Happy Days are Here Again!

OPM

Happy Days are Here Again!

David Ermer–AHRQ, CDC, CMS, COVID-19, COVID-19 testing, COVID-19 vaccine, Federal employment benefits, NIH, OPM, U.S. Healthcare–
OPM Headquarters a/k/a the Theodore Roosevelt Building

The FEHBlog was delighted to read today that OPM is encouraging FEHB carriers that OPM is encouraging FEHB carriers to incorporate Medicare Part D EGWPs in their plans for 2024. The FEHBlog has been encouraging this step for years, as readers must know.

The Medicare Part D EGWPs will cushion the FEHBP against the expenses of drugs to treat Alzheimer’s Disease and other illnesses that impact annuitants over age 65. While there are many factors at play in determining premiums, this factor standing alone would lower premiums. Thank you, OPM.

From the Omicron and siblings front, the New York Times virus briefing newsletter wished its readers well today.

Now, after three years, we’re pausing this newsletter. The acute phase of the pandemic has faded in much of the world, and many of us have tried to pick up the pieces and move on. We promise to return to your inbox if the pandemic takes a sharp turn. But, for now, this is goodbye.

The American Hospital Association informs us

In a study released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC}, a single bivalent COVID-19 vaccine booster provided additional protection against omicron XBB variants in adults who previously received two to four monovalent vaccine doses. XBB-related variants account for over half of currently circulating COVID-19 variants in the United States.

“All persons should stay up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccines, including receiving a bivalent booster dose when eligible,” the authors conclude.

and

The CDC yesterday launched a website to help consumers locate no-cost COVID-19 testing through its Increasing Community Access to Testing program, which includes pharmacies, commercial laboratories and other sites that bill the tests to government and private insurers and focus on vulnerable communities. The tests may include laboratory-based nucleic acid amplification tests and rapid antigen point-of-care tests, with results typically provided in 24-48 hours.

From the public health front

  • The Hill tells us about a CDC internal reorganization.
  • The HHS Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research provides us with an infographic and report about the three most commonly treated illnesses among older adults — hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and arthritis / other joint disorders
  • Fierce Healthcare relates, “The Biden administration is planning to release three to four new payment models on advance primary care and another enabling states to assume the total cost of care for Medicare, a top official shared.”
  • HHS’s HEAL Program Director, Dr. Rebecca Baker, discusses “Research That Offers Hope to End Addiction Long-Term.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front

Healthcare Dive reports

Elevance Health, one of the nation’s largest insurers, added more members in 2022, fueled by growth in its government business thanks to continued relaxed eligibility rules on enrollment.  

Elevance ended the year covering 47.5 million people, a nearly 5% increase from the prior-year period, driven largely by growth in Medicaid members.

In turn, total revenue climbed 13% to nearly $157 billion for the year as the insurer collected higher premium revenue from its Medicaid plans.   

Net income dipped about 1% to $6 billion for the full year as expenses climbed about 14%.  

and

The CMS announced Wednesday that a record-breaking 16.3 million people signed up for Affordable Care Act marketplace plans during the 2023 open enrollment season, a result of extended pandemic-era subsidies enacted by the American Rescue Plan.

Over 1.8 million more people enrolled in marketplace coverage compared to last year — a 13% increase, and the most amount of plan selections of any year since the launch of the ACA marketplace a decade ago, according to the CMS. The record-breaking enrollment numbers include 3.6 million first-time marketplace enrollees.

STAT News tells us

The claims have become almost ubiquitous. Hospital CEO after hospital CEO stands at a podium and promises the merger being announced will improve quality and lower costs.

Once deals close, though, there tends to be little, if any, follow-up to determine whether those things actually happened. A new Journal of the American Medical Association study adds to the growing body of evidence that they don’t. The authors looked across a large swath of the country’s hospitals and physicians found that while quality did improve marginally, the prices paid for services delivered by health system hospitals and doctors was significantly higher than their non-system peers.

“You start to feel really hopeful when you hear about this, ‘Yeah, we can really improve health care,’ and then when you look at it, it’s just not there,” said Nancy Beaulieu, a study author and research associate in Harvard Medical School’s department of health care policy.

Ruh roh.

On related note, Fierce Healthcare informs us

A top insurance lobbying group plans to press Congress this session to adopt legislation that expands the footprint of site-neutral payment reform, setting up a likely clash with hospital groups. 

The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association (BCBSA), which represents 38 Blues plans, released several policy priorities for the current Congress as part of a new report Tuesday. Some of the policies focus on changing Medicare reimbursement rates to pay the same amount to clinics whether they are independent or affiliated with a hospital. Other reforms focus on prescription drugs and spurring more participation in value-based care. 

“We’re very concerned about the increasing acquisition of physician practices by hospitals in the healthcare system,” said Kris Haltmeyer, vice president of policy analysis for BCBSA, during a reporter briefing Tuesday. 

One of the association’s major priorities is to pass a bill that would remove a grandfathering provision in the 2015 Balanced Budget Act. The provision shielded certain hospital outpatient departments from billing limits established in the law, with the exception of emergency departments. 

The association also wants to require off-campus hospital sites to get a different national provider identifier than the main facility campus. They should also use a different claim form for any professional service rendered in an office or clinic owned by a hospital but not on the campus. 

Go get ’em.

Monday Roundup

David Ermer–COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccine, FDA, OPM, Rx coverage, SCOTUS, SDOH, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Sven Read on Unsplash

From the Omicron and siblings front, the Wall Street Journal reports

Most people would get one Covid-19 shot annually—as they do with the flu shot—under Food and Drug Administration proposals for simplifying the nation’s Covid-19 vaccine procedures.

The drug regulator also proposed that people getting vaccinated for the first time receive vaccines that target both Omicron and the original strain of the coronavirus. 

The proposals, outlined in materials the FDA released Monday, would mark the biggest changes to Covid-19 vaccinations since boosters rolled out and are a sign of the nation’s shift to a more endemic-like approach to the coronavirus.

Vaccine experts who advise the FDA are scheduled to meet Thursday to discuss the proposals. The advisers are scheduled to vote on whether to give the bivalent shot as the initial inoculation, as is already allowed in Europe.

Makes sense to the FEHBlog.

From the OPM front, the House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) has sent OPM Director Kiran Ahuja a letter demanding documents and a staff briefing on the recent GAO report criticizing OPM’s internal controls over family member eligibility in the FEHBP. Here’s a little free advice for my favorite agency. Rather than coming up with your own solutions, adopt solutions that have been proven to work in the private sector — the HIPAA 820 standard enrollment transaction which ties premium payments to enrollees and dependent eligibility verification audits based on statistical sampling.

From the U.S. healthcare business front —

Fierce Healthcare informs us

Elevance Health has inked a deal to acquire Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana, with the Pelican State insurer joining the Anthem Blue Cross affiliated plans.

The acquisition builds on an existing partnership between the two insurers, according to the announcement. The two jointly own Healthy Blue, a plan that serves Medicaid and dual-eligible beneficiaries. 

The combination will also allow BCBSLA to accelerate its push toward improved access, affordability and quality for its 1.9 million members, thanks to the capabilities of Elevance Health’s Carelon subsidiary, the companies said. More than $4 billion has been invested in Carelon over the past several years, building out its behavioral health, complex and chronic care programs and digital health models.

and

CVS Health has named two key leaders for its pharmacy and consumer products business, including a returning face to the company, according to a report from Bloomberg.

David Joyner, a former executive at the company, will make a return as the leader of its pharmacy services segment, which includes the Caremark pharmacy benefit manager, people familiar with the matter told the outlet. Joyner left CVS three years ago and will succeed Alan Lotvin, M.D., who is set to retire.

In addition, former Express Scripts President Amy Bricker will join the company as the chief product officer for the consumer segment, which centers on developing new products for CVS’ consumer health brands, Bloomberg reported.

Fierce Healthcare points out a twist in the second story.

That Bricker had departed Express Scripts, a subsidiary of Cigna, was revealed last week when the PBM announced it had named a new president, veteran supply chain leader Adam Kautzner. What was next for Bricker, however, was conspicuously absent from the announcement.

The FEHBlog often counsels clients on Family and Medical Leave Act issues. He had no idea until today that the Labor Department offers helpful information to healthcare provider and employees on this law. For example,

This background information can fill knowledge gaps for employers too.

From the Rx coverage front —

  • The Washington Post reports on the reaction to “the American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, based on decades of scientific research, call[ing] for early and aggressive treatment, instead of “watchful waiting.” They urge intensive therapy for children as young as 6, weight loss drugs for those as young as 12 and surgery for teens as young as 13.”
  • The Institute for Clinical and Economic Research released a

Final Evidence Report on Fezolinetant for Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause

— Independent appraisal committee voted that evidence is not yet adequate to demonstrate a net health benefit for fezolinetant when compared to no pharmacological treatment —

—  Using point estimates from short-term clinical trials, analyses suggest this drug would achieve common thresholds for cost-effectiveness if priced between $2,000 – $2,600 per year for women who cannot or choose not to take menopausal hormone therapy —

— All stakeholders have a responsibility and an important role to play in ensuring that women have access to effective new treatment options for symptoms of menopause

The ICER upshot is “Given that many patients may benefit from readily available, effective, and low cost [menopausal hormone therapy] MHT, clinical experts agreed that it would be reasonable for payers to require prescriber attestation that patients are not appropriate candidates for MHT prior to prescribing fezolinetant.”

From the SDOH front, Health Leaders Media tells us about new ICD-10 diagnosis codes with an SDOH emphasis which will take effect on April 1, 2023.

From the telehealth front, U.S. News reports,

Despite distance and occasional technical glitches, a new study finds that most patients like seeing a surgeon for the first time via video.

The study was published Jan. 19 in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons. * * *

The study included 387 patients who participated in first-time visits between May 2021 and June 2022 at general surgery clinics across the Vanderbilt system. Researchers used a standard questionnaire to look at the quality of shared decision-making and asked patients and surgeons open-ended questions about their consultations.

In all, 77.8% of patients had an in-person visit, while 22.2% saw their doctor remotely.

Both groups reported high levels of quality communication during these appointments.

Levels of shared decision-making and quality of communication were similar between remote visits and in-person care, the study found.

In responding to the open-ended questions, patients praised the convenience and usefulness of telehealth appointments. Researchers received some negative comments about technical difficulties and not being physically present.

Thursday Miscellany

David Ermer–AHRQ, Congress, COVID-19, FDA, Federal employment benefits, Medicare, Mental health care, No Surprises Act, OPM, Rx coverage, Telehealth–
Photo by Josh Mills on Unsplash

From our Nation’s capital, the Wall Street Journal reports

The Treasury Department began taking special measures to keep paying the government’s bills on Thursday as the U.S. bumped up against its borrowing limit, kicking off a potentially lengthy and difficult debate in Congress over raising the debt ceiling. 

With the federal government constrained by the roughly $31.4 trillion debt limit, the Treasury Department began deploying so-called extraordinary measures. Those accounting maneuvers, which include suspending investments for certain government accounts, will allow the Treasury to keep paying obligations to bondholders, Social Security recipients and others until at least early June, the department said last week.  

That gives lawmakers on Capitol Hill and the Biden administration roughly five months to pass legislation raising or suspending the debt limit. In a letter to congressional leaders on Thursday, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said there was “considerable uncertainty” about how long extraordinary measures can last. 

“I respectfully urge Congress to act promptly to protect the full faith and credit of the United States,” Ms. Yellen said. 

From the OPM front, OPM issued “Guidance on Increasing Opportunities for Federal Internships, Fellowships, and Other Early Career Programs” and, according to MeriTalk, held a “virtual job fair organized today by Tech to Gov in partnership with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is targeting a wide range of Federal government technology and related positions as part of the government’s goal to restock its tech ranks amid a slowdown in hiring by the private sector.” As daily reports of layoffs at tech companies have been appearing in the news, OPM’s timing for the job fair is opportune.

Today, benefits expert Tammy Flanagan completed her three Govexec columns on federal employee and annuitant benefit changes for this year.

From the Omicron and siblings front,

MedPage Today tells us, “Real-World Data Support Bivalent COVID-19 Boosters in Older Adults — Study from Israel showa ed high level of protection in people 65 and up.” MedPage Today’s medical editor in chief Dr. Jeremy Faust comments

[T]he Israeli data really helps us understand that for 65-years-olds and over, getting a bivalent booster is going to protect against hospitalization. We don’t know how long that’s going to last, and that’s the key. If it turns out that the bivalent booster ends up having a much longer tail of effectiveness than the monovalent did, that’ll be good news, but it’ll depend upon what variants are circulating and other factors, but we are watching that.

Reuters adds

The European Union’s drug regulator has not identified any safety signals in the region related to U.S. drugmaker Pfizer Inc (PFE.N) and German partner BioNTech’s updated COVID-19 shot, the agency said on Wednesday.

On Friday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention said that a safety monitoring system had flagged that the shot could possibly be linked to a type of brain stroke in older adults, according to preliminary data.

The FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee will consider this safety issue at a meeting on January 26.

Also from the FDA front, the Wall Street Journal informs us

U.S. drug regulators rejected Eli Lilly & Co.’s proposed new Alzheimer’s disease treatment, saying they need more data from clinical testing, according to the company.

The setback could delay a potential commercial introduction of the highly anticipated drug by at least several months, if the Food and Drug Administration eventually decides to approve it. * * *

The agency had recently approved another Alzheimer’s therapy. Earlier this month, the FDA gave early approval to a new Alzheimer’s drug from Eisai Co. and Biogen Inc.

Lilly had been hoping for an accelerated FDA approval of donanemab early this year. Now, a midyear filing of a standard drug application means an FDA decision could be pushed back into 2024, based on typical FDA timelines of taking six to 10 months to review new drug applications.

The American Hospital Association relates

In an online survey last November of 1,200 U.S. adults previously vaccinated against COVID-19, 62% had not yet received a bivalent booster dose, most often because they did not know they were eligible or the booster was available, or believed they were immune against infection, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported today. After viewing information about eligibility and availability, over two-thirds of them planned to get a bivalent booster and 29% reported receiving the booster in a follow-up survey in December. To help increase bivalent booster coverage, the report recommends using evidence-based strategies to inform patients about booster recommendations and waning immunity.

From the No Surprises Act front, Healthcare Dive points out

  • Many Americans are still exposed to the potential for a surprise medical bill from an out-of-network ambulance ride, a research report published in Health Affairs found. About 28% of emergency trips in a ground ambulance resulted in a potential surprise bill, according to the research that analyzed commercial insurance claims.
  • About 85% of emergency transports were deemed out of network between 2014 and 2017, researchers found. But two-thirds of those trips are paid in full by insurers, eliminating the risk of a surprise bill.
  • The report shows the difference in pricing by ground ambulance ownership and how that affects patients’ financial exposure. * * *
  • Given the high prevalence for a potential surprise bill, protections like those afforded to consumers in the No Surprises Act may be necessary for both emergency and non-emergency transports, the authors said.

The FEHBlog is puzzled by the author’s extension of NSA protection to non-emergency transports, which the consumer should have time to manage. Congress should not overload the NSA system.

From the telehealth front, Healthcare Dive reports

  • Private insurers paid roughly the same for telehealth and in-person visits during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic as virtual care surged, according to new research from the Kaiser Family Foundation.
  • Though it’s unclear how payment rates might have changed over the past two years, the findings call into question the argument that telehealth is saving the healthcare system money, researchers said.
  • However, researchers said that perks of telehealth included expanded access and convenience — cost benefits of which were not factored into the study.

Fierce Healthcare tells us

UnitedHealthcare is rolling out a new virtual behavioral health coaching program backed by Optum.

The offering is available as of Jan. 1 for 5 million fully insured members, and self-insured employers can purchase the program as an employer benefit. Through the program, adults with symptoms of mild depression, stress and anxiety can access support for their mental health needs through virtual modules as well as one-on-one video conferences, phone calls or messaging with coaches. * * *

Members who use virtual coaching can connect with a dedicated behavioral health coach for a 30-minute weekly audio or video call and can chat with their coach using in-app messaging between sessions.

The program lasts eight weeks, and each member will complete an assessment at the onset to identify their individual needs. Coaches use cognitive behavioral therapy techniques to assist the patient in crafting an action plan that is personalized to them.

In other UHC news, Beckers Payer Issues relates

The largest employer of physicians in the United States is not HCA, the VA, or Kaiser Permanente — it’s UnitedHealth Group’s Optum.

With at least 60,000 employed or aligned physicians across 2,000 locations in 2023, Optum has cemented itself at the forefront of the quickly changing healthcare delivery landscape. For comparison, Bloomberg reported in 2021 that Ascension employs or is affiliated with 49,000 physicians, HCA has 47,000 and Kaiser has 24,000.

Given that the Affordable Care Act limits health insurers, but not healthcare providers, profits, UHC made a smart move, in the FEHBlog’s opinion.

From the Rx coverage front, STAT News tells us

In a bid to blunt competition and address rising drug costs, Sanofi is offering a warranty that will cover the cost for any hospital if a specific medicine fails to work, marking only the second time a major pharmaceutical company has taken such a step.

In this instance, Sanofi designed a warranty program for its Cablivi medication, which is used to treat aTTP, a rare, life-threatening autoimmune blood disorder that is considered a medical emergency. The cost will be refunded for up to six doses for patients who fail to initially respond or up to 12 doses for patients whose condition worsens.

The move comes after Pfizer began offering warranties for two of its medicines, the first of which debuted in August 2021. At the time, the Pfizer effort was the first of its kind in the pharmaceutical industry. Unlike the Sanofi warranty, however, the Pfizer programs offer refunds to patients — not hospitals — if the medicines fail to work sufficiently.

Although the approaches vary, both companies are signaling their interest in differentiating themselves from competitors, not just responding to complaints about the rising cost of medicines, according to Emad Samad, president of Octaviant Financial, a firm that is promoting the use of warranties in the pharmaceutical industry.

How would these warranties redound to the benefit of third party payers?

From the miscellany front

  • Cigna offers a paper about “Digging into the Unique Drivers and Healthy Behaviors That Impact Vitality.”
  • The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force released a chart of its most impactful 2022 recommendations.
  • Fierce Healthcare reports, “The number of providers serving as [Medicare] accountable care organizations increased slightly this year thanks to the start of a new advanced model and a slew of reforms meant to reverse a slide in participation.”
  • Mercer Consulting digs into “must do” valued based care strategies.
  • The MIT Technology Review considers the prospect of gene editing for the masses using CRISPR 3.0
  • STAT News discusses the “hot mess” of legal issues associated with the FDA’s recent decision to make abortion drugs available at pharmacies.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

David Ermer–COVID-19, FDA, OPM, Rx coverage, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare, Uncategorized–

From the Omicron and siblings front

  • The New York Times accurately describes this Covid winter as a bump rather than a surge.
  • The Washington Post discusses a large medical study that supports the need for pregnant women to be vaccinated against Covid.

On a related note the Wall Street Journal reports

An experimental vaccine from Moderna Inc. significantly reduced the risk of a viral respiratory disease among older adults in a large clinical trial, the latest promising sign in drugmakers’ efforts to fight the deadly RSV virus. * * *

The results are the latest for an experimental RSV vaccine. Also developing shots are GSK PLC, Pfizer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. 

Meanwhile, Sanofi SA and AstraZeneca PLC have co-developed an antibody-based drug to be used for the prevention of RSV in infants. They applied for FDA approval of the drug and expect a decision in the third quarter of 2023.

From the FEHB front, Reg Jones, a retired OPM FEHB contracting officer, provides an “insiders look at FEHB” in FedWeek. His first observation is

First, when the FEHB became law some 60 years ago, I think it would have been better if there had only been a single risk pool. In other words, no Self Only, Self Plus One, and Self and Family options. Because there are these distinctions, enrollees have ever since wanted to further carve up the risk pool, creating subcategories, such as employees vs. retirees or retirees with or without Medicare as their primary insurer.

While the FEHBlog fully agrees with Mr. Jones about the value of risk pooling to FEHB, the self only, self plus one, and self and family choices are enrollment choices that affect the premiums paid but not the risk pool. OPM does break out risk pools by plan option, e.g., Standard, Basic, Elevate.

Mr. Jones is concerned about the risk pool splitting occasioned by the creation of the new Postal Service Health Benefits Program. The FEHBlog has stated his belief that OPM could have avoided this outcome by allowing FEHB plans to offer Medicare Part D EGWPs back in 2005. The FEHBlog expects that once FEHB enrollees see the lower premiums in PSHBP, Medicare D EGWPs will be added to FEHB and before the PSHBP and FEHB will become one again.

Mr. Jones also presses concern about access to medically necessary benefits which coincidentally is a topic that STAT News addressed today stemming from the Institute for Clinical and Economic Research’s publication of its “Second Annual Assessment of Barriers to Fair Access Within US Commercial Insurance Prescription Drug Coverage.” Here is a summary of the ICER Assessment’s results:

The assessment found a high level of alignment between coverage policies and fair access criteria across the formularies with the highest number of covered lives of large private payers and the VHA in the United States.  Across all relevant payer policies, ICER gave concordance ratings of 70% (59/84) for cost-sharing policies of drugs that ICER found to be reasonably priced, 96% (310/322) for clinical eligibility criteria, 98% (316/322) for step therapy criteria and 100% (322/322) for prescriber restrictions.

In the exploratory transparency analysis for select migraine and ulcerative colitis (UC) drugs aimed at discerning whether prospective plan members can find information about cost-sharing and clinical eligibility, payers were found to provide relatively good transparency into their formularies (16/18 payers met transparency criteria) but only 10/18 payers provided adequate transparency into their clinical coverage policies. In an exploratory analysis for documentation burden which reviewed the number of questions on prior authorization forms, prior authorization policies for UC and migraine drugs had a median number of questions from 25 to 36 and a range of questions from 22 to 71.

One of the most notable results of this effort is the change in coverage policies made by five payers for 11 drugs following receipt of draft results of the assessment. These changes all served to bring coverage into alignment with fair access criteria.

Note bene

ICER will host a public webinar at 12:00 p.m. ET on January 18, 2023 to discuss the key conclusions and policy implications of this assessment. Webinar presenters will include:

  • Sarah Emond, MPP, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, ICER
  • Mary B. Dwight, Senior Vice President and Chief Policy & Advocacy Officer, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation 
  • Meghan Buzby, Executive Director, Coalition for Headache and Migraine Patients (CHAMP) 

Register here for the webinar.

Also from the Rx coverage front

Fierce Healthcare reports “California has filed suit against a slew of major drugmakers and pharmacy benefit managers, alleging that they acted unlawfully to drive up the cost of insulin.”

Pharmacy Times informs us

The FDA has approved a label update for semaglutide (Rybelsus; Novo Nordisk) that allows the drug to be used in addition to diet and exercise as a first-line option to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes.

This update removes a previous limitation that stated the medication should not be used as initial therapy for treating patients with type 2 diabetes. With its initial FDA approval in 2019, semaglutide became the first and only glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog in pill form.

“The removal of the limitation of use is an important step forward for people living with type 2 diabetes and provides the option for Rybelsus to be taken earlier,” said Aaron King, MD, a family medicine and diabetes specialist, in a press release. “By taking Rybelsus first, people with type 2 diabetes, in conjunction with their care teams, are now able to utilize this medicine early in their diabetes treatment journeys.”

On a related note, the Wall Street Journal tells us

Parents and doctors are looking for new strategies to help adolescents with obesity. One controversial approach drawing the interest of some families is intermittent fasting, which limits people to eating for just a part of the day or week. 

Intermittent fasting has gained traction among adults who use it to try to manage weight and improve health. Doctors have largely avoided trying it with adolescents out of concern that introducing a fasting period to their schedules might result in nutritional gaps or trigger eating disorders when teens are rapidly growing and developing.

Now, a small number of doctors and researchers are evaluating types of intermittent fasting in adolescents, searching for solutions as rates of obesity and Type 2 diabetes rise. One pediatric endocrinologist in Los Angeles is launching a clinical trial looking at eating within a set time window in adolescents with obesity. Researchers in Australia are completing a separate trial, the results of which they expect to publish later this year.

Healthcare Dive and Fierce Healthcare offer tidbits from the medical technology front. Healthcare IT News considers whether telehealth can be used for preventive care.

From the U.S. healthcare front,

  • Beckers Hospital Review lists Healthgrades’ Top 50 Hospitals.
  • Insurance News Net fills us in on AHIP’s foci for 2023. “Access and affordability are the top two concerns of the health insurance industry as we move into a new year.”
  • You can scan Fierce Healthcare’s Fierce 15 of 2023 honorees here.

Monday Roundup

David Ermer–Congress, Employee Wellness Programs, OPM–
“Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that.”
Strength to Love, 1963.

Happy Martin Luther King Day!

Following today’s national holiday, both Houses of Congress are on State / District work breaks until next week.

Today’s blog is focused on preventive care topics.

  • HR Advisor discusses the Dos and Don’ts of Employee Wellness Programs. The FEHBlog dearly wishes that OPM would create a connection between the federal agency employee wellness and assistance programs and its FEHB plans. Doing so would help employees better navigate federal employee benefits.
  • NPR Shots offers encouraging news on a new initiative:

The 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline received over 1.7 million calls, texts and chats in its first five months. That’s nearly half a million more than the old 10-digit Suicide Prevention Lifeline fielded during the same period the year before. Launched in mid-July last year, the 988 number is modeled on the 911 system and is designed to be a memorable and quick number that connects people who are suicidal or in any other mental health crisis to a trained mental health professional. Not only are more people reaching out, more are being connected to help.  Federal data shows that the Lifeline responded to 154,585 more contacts – including calls, text messages and chats – in November 2022 than the same month the year before. The number of abandoned calls fell from 18% in November 2021 to 12% last November.

  • The American Medical Association tells us what doctors want their patients to know about preventing cervical cancer. The upshot is HPV vaccines and HPV and pap smear testing. The article discusses topics such as the timing of testing and may be worth sharing with plan members
  • Speaking of vaccinations, Precision Vaccination informs us

Women can give their babies protection against whooping cough (pertussis) before their little ones are even born, says the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently approved a second, safe vaccine that prevents whooping cough from achieving that goal.

When these (Tdap) vaccines are given during pregnancy, it increases antibodies in the mother, which are transferred to the developing fetus.

On January 10, 2023, the FDA announced the Adacel® vaccine (Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine, Adsorbed) is now approved for immunization during the third trimester of pregnancy.

As well as an active booster immunization against tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis for use in persons 10 through 64 years of age.

  • Kaiser Family News explores when pregnant women with severe nausea should seek medical care. The FEHBlog expects this is why NCQA and OPM encourage a visit to the OB-GYN in the first trimester.
  • A Govexec contributor offers a simple exercise regimen for office workers.

.

Midweek update

David Ermer–COVID-19, Federal employment benefits, Government Contracting, OPM, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Manasvita S on Unsplash

From the federal employment front —

  • Govexec explains how federal employees can calculate their 2023 pay raises.
  • The Federal Times discusses how the Secure 2.0 Act, part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2023, affects federal employee retirement programs.

Healthcare Dive identifies key trends for payers and providers in 2023.

This year’s outlook for a large chunk of the healthcare sector remains negative as inflation and pricier labor create difficult operating conditions for nonprofit providers, Moody’s Investor Service said. 

As a result, health systems and hospitals are likely to clash with insurers over desired rate increases to offset higher expenses and providers will look to increase their revenue as much as possible by bargaining for higher rates.

Becker’s Hospital CFO Report fills us in on the highlights of a Fitch Ratings webinar on healthcare

Five things to know:

  1. There will continue to be “extremely contentious” negotiations between healthcare providers and payers, Mr. Holloran said. An “above average” exiting of contracts and networks is expected.
  2. There will be far more labor strikes in 2023 with “very contentious” labor negotiations, Mr. Holloran said. Unions will be quick to move as healthcare systems seek to recruit and retain “on steroids.”
  3. Regional differences will continue to emerge. The fast-growing Southern states of Florida, Texas and Georgia will see significant capital expenditure, for example, while regions with declining populations and others will seek to tighten such expenses.
  4. There will be increased merger and acquisition activity even as the Biden administration takes a harder look at potential anti-competitive behavior. “We know everyone is talking to everyone else” about ways in which they can partner, Mr. Pascaris said. “It’s a very interesting time for M&A as increased levels of stress will likely include greater levels of M&A.”
  5. Healthcare systems cannot spend their way out of financial difficulties because the cost of labor will remain very high. The 75/75 conundrum where most systems’ revenues are fixed at 75 percent and most have a similar 75 percent fixed expense in terms of salaries and supplies is an “unstainable” model, Mr. Holloran said.

From the public health front,

  • The Secretary of Health and Human Services extended the Omicron public health emergency for another 90 days today.
  • STAT News explores “What’s standing in the way of wastewater data becoming a more mainstream public health tool.”

Moderate-to-severe hearing loss was linked with a higher prevalence of dementia, a cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries showed.

Among 2,413 older adults in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), dementia prevalence among people with moderate-to-severe hearing loss was higher than it was among people with normal hearing (prevalence ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.38), reported Nicholas Reed, AuD, of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, and colleagues.

But among people with moderate-to-severe hearing loss in the study, hearing aid use was associated with a lower prevalence of dementia compared with no hearing aid use (prevalence ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.47-1.00), they wrote in a JAMA research letter.

The findings support a recent systematic review and meta-analysis that showed treating hearing loss led to cognitive benefits. They also support the availability of over-the-counter hearing aid, which people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss now can purchase directly due to new regulations.

Given the FEHB’s demographics, FEHB plans should take a look at improving health aid coverage for 2024.

From the U.S. healthcare business front

  • Fierce Healthcare reports on today’s events at the J.P. Morgan Healthcare conference.
  • The following Fierce Healthcare report from the conference caught the FEHBlog’s eye today

Fertility benefits are becoming a major lever in the ongoing talent wars, and that’s good news for Progyny.

The eight-year-old company, which provides family building and fertility benefits for employees at large firms, launched with five clients and 110,000 covered lives. Today, Progyny has more than 370 clients with 5.4 million covered lives.

“In the past year given the current macroeconomic environment, inflationary economy an a potential looming recession, despite all that, for Progyny and its members, it’s proven to be a resilient space. People aren’t foregoing and or deferring family building, in light of all those things, and companies aren’t deferring their decisions,” Pete Anevski, Progyny’s CEO, told Fierce Healthcare on the conference sidelines.

From the telehealth front, McKinsey and Company explain how healthcare organizations can tackle the following problem:

Using national claims data,3 we estimate that more than 50 million in-person visits per year could be converted to virtual or telemedicine visits if adoption were extended equally across patient segments. In general, patient segments with limited access to in-person care (for example, those in rural counties and those with lower incomes) have relatively fewer virtual visits. While many believe virtual care can improve access for the underserved, the current imbalance in usage suggests that US healthcare stakeholders could consider designing virtual-care models that address structural barriers so that virtual care is more widely accessible.

Check it out.

Federal procurement contracts, including FEHB contracts, include a clause requiring contractors to support government efforts to combat human trafficking. During the human trafficking awareness month, the Government Accountability Office reports

Tens of millions of people are victims of human trafficking each year, according to one international organization’s estimate. Human trafficking victims are often held in slave-like conditions and forced to work in the commercial sex trade or other types of servitude. The U.S. government has also found forced labor overseas in various industries producing goods imported into the U.S., such as agricultural and seafood industries.

Several U.S. government entities work with international entities to combat human trafficking. Today, for National Human Trafficking Awareness Day (January 11), our blog post looks at our work reviewing these efforts and our snapshot highlighting areas where continued attention is needed.

Tuesday’s Tidbits

David Ermer–COVID-19, FDA, NIH, OPM, Rx coverage, SCOTUS, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Patrick Fore on Unsplash

From the FEHB front, Federal News Network provides an update on the GAO report on FEHB that was mentioned in yesterday’s post.

The Office of Personnel Management, the agency that runs the health insurance program for federal employees and retirees, does not have a clear way to identify and remove FEHB enrollees’ family members who are erroneously part of the program, according to the Government Accountability Office.

“The longer OPM delays its efforts to establish a monitoring mechanism to identify and remove ineligible members from FEHB, the more ineligible members and related improper payments in the program may continue to accrue, costing the program millions, or up to approximately one billion dollars per year, according to OPM’s own estimate,” GAO said in a Jan. 9 report.

OPM said it has received the final report and is planning to flesh out a larger response soon.

OPM’s Healthcare and Insurance Office “will be evaluating potential action items, including timelines, and will provide a comprehensive response to GAO within 180 days upon evaluation of the recommendations,” OPM spokesperson Viet Tran told Federal News Network.

From the public health front,

January is Cervical Cancer Awareness Month, and Patient Engagement HIT tells us

Nearly one in 10 women have never had a common cervical cancer screening, like a Pap test, with issues such as limited health literacy and poor access to care getting in the way, according to a Harris Poll conducted on behalf of BD (Becton, Dickinson and Company).

These trends are more common in racial minorities, with Black and Hispanic women being more likely to say they have never had a Pap test. Compared to the 6% of White women who said they’ve never had a Pap test, 12% of Hispanic women and 13% of Black women said the same. * * *

receipt of Pap tests is extremely low, the survey of 872 women ages 18 to 64. Overall, 71 percent of respondents have delayed getting a Pap test, with 15 percent saying their last OB/GYN check-up was three years ago.

Although not explicitly explored in the survey, it’s key to note that timeline aligns with the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic when access to primary and preventive care stalled. * * *

The good news is, around three-quarters of all respondents, regardless of race, said they have resolved to get back on track with their primary and preventive care, including Pap tests and HPV screenings, in the new year.

But doing so will require some leg work from the healthcare industry, which should note some patient health literacy and convenient care access snags getting in the way.

Even though nearly every respondent said they are knowledgeable about women’s health (91 percent), a whopping 81 percent admitted they don’t know how often they should get a Pap test and 51 percent said they were unaware of how often they should get an HPV test.

The survey also found consumer support for an at-home screening test. Kaiser Permanente and MD Anderson Center offer their views on at-home screening, and MD Anderson reminds us

The best protection for both men and women against HPV and related cancers[, i.e. cervical cancer,] is the HPV vaccine. All males and females ages 9-26 should get the HPV vaccine. It is most effective when given at ages 11-12. Unvaccinated men and women ages 27-45 should also talk to their doctor about the benefits of the vaccine.

MedPage Today reports

Adhering to healthy eating patterns was associated with lower risk of total and cause-specific mortality, a prospective cohort study with up to 36 years of follow-up showed.

Among 75,230 women from the Nurses’ Health Study and 44,085 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, those who scored in the highest quintile for healthy eating patterns recommended by the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) had a 14% to 20% lower risk of total mortality versus those in the lowest quintile, reported Frank Hu, MD, PhD, of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston, and colleagues in JAMA Internal Medicine opens in a new tab or window.

The pooled multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios of total mortality with four healthy eating patterns were (P<0.001 for trend for all):

  • Healthy Eating Index 2015 (HEI-2015): HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.79-0.84)
  • Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED): HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.84)
  • Healthful Plant-Based Diet Index (HPDI): HR 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.89)
  • Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI): HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.77-0.82)

This lower risk was consistent across all racial and ethnic groups.

NIH’s NIAAA Director provides tips for a successful dry January. Good luck to all those who made this resolution because

Taking a break from alcohol for an entire month provides one with an opportunity to assess their patterns of alcohol consumption and how it affects them physically and mentally. It gives a person a chance to cultivate alternatives for relaxing, socializing, and coping with stress. As a result, many people experience benefits such as improved sleep and waking without the fatigue, malaise, and upset stomach of a hangover. Some also find that without the extra calories due to alcohol they lose weight. Participants in Dry January also describe positive effects on their relationships. And an added bonus is saving money.

STAT News brings us up to date on mpox.

From the Omicron and siblings front,

  • Becker’s Hospital Review provides some geographic details on the current winter’s Covid surge.
  • The National Institutes of Health announced “The antiviral treatment Paxlovid reduced the risk of hospitalization or death from SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants in older adults by 44%. Wider use of Paxlovid may help temper a winter surge of COVID-19, as some other treatments are no longer effective.”
  • Politico reports on progress being made to end the Covid public health emergency later this year.

From the Food and Drug Administration front,

  • STAT News interviews the FDA Administrator Robert Califf on the Congressional investigative report concerning the Aduhelm fiasco.
  • The FDA announced that “In 2022,  the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research approved 37 new drugs never before approved or marketed in the U.S., known as “novel” drugs, as noted in our annual New Drug Therapy Approvals report. We also approved drugs in new settings, such as for new uses and patient populations.” 

From the Rx coverage front, Drug Channels delves into major prescription benefit manager formulary exclusions lists for 2023.

From the medical research front, the National Institutes of Health announced, “Researchers developed a blood test that could detect Alzheimer’s disease-promoting compounds in the blood long before symptoms emerged. The findings may lead to early diagnostic tests for Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front

  • Fierce Healthcare’s lead article on the ongoing JP Morgan healthcare conference concerns CVS’s Heath’s foray into primary care.
  • Healthcare Dive adds, “CVS Health is exploring an acquisition of value-based primary care chain Oak Street Health, according to a Monday Bloomberg report. The two are in ongoing talks and could reach a deal within weeks that values Oak Street at more than $10 billion including debt, according to Bloomberg, which cited sources familiar with the matter a deal.”
  • Healthcare Dive informs us that “Teladoc Health shared an early look at its financial results at JPMorgan’s healthcare conference on Monday, indicating between $633 million and $640 million in revenue for the fourth quarter, a little higher than consensus estimates from analysts. The virtual care giant projected total 2022 revenue between $2.4 billion and $2.41 billion, according to its regulatory filing. Teladoc’s direct-to-consumer mental health unit, BetterHelp, is expected to contribute roughly $1 billion of that topline.”
  • STAT News reports, “Rising labor costs have been the main financial concern for hospitals over the past year, but those costs have peaked and are now a lot lower, according to hospital system executives who presented during the J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference.”

From the post-Dobbs front, STAT News tells us about telehealth provider reactions to the Justice Department’s announcement last week permitting abortion drugs to be sold by mail and the FDA’s opportunity for pharmacies to sell those drugs.

From the Supreme Court front, STAT News relates

The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a bid by Pfizer to use a copay-assistance program to help Medicare beneficiaries pay for an expensive heart drug. The company argued the program would not violate kickback laws, a controversial issue that forced numerous drugmakers to pay large fines. Last July, an appeals court panel upheld a lower court ruling that such programs would violate federal law, but Pfizer filed a petition to the Supreme Court that contended such interpretations are “staggeringly overbroad.” Pfizer maintained there was no “corrupt intent” in offering assistance and that Medicare beneficiaries would be denied needed medicines they would otherwise not be able to afford.

It’s up to Congress to fix this problem.

Monday Roundup

David Ermer–CMS, Congress, Electronic health records, No Surprises Act, OPM, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Sven Read on Unsplash

From Capitol Hill, the Wall Street Journal reports

House Republicans passed a rules package Monday dictating the terms of the next session of Congress, the first test for House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R., Calif.) in keeping his raucous conference united.  

The rules package, a required step before moving on to legislation, is typically passed on the first day of a new Congress. But it was delayed by the GOP fight to elect a new speaker. Mr. McCarthy prevailed early Saturday morning on the 15th ballot over four days, after making a series of concessions to holdouts. 

The package passed 220 to 213, with all Democrats and one Republican, Rep. Tony Gonzales of Texas, opposing the measure. It is customary for the minority party to oppose the legislation. 

The package, which includes standard rules on decorum, also restores what is known as the motion to vacate the chair, a procedure that would allow one Republican member to ask for a vote to remove the speaker. It also outlines several Republican priorities around spending, such as banning consideration of any bill that has the net effect of increasing mandatory spending. 

The Journal adds

House Republican leaders chose Rep. Jason Smith (R., Mo.) to run the House Ways and Means Committee, giving him a prime perch to shape the party’s approach to tax, trade and health policy. 

As chairman, Mr. Smith will lead a committee with broad power over economic policy and healthcare that is poised to receive an influx of new Republican members.

From the other side of Capitol Hill, Healthcare Dive informs us

Longtime Congressman Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is expected next month to take the helm of the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, bringing the Medicare-for-All proponent center stage in one of the nation’s most broadly influential health policy forums.

The anticipated appointment comes after the current committee chair Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., announced that she was stepping down to head the Senate Committee on Appropriations. Sanders has been on the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, or HELP, since 2007, but the chance to lead the committee will give Sanders sway on some of his most prominent healthcare policy positions.

High healthcare costs — including prescription drugs like insulin —nursing education and elder care are issues Sanders anticipates focusing on, calling the national healthcare system dysfunctional, unsustainable and disgraceful in a Jan. 1 video.

From the FEHB front —

OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) posted the federal government’s fall 2022 regulatory agenda on January 4. Here are the three FEHB rulemakings:

  • OPM proposes to modify its FEHB enrollment regulations regarding the effective date of coverage. The regulatory changes would allow, at an employing agency’s discretion, FEHB Coverage to become effective upon a new employee’s start date if their election is received before that date. The regulatory changes would promote the recruitment of new Federal employees and align with the best practices of the private sector. Publication of the proposed rule is scheduled for March 2023.
  • OPM and the three other No Surprises Act regulators plan to release a proposed rule on the law’s complicated good faith estimate and advance explanation of benefits provisions in August 2023.
  • As previously noted in the FEHBlog, OPM has passed along its interim final rule to implement the Postal Service Health Benefits Program to OIRA for final regulatory review. The statutory deadline for promulgating the rule is April 6, 2023. OPM clearly will meet that deadline.
  • Here is the complete list of OPM rule-makings in process or recently completed.

The Government Accountability Office released a report titled “Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Additional Monitoring Mechanisms and Fraud Risk Assessment Needed to Better Ensure Member Eligibility.” The report summary tells us

More than 8 million federal employees and their families receive health insurance benefits under the Federal Employees Health Benefits program.

In 2021, the Office of Personnel Management began requiring some new program enrollees to verify that their family members are eligible. But OPM doesn’t have a process to identify and remove ineligible family members who are already enrolled in the program. As a result, the program may be spending almost $1 billion per year on payments for ineligible members.

We recommended that OPM take steps to remove ineligible family members and assess fraud risks associated with ineligible program members.

In the middle of the last decade, OPM added an FEHB contract provision requiring carriers to share OPM’s expenses to arrange for a family member eligibility audit, which is a common practice among employers. This struck the FEHBlog as a proven approach to identifying ineligible family members. Why not give it a go?

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released updated guidance for its Section 111 reporting program, which applies to FEHB carriers and other employer-sponsored health plans.

From the public health front —

Medpage Today tells us

In contrast to previous recommendations, pediatricians and other pediatric healthcare providers are advised to provide “immediate, intensive obesity treatment to each patient” as soon as they receive a diagnosis, according to new guidance from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

The guidance, published in Pediatrics, marks the AAP’s first clinical practice guideline outlining evidence-based evaluation and treatment for children and adolescents with overweight (defined as a body mass index [BMI] at or above the 85th percentile and below the 95th percentile) or obesity (defined as a BMI at or above the 95th percentile), though the organization previously published recommendations on prevention and treatment in 2007.

“This is one of the most important messages that differentiates our current clinical practice guidelines from the prior recommendations, and that is to say 15 years of data have taught us that ‘watchful waiting’ only leads to greater increase in child BMI, accumulation of comorbidities, and more challenges in trying to reverse some of this,” author Sarah Armstrong, MD, co-director of the Duke Center for Childhood Obesity Research in Durham, North Carolina, told MedPage Today.

In a number of key action statements, the guideline authors state that pediatricians and other providers should refer children ages 6 years and older — and potentially those ages 2 to 5 years — with overweight or obesity to intensive health behavior and lifestyle treatment.

Additionally, healthcare providers should offer weight-loss pharmacotherapy, according to medication indications, risks, and benefits, as an adjunct to health behavior and lifestyle treatment to adolescents ages 12 and older, Armstrong and colleagues noted. They should also offer referrals for evaluation for metabolic and bariatric surgery to adolescents ages 13 and older with severe obesity (BMI ≥35 or 120% of the 95th percentile for age and sex, whichever is lower).

The Wall Street Journal reports

This flu season hit earlier and harder than those of the past couple of years, doctors say. The reason is likely because of the cyclical nature of the flu and the lifting of Covid precautions such as working from home, wearing masks and having smaller social gatherings, says Robert Frenck, a pediatrician in the division of infectious diseases at Cincinnati Children’s hospital in Ohio. 

We asked doctors what to expect this year if the influenza virus causes illness in your household.

Check out the Q&A.

Politico Pulse calls attention to the fact that

Doctors are frustrated that patients are getting test results before they can explain them, POLITICO’s Ben Leonard reports.

A recently implemented federal [information blocking] rule requires HHS to ensure that patients receive test results as soon as they become available, but doctors argue that they often need to add context and support to results before patients view them — even as technology has made the results easier to share.

The disagreement, with doctors on one side and HHS and patient advocates on the other, has raised a key question: How should patients get bad news, especially in the rapidly evolving world of telehealth?

Before this rule was in effect, a member of the FEHBlog’s family received an email on a Sunday morning suggesting that she log into the patient portal. She promptly did so and was faced with confusing test results. See Seinfeld. Can’t doctors give patients a choice at the time of portal registration to get the log on email or wait to hear the results from a medical professional in non-emergency circumstances?

From the U.S. healthcare business front —

STAT News tells us

Moderna disclosed Monday that it plans to price its Covid-19 vaccine at anywhere from $110 to $130 per dose when the company pivots from a focus on government contracts to commercial distribution efforts.

The timing was not offered, but the company is holding talks with hospitals, pharmacy chains and pharmacy benefit managers. In setting such a price, Moderna will pursue the same path as Pfizer, which last year also announced plans to charge $110 to $130 a dose this year for its own Covid-19 shot. The Moderna pricing was first reported by The Wall Street Journal and confirmed by a company spokesperson.

The 41st JP Morgan healthcare conference is being held this week in San Francisco. “Fierce Healthcare will be covering the day’s biggest news as it happens. Check back here for updates, and catch Fierce Biotech’s reporting here and Fierce Pharma’s reporting here.”

Friday Stats and More

David Ermer–CDC, COVID-19, FDA, OPM, Rx coverage, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Sincerely Media on Unsplash

From the Centers for Disease Control’s weekly interpretative summary of its Covid statistics:

New Cases — “As of January 4, 2023, the current 7-day average of weekly new cases (67,243) increased 16.2% compared with the previous 7-day average (57,847). A total of 101,094,670 COVID-19 cases have been reported in the United States as of January 4, 2023. * * *

The most prevalent Omicron lineages this week are BQ.1.1, projected to be 34.4% (95% PI 26.7-
43%); XBB.1.5, projected to be 27.6% (95% PI 14.0-46.5); and BQ.1, projected to be 21.4% (95% PI 16.1-27.7%). XBB, BA.5, BN.1, BF.7, and BA.2.75 are all projected to be between 1% and 5% of circulating viruses.”

New Hospitalizations — “The current 7-day daily average for December 28, 2022–January 3, 2023, was 6,519. This is a 16.1% increase from the prior 7-day average (5,613) from December 21–27, 2022.”

New Deaths — “The current 7-day average of new deaths (390) increased 8.3% compared with the previous 7-day average (360). As of January 4, 2023, a total of 1,091,184 COVID-19 deaths have been reported in the United States.”

Vaccinations — “As of January 4, 2023, 665.1 million vaccine doses have been administered in the United States. Overall, about 229.3 million people, or 69.1% of the total U.S. population, have completed a primary series. More than 48.2 million people, or 15.4% of the U.S. population ages five years and older, have received an updated (bivalent) booster dose.”

Politico observes

Though Covid hospitalizations appear to be on the rise nationwide, experts don’t project this Omicron subvariant alone to cause a spike — forecasts from early data suggest they’ll remain fairly steady, Céline Gounder, an infectious disease specialist and senior fellow at the Kaiser Family Foundation, said. * * *

The prediction matches the data from Singapore, where a related subvariant recently became dominant but didn’t result in a spike in hospitalizations and deaths — though that country’s vaccination rate is higher than that of the U.S.

But some individuals — particularly people who are older or pregnant or have weakened immune systems — are at heightened risk from the virus, regardless of larger population trends.

“I’m a bit concerned with it just because it’s coupled with the extremely low booster rates of those over 65,” Katelyn Jetelina, epidemiologist and professor at the University of Texas Health Science Center, said. “Our most vulnerable aren’t as protected.”

The FEHBlog was encouraged to read this American Hospital Association post about a National Institutes for Health / HHS trial:

The Department of Health and Human Services will launch this month a COVID-19 Home Test to Treat telehealth pilot program in Berks County, Pa. Program organizers will work this year with public health departments to expand the program to 100,000 people in vulnerable communities. Telehealth services provider eMed will implement the program, and UMass Chan Medical School will analyze the impact on participating communities.

“At-home testing for COVID-19 is now widely available in the United States, as are antiviral treatments, and this program combines easy home access to both,” said Bruce Tromberg, director of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, which will launch the program with HHS’ Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response.

NPR adds

“What is clearer now, compared to even a year ago, is that we can really blunt the worst of [Omicron] by doing the things that we know work,” Dr. Ashish Jha, the White House coronavirus response coordinator, told NPR in an interview.

That includes getting vaccinated and boosted, especially if you’re older. Most deaths from COVID-19 are occurring in people age 65 or older.

Other precautions include avoiding crowded, poorly ventilated parties, restaurants, bars and other places; testing before gathering; and, yes, putting that mask back on in risky situations. And if you do get sick, check with your doctor about getting treatment quickly.

“It is a time not to let your guard down,” warns Dr. Tina Tan, an infectious disease specialist at Northwestern University.

The good news is the worst appears to be over from the RSV surge that has been making life miserable for many children and their parents. RSV cases have been falling steadily since the end of November, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

At the same time, the flu — which also came roaring back this fall after mostly disappearing for the previous two years — looks like it’s finally receding in most places, according to the latest data out Friday from the CDC.

From Capitol Hill, Roll Call reports that Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R CA) has been elected House of Representatives speaker. The 118th Congress, therefore, is in session.

From the Rx coverage front —

STAT News reports

The Food and Drug Administration on Friday approved a new Alzheimer’s disease treatment that moderately slows cognitive decline in people with early-stage disease.

The [intravenously administered] drug, called Leqembi [scientific name lecanemab], was developed by Eisai, the Japanese pharmaceutical company that also developed the first symptomatic treatment for Alzheimer’s 25 years ago.

Leqembi will cost $26,500 per year for a person of average weight, Eisai said. The drug has the potential to be a commercial blockbuster, but only if Medicare can be convinced to pay for it. Unless Medicare changes the way it pays for drugs like Leqembi, Eisai expects a relatively slow rollout. * * *

Eisai restricted the study of Leqembi to people with mild cognitive impairment or early stage Alzheimer’s that also have evidence of amyloid buildup in the brain, confirmed by an imaging scan. The FDA-approved label reflects the same narrowed patient population, estimated to encompass approximately 1 million people in the U.S., or just under 20% currently living with an Alzheimer’s diagnosis.

The label also mandates that patients undergo three additional brain scans during the first 14 weeks of treatment as a precautionary step to monitor for potentially serious brain swelling or bleeding episodes. * * *

Technically, the FDA granted accelerated approval to Leqembi, a faster path to the market based on preliminary evidence that the drug eliminates toxic amyloid. It’s the same controversial, regulatory shortcut that the FDA used to approve Aduhelm. But unlike Biogen, Eisai within days is expected to submit the cognition data from its positive, confirmatory study to the FDA, which will then consider the drug for full, or final, approval.

BioPharma Dive tells us, “The Food and Drug Administration is set to decide by April 13, 2023, whether to approve Alvotech’s biosimilar to AbbVie’s top-selling drug Humira, pending a facility inspection the company said Thursday it is trying to schedule early next year.” This keeps the drug on track to be on the market when the Humira patents are lifted on July 1, 2023.

According to a press release issued on January 5, 2023:

Synergie Medication Collective is a new medication contracting organization founded by a group of Blue Cross and Blue Shield affiliated companies to serve both Blues and select independent health plans. Synergie is focused on improving affordability and access to costly medical benefit drugs — ones that are injected or infused by a health care professional in a clinical setting — for nearly 100 million Americans. These high-cost treatments include multi-million-dollar gene therapies and infusible cancer drugs and represent a substantial portion of overall drug spend, with significant growth in future spend anticipated.

Synergie aims to significantly reduce medical benefit drug costs by establishing a more efficient contracting model based upon its collective reach and engagement with pharmaceutical manufacturers and other industry stakeholders. With a core philosophy that prioritizes partnership and transparency, Synergie aims to play a key role in ensuring affordable access to treatment for millions of people. * * *

Synergie Medication Collective will go to market in January of 2023.

STAT News reports

For only the second time since launching nearly two years ago, the AMR Action Fund has announced an investment in a fledgling biotech company as it tries to underwrite efforts to develop badly needed medicines for combating antibiotic resistance.

In its latest move, the fund is providing $7.5 million to BioVersys, which is developing an antibiotic to combat a type of bacteria that affects people with compromised immune systems and is increasingly responsible for infections in hospitalized patients. The drug, which is about to enter Phase 2 testing, is targeting hospital-acquired pneumonia, pneumonia associated with ventilators, and blood stream infections that originate from pneumonia.

From the health plan design front, EBRI released a study on cost-sharing trends for medical services from 2013-2020.

From the healthcare business front —

Beckers Hospital Review informs us.

VillageMD, which is majority owned by Walgreens Boots Alliance, completed its acquisition of Summit Health-CityMD Jan. 3, adding more than 2,800 providers to its ranks. 

News of the deal’s completion comes roughly two months after it was announced. On Nov. 7, VillageMD said it entered a definitive agreement to acquire Summit Health-CityMD for $8.9 billion with investments from Walgreens Boots Alliance and Evernorth, the health services portfolio of Cigna.

VillageMD, established in 2013, operates standalone Village Medical practices, full-size Village Medical practices alongside Walgreens pharmacies, and primary care in the home and virtually. 

The combination of Summit Health-CityMD and VillageMD creates one of the largest independent provider groups in the country, according to the companies’ news release. With the buy, VillageMD more than doubles its locations from more than 250 to more than 680 in 26 markets and grows its ranks by more than 2,800 providers. VillageMD declined to share the precise number of providers it now employs, but did say it employs more than 20,000 people. 

The addition also strengthens VillageMD’s footprint in five states. Summit Health and CityMD have locations in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Pennsylvania and Central Oregon. 

Fierce Healthcare discusses the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed rule banning post-employment non-compete clauses in employment agreements on healthcare.

Noncompete agreements have become so ubiquitous that a proposed rule published by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) yesterday [January 5] will affect almost all industries, experts say.

Healthcare will be no exception, Carrie Amezcua, an attorney with the law firm Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney, told Fierce Healthcare. She said healthcare industry executives should keep a close eye on the debate about the rule.

The public has 60 days to submit comments before the FTC can make it final.

“It could still change—it could still be challenged actually—because it goes too far from what the FTC has the authority to do,” said Amezcua, who usually represents employers in disputes over noncompete agreements.

Backlash to the rule has already begun. In a statement, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce called the regulation “blatantly unlawful.” * * *

Amezcua added: “Insurers are not exempt from the FTC Act. They would be subject to this rule in its final form. And right now, it is written as a complete ban on noncompete agreements, post-employment. You could still have a noncompete during your employment. But you can’t have the provision that says you can’t work for another company for two years after you leave.”

In closing, FedSmith updates us on federal retirement statistics for those interested.

Midweek Update

David Ermer–AHRQ, COVID treatment, COVID-19, HSA, Mental health care, No Surprises Act, OPM, Rx coverage, Telehealth, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Manasvita S on Unsplash

From Capitol Hill, the Wall Street Journal reports

Kevin McCarthy and his allies launched a new round of talks late Wednesday with a small but stubborn band of conservative holdouts who have blocked his bid for House speaker, as Republicans sought a path forward following a second day of votes without a winner.

Mr. McCarthy didn’t reach the majority in of three votes on Wednesday, deepening doubts about whether he would ever be able to bring enough Republicans to his side and fueling talk of alternatives.

Twenty GOP lawmakers remained opposed, along with all Democrats, blocking the California Republican from getting the necessary majority of the full House. After the sixth vote, the House adjourned and reconvened at 8 p.m. [at which point the House voted 216 to 214 to call it a day and convene at noon on Thursday.]

A flurry of meetings were taking place by early evening with Republicans shuttling between offices. In one major concession, a McCarthy-aligned super PAC, the Congressional Leadership Fund, agreed to stop picking candidates in primaries where the seat is expected to stay in Republican hands.

From the Omicron and siblings front, we have a man bites dog story.

First Nature informs us that “COVID drug Paxlovid was hailed as a game-changer. What happened?
Insufficient investment and fears about rebound and side effects are driving dowthe n use of a lifesaving antiviral.” The FEHBlog, who has had four Covid vaccinations, points his finger at the government for promoting vaccinations, which, while helpful for older and immunocompromised folks don’t prevent the illness yet, over Paxlovid, a treatment for virtually everyone.

Here’s the twist. CNBC reports

A new antiviral pill for Covid was found to be as effective as Paxlovid at curbing mild to moderate illness among people at high risk of severe disease in a Phase 3 trial in China.

The results, published Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine, suggest that the treatment had fewer side effects than Paxlovid, the go-to antiviral for high-risk patients. Around 67% of people who took the experimental pill, called VV116, reported side effects, compared to to 77% who took Paxlovid.

The new pill was also less likely than Paxlovid to cause unexpected side effects due to reactions with other medications, such as those for insomnia, seizures or high blood pressure.

“You have a medication that looks to be just as good as Paxlovid, but less cumbersome,” said Dr. Panagis Galiatsatos, an assistant professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore.

VV116 is similar to the antiviral remdesivir, which the Food and Drug Administration has approved as an IV infusion. But the team behind the new drug — pharma companies Junshi Biosciences and Vigonvita Life Science — tweaked the formula so that the body can absorb it in pill form, said Dr. Peter Gulick, an associate professor of medicine at Michigan State University. Gilead Sciences, which developed remdesivir, is testing a similar oral version of its drug.

From the Rx coverage front —

  • STAT News reports “Walgreens plans to seek certification to begin providing abortion pills under new Food and Drug Administration rules that allow the drugs to be distributed by retail pharmacies, the company told STAT on Wednesday.” P.S. FEHB plans can only cover abortion drugs when abortion is necessary to save the life of the pregnant woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape.
  • The Drug Channels blog tells us

For 2022, brand-name drugs’ net prices dropped for an unprecedented fifth consecutive year. What’s more, after adjusting for overall inflation, brand-name drug net prices plunged by almost 9%.

The factors behind declining drug prices will remain in the coming years—and become even stronger due to forthcoming changes in Medicare and Medicaid. Employers, health plans, and PBMs will determine whether patients will share in this ongoing deflation.

Read on for details and make up your own mind. And please pass the news along to the drug pricing flat earthers (#DPFE) who refuse to accept that brand-name drug prices are falling—or that prescription drug spending is a small and stable portion of overall U.S. healthcare expenditures.

  • Health Payer Intelligence tells us

Insulin costs vary based on insurance coverage type and coverage types that lead to high healthcare spending can force patients to ration their insulin supplies, a report from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) uncovered.

Healthcare spending for individuals who have diabetes—including diabetes treatment, comorbidities, preventive care, and more—amounted to approximately $446 billion total in 2019. Drug costs, including spending on insulin, were responsible for nearly a third of that amount (32 percent).

Insulin users, who tend to be in a more severe stage of the disease, contributed 46 percent of the healthcare spending total among patients with diabetes. Average healthcare spending across the population of insulin users is 4.3 times higher than for non-institutionalized Americans. * * *

Medicare beneficiaries had the highest total out-of-pocket healthcare spending for the drug when compared to privately insured and uninsured individuals’ costs. Medicaid out-of-pocket healthcare spending on insulin was low and hard to estimate.

Most insulin users have either Medicare coverage (52 percent) or private insurance (33 percent). The remainder was covered by Medicaid or reported being uninsured.

It’s worth adding that Medicare covers insulin under Medicare Part B, not Part D.

From the U.S healthcare front —

  • The American Hospital Association relates “U.S. hospitals and health systems continued to experience negative operating margins through November 2022, Kaufman Hall reported today. Median operating margins were down 44% so far this year compared with 2021, as high labor and other costs continued to outpace revenues, according to data from over 900 hospitals.”
  • BioPharma Dive reports “Moderna said Wednesday it will pay $85 million to buy OriCiro Genomics, describing the company’s tools as “best in class” for the synthesis of plasmid DNA.”

From the telehealth front

  • The Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research released a report on the use of telehealth during the Covid era.
  • The Society for Human Resource Management reminds us “Employers [sponsoring health plans including FEHB plans] will have the option to provide pre-deductible coverage of telehealth services for people with high-deductible health plans for another two years [through December 31, 2024].

From the No Surprises Act front, Health Dive digs into the recent CMS report on first-year experience with the NSA’s arbitration process.

The report from regulators provides insight on how the arbitration system is faring so far. It helps paint a picture of how frequently the portal is being used and the types of services payers and providers found themselves fighting over. It also shows what providers have initiated the most disputes.

The vast majority of disputes originated from emergency room visits.

About 81% of disputes (excluding air ambulance services) started in the emergency room.

The entities that initiated the most [arbitrations] were mainly physician staffing and revenue cycle management firms, including TeamHealth and Envision Healthcare, private equity backed practices that staff emergency rooms around the country. As a business strategy, the two work out of network, which can lead to surprise billing if the hospital remains in network, according to a prior study from Yale researchers.

The 10 groups that submitted the most disputes accounted for 75% of all the disputes involving out-of-network emergency services and non-emergency items.

From the public health front, “the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) released the results of its annual National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), which shows how people living in America reported about their experience with mental health conditions, substance use, and pursuit of treatment in 2021. The 2021 NSDUH national report includes selected estimates by race, ethnicity, and age group. It is the most comprehensive report on substance use and mental health indicators that SAMHSA has released to date.” This HHS announcement summarizes the survey’s findings.

From the OPM front, Federal News Network reports on OPM’s plans to refresh its website, which in the FEHBlog’s opinion can’t come soon enough. “Aside from overhauling its main website, OPM is also planning to make more updates to its retirement services. It’s the area of the agency that encompasses the most legacy — or outdated — technology in all of OPM, [an OPM spokesperson] said. Bravo.