supposed to produce real-time estimates of a patient’s out-of-pocket cost.

Starting in 2024, the requirement on insurers expands to include all drugs and services.

This requirement was created by the 2020 Transparency in Coverage Rule issued under the 21st Century Cures Act and the 2021 No Surprises Act.

On a related note, Health Leaders Media tells us

According to the recent report by the OIG investigating instances of incorrect co-surgery and assistant-at-surgery modifier usage, 69 of 100 sampled procedural services did not meet federal requirements.

An additional review of 127 corresponding services found that 49% were noncompliant with federal requirements, as well.

The OIG reviewed a randomly selected sample of 100 services rendered by Part B providers between 2017 and 2019 with certain CPT procedural codes and a Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) co-surgery indicator of 1 or 2. The reviewed procedures included spinal fusions, knee replacements, and endovascular repairs, among others.

That’s a big bowl of wrong.

From the pricing reforms front, Fierce Healthcare relates

Physician group practices participating in the Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative garnered cost savings for the top five conditions that require medical intervention but did not save money for the top five surgical procedures.

On the other hand, hospitals participating in the BPCI initiative saved money for both categories, according to a study in JAMA Health Forum.  

Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania said their findings underscore the “suitability of hospitals to bundled payment models, specifically highlighting their relative advantage over group practices in achieving cost and potential quality outcomes for medical conditions.”

From the Rx coverage front —

  • Biopharma Dive offers us a look back at the FDA’s drug approvals in 2022 — “The agency’s main review office cleared 37 new medicines last year, its lowest total since 2016 and well below 2021’s mark of 50.” — and a look forward at ten clinical trials to watch in the first half of 2023 — “Highly anticipated study results are expected in Alzheimer’s, obesity and Huntington’s disease, while a pair of high-priced acquisitions could be put to the test.”
  • STAT News has questions stemming from the recent Congressional investigative report on the Aduhelm fiasco.
  • The New York Times reports “For the first time, retail pharmacies, from corner drugstores to major chains like CVS and Walgreens, will be allowed to offer abortion pills in the United States under a regulatory change made Tuesday by the Food and Drug Administration. The action could significantly expand access to abortion through medication. * * * Whether large pharmacy chains and local drugstores would opt to make the pills available was not immediately clear Tuesday. A spokesman for Walgreens, Fraser Engerman, said: “We are going to review the F.D.A.’s decision.”
  • The Wall Street Journal adds “Most abortions in the U.S. happen via the pill, according to the Guttmacher Institute. Several organizations that mail abortion pills, sometimes to women in states with abortion bans, have seen shipments increase since the Supreme Court’s latest abortion decision. * * * Also on Tuesday, the Justice Department issued an opinion saying that abortion pills can be sent through the U.S. mail, as long as the sender doesn’t intend them to be used unlawfully. The U.S. Postal Service and the Department of Health and Human Services had asked the Justice Department to clarify an 1873 law, which had been invoked by Mississippi’s attorney general in a lawsuit last year, that prohibits mailing items that can be used to produce abortions.”

From the mental healthcare front, the American Hospital Association places a spotlight on children and adolescent care.

Friday Stats and More

Photo by Sincerely Media on Unsplash

The CDC’s Covid Data Tracker for the week ended December 29, 2022, informs us:

  • New Covid cases totaled 402,525, down 84,000 cases from the previous week.
  • The daily average of new Covid hospital admissions was 5,,668 up 3.7% from the previous week.
  • New Covid deaths totaled 2,530, down 400 deaths from the previous week.
  • 17.3% of the U.S. population aged 18 and older and 37.5% of the U.S. population aged 65 and older have received the bivalent booster.

The CDC’s weekly Fluview tells us

  • Seasonal influenza activity remains high but continues to decline in most areas.
  • Of influenza A viruses detected and subtyped during week 51, 83% were influenza A(H3N2) and 17% were influenza A(H1N1).
  • Fourteen influenza-associated pediatric deaths were reported this week, for a total of 61 pediatric flu deaths reported so far this season.
  • CDC estimates that, so far this season, there have been at least 20 million illnesses, 210,000 hospitalizations, and 13,000 deaths from flu.
  • The cumulative hospitalization rate in the FluSurv-NET system was more than 4 times higher than the highest cumulative in-season hospitalization rate observed for week 51 during previous seasons going back to 2010-2011. However, this in-season rate is still lower than end-of-season hospitalization rates for all but 4 pre-COVID-19-pandemic seasons going back to 2010-2011.
  • The number of flu hospital admissions reported in the HHS Protect system decreased nationally from the week prior for the third week in a row.

From the No Surprises Act front, STAT News reports

Health care providers are swamping the government with billing disputes under the new law that bans surprise medical bills. So far, just 4% have ended in payment. 

That’s according to the Biden administration’s progress report on the No Surprises Act’s so-called independent dispute resolution (IDR) process, in which mediators help out-of-network providers and insurers decide appropriate payment amounts for services. So far, the government is fielding a much higher volume of requests than expected, mostly related to emergency services. Health care providers, air ambulance providers, and companies working for them submitted about 90,000 out-of-network payment disputes between April 15 and Sept. 30, far more than the roughly 17,000 anticipated in a full year. 

Also exceeding expectations is the complexity of the cases and the time it’s taking to reach resolutions, which has led to a severe backlog of disputes awaiting resolution. Of the roughly 23,000 cases closed so far, mediators made payment determinations in about 3,600 — 4% of the 90,000 submissions.

In the FEHBlog’s opinion, providers and payers should focus on resolving cases at the initial open negotiation phase. Last week, the NSA regulators announced that the administration cost for one arbitration would increase from $50 to $350 per party, which should encourage payers and providers to reach the FEHBlog’s conclusion.

From the public health front, the Hill relates according to a new CDC report


  • About 526,000 young Americans could have both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes by 2060, up from 213,000 in 2017 

  • The expected surge is alarming health officials, who say the increase will disproportionately affect minority populations.

  • A potential factor behind the trend could be an increase in childhood obesity.

These statistics place in context this STAT News story titled “Wegovy [Novo Nordisk’s latest obesity drug] may help teens with obesity lose weight but isn’t a magic bullet.”

“I’m concerned that doctors are going to rush to judgment and employ a medication that is very expensive and has its own side effects without giving proper consideration of what the actual cause of the problem is,” said Robert Lustig, professor emeritus of pediatrics at the University of California, San Francisco. Wegovy costs more than $1,300 per month and can cause nausea, vomiting, and rare cases of pancreatitis.

Lustig said each teen’s obesity is caused by different genetic, environmental, and behavioral factors and requires tailored treatment. He worries that widespread use of Wegovy could lead physicians to overlook the root causes of an individual’s condition.

“Treating the downstream symptoms of the problem is only putting a Band-Aid on the problem, it’s not fixing the problem,” Lustig said. “I’m worried that Wegovy is a Band-Aid.”

Since Wegovy, Saxenda, and other drugs are meant to be taken over the long term to maintain weight loss — potentially the rest of an individual’s life — teenagers would be on the medication for an especially long time, and there isn’t yet information on the effects of the drug over that time span, Lustig added.

The FEHBlog did not realize that these are long-term drugs.

In other Rx coverage news, the Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday

approved Briumvi (ublituximab-xiiy) injection for treating patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (RMS) in adults. Researchers demonstrated Briumvi’s efficacy in two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, active comparator-controlled clinical trials of identical design, in patients with RMS treated for 96 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive either Briumvi or teriflunomide, the active comparator. The primary outcome of both studies was the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over the treatment period. In both studies, Briumvi significantly lowered the ARR compared to teriflunomide. The most common adverse reactions were infusion reactions, including fever, chills, headache, influenza-like illness, elevated heart rate, nausea, throat irritation, reddening of the skin (erythema) and an anaphylactic (allergic) reaction; infections including serious and fatal bacterial, fungal, and new or reactivated viral infections and reduction in immunoglobulins.

From the miscellany department

  • Govexec reports on the Postmaster General’s plans for next year.
  • Milliman suggests “how to understand and impact health plan administrative expenses.”
  • The New York Times Morning column provides good year-end news: After spiking in 2020 and 2021, murders in large U.S. cities had decreased more than 5% this year and gun deaths, injuries, and mass shootings are also down this year. The Times attributes the drop to Covid’s transition to endemic status.

Thursday Miscellany

Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

The Washington Examiner reports that “President Joe Biden signed the nearly $2 trillion omnibus spending bill into law Thursday night while vacationing in St. Croix.”

The New York Times relates,

The Food and Drug Administration’s process for approving the Alzheimer’s drug Aduhelm, despite great uncertainty about whether it worked, was “rife with irregularities,” according to a congressional investigation released on Thursday. The agency’s actions “raise serious concerns about F.D.A.’s lapses in protocol,” the report concluded.

The 18-month investigation, initiated by two congressional committees after the F.D.A. approved the drug, also strongly criticized Biogen, Aduhelm’s manufacturer. Internal documentsshowed the company set “an unjustifiably high price” of $56,000 a year for Aduhelm because it wanted a history-making “blockbuster” to “establish Aduhelm as one of the top pharmaceutical launches of all time,” even though it knew the high price would burden Medicare and patients, the report found.

STAT News seconds the Times report:

The downfall of Aduhelm, the first new treatment for Alzheimer’s disease in two decades, is largely the story of a drug company choosing to maximize its potential profits at the expense of patients and taxpayers, according to a congressional investigation that cites thousands of pages of internal Biogen documents.

STAT News also presents eight key takeaway‘s from the Congressional report on Aduhelm’s approval and reports

Pfizer said Thursday that its experimental gene therapy for hemophilia B significantly reduced the number of bleeds patients experienced over a year. 

Data from the 45-patient trial could set the stage for a second gene therapy to be approved for patients with the rare and serious bleeding disorder in as many years. In November, UniQure won approval for Hemgenix, the first hemophilia B gene therapy. 

“The results from this long-awaited study are great news for hemophilia B patients that soon may have access to a second durable treatment option,” Luk Vandenberghe, a gene therapy expert at Harvard, said in a text message, after reviewing the results. 

Looking toward next year, STAT News discusses “three things to watch in chronic disease in 2023: obesity drugs, long Covid and health care costs.”

Consider the already-astronomical cost of chronic disease care in the United States: trillions of dollars devoted to diabetes, heart disease, kidney disease, cancer and other conditions, and still so many people unable to access necessary care and treatments. Consider the strain of Covid on the health care system, the decimation of public health staffing, and the scarcity of health care workers — and how all these costs make their way to patients. What bold moves can be made in 2023 to help reduce the cost of care? We’ll see.

Also, from the healthcare cost front, Beckers Hospital Review looks into “Questions about hospitals’ culture, leadership, survival and opportunity come with a trillion-dollar price tag given the importance of hospitals and health systems in the $4.3 trillion U.S. healthcare industry.” 

From the public health front, the Wall Street Journal reports

A measles outbreak among mostly unvaccinated children in Ohio that local health officials feared could take months to control has slowed in the past week, giving hope that what was expected to be a lengthy battle could be cut short.

The total number of cases since the outbreak began in November reached 82 on Thursday, but new cases have fallen off significantly in the last seven days or so, said Mysheika Roberts, Health Commissioner for the city of Columbus.

“It could be much worse,” Dr. Roberts said Thursday. “I’m hoping due to our outreach in the community, and the community’s willingness to roll up their sleeves and get vaccinated, that we might be starting to see the end of this. But obviously, it’ll take several weeks and days before we’ll know if this is actually over.”

From the Rx coverage front, Medscape tells us

Merck & Co Inc’s COVID antiviral molnupiravir speeds up recovery but does not reduce the hospitalisation or death rate in higher-risk vaccinated adults, detailed data from a large study showed on Thursday. * * *

When Merck originally tested molnupiravir, it was found 30% effective in reducing hospitalisations, but that was in unvaccinated patients.

In the latest study, led by University of Oxford researchers, nearly all of the more than 25,000 patients in the study had received at least three vaccine doses.

These results demonstrate that vaccine protection is so strong that there is no obvious benefit from the drug in terms of further reducing hospitalisation and deaths, said study co-author Jonathan Van-Tam from the University of Nottingham.

The drug was, however, effective in reducing viral load and can help hasten patient recovery by roughly four days, researchers estimated based on study data. 

In interesting social news,

About 2.6 million couples are saying “I do” this year [2022] — roughly 600,000 more than in prepandemic years, according to The Knot, a company that offers wedding-planning tools, a vendor marketplace and a gift-registry platform. 

The wedding boom is the byproduct of two years of the pandemic, when many ceremonies were postponed or pared down, says Lauren Kay, executive editor of The Knot. And ceremonies this year have a whole new vibe. Now, “people feel empowered to personalize, push the envelope—rules are out the window,” Mrs. Kay says. * * *

This year, “weddings are back, and people are excited to celebrate,” Mrs. Kay says. In 2023, weddings in the U.S. will likely return to prepandemic levels at 2.1 million, according to internal research from The Knot.

  • The Washington Post looks into “Why do people like being tipsy? Here’s how alcohol affects the brain. The buzz produced by alcohol comes from a cocktail of pharmacology and social ingredients, research shows.” The article also discusses how to enjoy alcoholic beverages responsibly.

Finally, the Department of Health and Human Services announced

a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), entitled Safeguarding the Rights of Conscience as Protected by Federal Statutes, which proposes to restore the longstanding process for the handling of conscience complaints and provide additional safeguards to protect against conscience and religious discrimination. * * *

Public comments on the NPRM are due 60 days after publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register.

The NPRM may be viewed here: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/conscience-rule-nprm.pdf – PDF