Weekend Update

Congress

Weekend Update

David Ermer–ACA, Congress, U.S. Healthcare–

Congress remains in session this week on Capitol Hill for legislative and committee business. The House passed its first appropriations minibus (HR 7608) last week. The FEHBlog expects the House to pass the next minibus (HR 7617) including FEHBP appropriations this coming week. Meanwhile, both Houses continue to work on another COVID-19 relief bill.

On Friday, the federal government filed its opposition to the Whitman-Walker Clinic’s motion for a preliminary injunction to stay the mid August effective date for the Trump Administration’s revised ACA Section 1557 rule. While the FEHBlog expected the government to pull back the rule in order to adjust it for the Supreme Court’s Bostock County decision, the government took the hang out route. The plaintiffs’ reply is due Wednesday July 29 and the oral argument on the motion will be held on Monday August 3 at 2 pm in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. According to Katie Keith’s article on ACA litigation, posted last week, there are several other legal challenges pending against this rule.

The FEHBlog did virtually attend NCQA’s Digital Quality Summit last week. The FEHBlog was probably the only lawyer attending this conference, but the FEHBlog finds health care quality measurement fascinating (just like OPM). However, the FEHBlog just took a look at the speaker’s list and found out that one of the general session speakers is a sister at the bar. What do you know? The FEHBlog remains a firm believer in the FHIR API to facilitate health quality measurement. The FEAHBlog likes the lead in this FHIR website “Integrations don’t need to be complicated.”

In other news

Proponents of alternative payment models hope the pandemic will drive adoption of value-based arrangements down the line, as the financial pressures facing fee-for-service primary care practices have highlighted the shortcomings of paying for volume. There’s a dichotomy between fee-for-service practices, which have been staring at potential financial ruin since March, and those in alternative payment models, [e.g. direct primary care practices“}whose finances are in some ways insulated from the worst of the pandemic’s economic repercussions.

  • Health Payer Intelligence reports that

More than six in ten employers said that they would be partnering with their healthcare payer in the workplace transition back to the office, an Optum survey found. The survey revealed that only 16 percent of employers had achieved a full transition to the worksite. “Although almost all organizations appear committed to completing their transitions by early September, there will be a need for sustained employee well-being support well beyond the 90-day window,” the survey reminded.

  • Here’s a Forbes’s assessment of the President’s four executive orders issued on Friday in an effort to lower prescription drug prices. The international price index executive order is still not found on whitehouse.gov. What’s more, here is Avik Roy’s take on the executive orders.

Tuesday Tidbits

David Ermer–Congress, Federal employment benefits, U.S. Healthcare–

My heavens it’s raining hard here in Bethesda Maryland.

Last week the House Appropriations Committee cleared the FY 2021 Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Bill by a vote of 30-22. This is the bill that funds the OPM and the FEHBP. FedWeek calls attention to the fact that the Committee’s report on the bill makes the following FEHBP recommendation:

The Committee recognizes the importance of medical foods, as defined in the Orphan Drug Act (21 U.S.C. 360ee(b)(3)), which often serve as firstline therapies to treat a number of conditions. The Committee is concerned about the lack of coverage of medical foods in FEHBP insurance plans. The Committee encourages OPM to encourage FEHBP plans to explore options for including coverage of medical foods within their plans.

Here’s a link to a Food and Drug Administration set of frequently asked questions about medical foods.

The House Appropriations Committee announced today the Financial Services Appropriations bill is one of seven such bills to be packaged as a minibus (H.R. 7617) and submitted to the House of Representatives for a vote next week.

Last week, the FEHBlog noted a Centers for Disease Control report noting an uptick in drug overdose death last year. Today the American Medical Association released a 2020 progress report from its opioid task force. Fierce Healthcare explains that report finds “a nearly 40% decline in opioid prescriptions in the last five years, but overdose deaths have continued to increase thanks to spiraling use of illicit drugs such as synthetic fentanyl.” Moreover, “[i]n the report, the AMA pressed for changes to remove barriers, such as prior authorization, to addicts gaining access to medical treatments.”

On the Affordable Care Act front —

  • Georgetown Law Professor Katie Keith provides a lengthy and informative update on ACA related litigation if this is your cup of tea. The FEHBlog cannot remember another federal statute that has lead to so much litigation over the validity of government actions thereunder.
  • The Internal Revenue Service released Rev. Proc. 2020-36. To comply with the ACA’s employer mandate, a large employer must offer its employees at least one coverage option that has at least 60% actuarial value and has an employee contribution that does not exceed a certain percentage of salary / wages. Every year the IRS announces the new percentage and the applicable percentage is 9.83% for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2021.

Finally, FedSmith offers guidance to federal employees who are starting to consider civil service retirement. Of note, “you have to be enrolled in FEHB and FEGLI for at least five years before retiring to be eligible to continue these programs after you retire. Having access to FEHB in retirement can save you thousands and thousands of dollars and should not be taken lightly.” How true that is.

Monday Roundup

David Ermer–Congress, COVID-19, COVID-19 vaccine, U.S. Healthcare–

In federal personnel news —

  • Politico reports that earlier today the Senate confirmed acting Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought to be permanent OMB Director.
  • Federal News Radio reports that the President intends to nominate John Gibbs to be permanent Director of the Office of Personnel Management. Mr. Gibbs “currently serves as the acting assistant secretary for community planning and development at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

It’s worth noting that the Presidential inauguration will occur six months from today.

On the COVID-19 front —

  • The Wall Street Journal reports that “The prospects of successfully developing a coronavirus vaccine as soon as this year were buoyed Monday when three of the world’s leading candidates reported positive early trial data. Vaccines being developed by University of Oxford researchers and AstraZeneca PLC; PfizerInc. and German partner BioNTech BNTX 3.46% SE; and China’s CanSino Biologics all reported fresh updates showing their shots generated immune responses and were safe to use.
  • Fierce Biotech reports that a double blind human patient study of U.K. manufacturer Synairgen’s inhaled COVID-19 treatment against a placebo produced encouraging results. “The [preliminary] data showed those who were given SNG001 [a nebulizer interferon beta protein] had a 79% lower risk of developing severe disease compared to placebo * * * with patients who got that drug also more than twice as likely to recover from COVID-19 than those on a dummy med.” Synairgen’s press release advises that “‘Further analysis will be conducted over the coming weeks and reported in due course.”

Fingers remain crossed for the vaccines and the new treatment.

Health IT Analytics discusses how “geographic data has helped leaders better understand where to allocate population health resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Given the mantra that all healthcare is local, it only makes sense that geographic data should be helpful for this purpose. For example,

To better understand where to direct resources, researchers at NYU Grossman School of Medicine recently developed a city-oriented COVID Local Risk Index. The tool calculates COVID-19 risk down to the hyperlocal, neighborhood level by relying on key health, economic, and social data at the census tract level. The index also allows for comparison of COVID-19 risk across other cities and between neighborhoods.

Well done.

Weekend update

David Ermer–Congress, COVID-19, U.S. Healthcare–

The House and the Senate will be in session on Capitol Hill for the next two weeks. The House will begin a district work break at the end of July while the Senate will continue in session until August 5. Congress will be out of session for the remainder of August for the political conventions. It will be interesting to see whether another COVID-19 relief bill emerges over the next three week legislative period.

Speaking of COVID-19, Govexec.com estimates that 19,000 federal employees and 20,000 members of the U.S. military have tested positive for COVID-19. That’s roughly 1% of the total number of federal employees and military members and 1% of the total number of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. That’s encouraging given the fact that many federal employees, e.g., the Postal Service, law enforcement, as well as military members have not been hunkered down during the emergency. Thanks to all of you for your service.

The FEHBlog subscribes to the Washington Post’s Optimist email and today’s lead article caught his attention — “Need some good news about covid-19? Here are six reasons for optimism.” The writer who directs the Health Buildings Program at Harvard’s public health schools discusses six trends that the FEHBlog has been following to one extent of another. It’s helpful to read them summarized here.

The FEHBlog looks forward to virtually attending the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Digital Quality Summit this coming Wednesday and Thursday. The FEHBlog will share a few tidbits with his readership.

In last Friday’s post, the FEHBlog mentioned the key roles that hospitals and other healthcare providers including “pharma” and the prescription benefit managers plus the government play in responding to the COVID-19 emergency. It occurred to the FEHBlog over the weekend that his readers may wonder where health plans fit into this mix.

Health plans need to keep on keeping on, as they have done, by paying claims and helping members navigate the healthcare system, among other things. That’s an important responsibility. In my experience, FEHB plans have not missed a beat during the emergency, and the FEHBlog is proud to serve many of them.

Monday roundup

David Ermer–Congress, COVID-19, HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules, OPM, Rx coverage–

The Wall Street Journal seeks to answer a question that the FEHBlog has been pondering — “Scientists Hoped Summer Temperatures Would Tamp Down Covid-19 Cases. What Happened?” “There are three likely reasons, public-health and infectious-disease experts said. They have to do with the current [relatively low] levels of immunity in the population, how the virus is transmitted [by respiratory droplets] and how people behave [/fail to follow public health guidance].” Oh well.

The Hill reports that “The two main health insurance lobbying groups, America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, wrote a letter to congressional leaders on Friday making a [wide] range of requests for the next coronavirus response package, expected later this month.” Check it out.

HHS’s Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration today finalized a revised 42 CFR Part 2 rule intended to better facilitate coordination of patient care. Part 2, which dates back to 1975, applies to substance use disorder patient records held by certain federally assisted health care providers. Here is a link to the FAQs on the final rule. The next time that SAMHSA revises this rule it will do so to align the rule with the generally applicable HIPAA Privacy Rule in accordance with the CARES Act. The statutory deadline for this action is March 27, 2021.

Fedsmith offers an article discussing whether federal annuitants with FEHB coverage also should elect to purchase Medicare Part prescription drug coverage. Here is OPM’s guidance:

Part D: There is a monthly premium for Part D coverage. Most Federal employees do not need to enroll in the Medicare drug program, since all Federal Employees Health Benefits Program plans will have prescription drug benefits that are at least equal to the standard Medicare prescription drug coverage. Still, you may want to be aware of the benefits Medicare is offering, so you can help others make informed decisions. If you have limited savings and a low income, you may be eligible for Medicare’s Low-Income Benefits. For people with limited income and resources, extra help in paying for a Medicare prescription drug plan is available. Information regarding this program is available through the Social Security Administration (SSA). For more information about this extra help, visit SSA online at www.ssa.gov, or call them at 1-800-772-1213 (TTY 1-800-325-0778).

Weekend update

David Ermer–Congress–

The House of Representatives will continue to engage in Committee business this week, while the Senate is on a State work break. Both bodies begin to undertake legislative business including floor votes on July 17.

Federal News Network reports that “Days after House appropriators essentially endorsed the president’s planned 1% federal pay raise for civilian employees next year, a bipartisan group of House members are pushing for a bigger boost. [A bipartisan group of] Ten House lawmakers say civilian federal employees should earn pay parity with the military next year. Military members are on track to receive a 3% raise in 2021.” The article further explains that “Congress has stepped in twice in the last two years to override the president’s federal pay recommendations, with lawmakers securing a 3.1% boost for civilian employees for 2020 and a 1.9% bump in 2019.”

Don’t forget that due to the COVID-19 emergency, Wednesday July 15 is federal and generally state income tax filing and payment day for tax year 2019. It’s this year’s April 15.

Midweek Update

David Ermer–Congress, COVID-19, Federal employment benefits, Medicare, OPM, Rx coverage, U.S. Healthcare–

A House of Representatives appropriations subcommittee approved by voice vote today the bill funding financial services and general government for the 2021 fiscal year. That bill encompasses OPM and the FEHBP. Yesterday’s FEHBlog post discussed the relevant substance of the bill considered today. The bill now moves onto full appropriations committee consideration.

Fierce Healthcare reports that “Healthcare leaders and health IT groups are calling on Congress to repeal a section of the law that prevents the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from working with the private sector to develop a nationwide patient identification strategy.” The advocates are pointing to the COVID-19 emergency as another reason for taking this sensible action. ” Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, contact tracing efforts are hampered without accurate demographic information that correctly identifies the right patient.”

Also, on the COVID-19 front, the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) announced today that “The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the NIH, has established a new clinical trials network that aims to enroll thousands of volunteers in large-scale clinical trials testing a variety of investigational vaccines and monoclonal antibodies intended to protect people from COVID-19.”

The Wall Street Journal reports that

Drugmaker Emergent Biosolutions Inc. plans to work with Mount Sinai Health System in New York City to test whether a drug derived from the blood plasma of recovered Covid-19 patients can prevent infections in doctors, nurses and military forces. The proposed study, which the partners announced Wednesday, would add to efforts evaluating the coronavirus-fighting potential of experimental drugs made from plasma donated by recovered patients. If the drug proves to work safely, it could help protect health-care workers and other people working in essential jobs who are at high risk of infection until a vaccine is ready and perhaps even after.

On the general U.S. healthcare front Healthcare Dive reports that

Walgreens on Wednesday announced plans to open up to 700 primary care clinics across the country over the next five years in partnership with medical services provider VillageMD, and “hundreds more” after that. As part of the agreement, Walgreens will invest $1 billion in equity and convertible debt in Chicago-based VillageMD over the next three years, including a $250 million equity investment Wednesday. VillageMD will use 80% of the funds to pay for opening the clinics, called Village Medical at Walgreens, and integrate digitally with Walgreens.

and that

Walmart will now sell health insurance policies directly to its customers, a spokesperson told Healthcare Dive, confirming speculation sparked by job postings from the retailer for Medicare sales managers and insurance agents, first reported by the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. Analysts with SVB Leerlink said the move underscores the attractiveness of this market and the likelihood of increased competition over time, while Walmart’s reach across U.S. consumers — including seniors — has the potential to drive up volume for Medicare plans.

What’s more, Health Payer Intelligence discusses why some health plans seek out seriously ill members to wit “By developing a greater understanding of seriously ill populations, payers and policymakers can more accurately target their population health management strategies.”

And a Forbes columnist criticizes government telehealth parity mandates. The column provides an interesting perspective on the telehealth craze. As the FEHBlog’s late grandmother frequently advised “moderation in all things.”

Last but not least, FedWeek explores the OPM Federal Employees Benefits Survey to understand why some federal employees don’t enroll in our beloved FEHBP.

the survey found that of those not enrolled [roughly 19% of the surveyed population], 90 percent are obtaining health care through some other program, most commonly through a spouse’s employment and most commonly through the military TRICARE program. “Less than one percent of respondents said that they are not enrolled in FEHB and do not have health insurance because they do not think there is a need,” OPM said.

Tuesday Tidbits

David Ermer–Congress, Medicare, OPM, Rx coverage, Telehealth–

Federal News Network reports that

House appropriators are silent on federal [employee] pay for now, increasing the likelihood that a planned 1% raise for civilian employees next year will advance as the president intended.

A draft budget bill for 2021, which the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government released Tuesday afternoon, makes no mention of a federal pay raise for General Schedule employees next year.

In their silence, House appropriators are essentially deferring to the proposal President Donald Trump offered earlier this year. In his budget request for 2021, the president recommended a 1% across-the-board federal pay raise for civilian employees next year, with no further locality pay adjustments. Military members are on track to receive a 3% pay raise next year.

The House bill also includes the three standard FEHBP appropriations clauses — a provision prohibiting the application of full Cost Accounting Standards coverage to FEHB plans (Sec. 611), a provision restricting abortion coverage (Sec. 611), and a provision mandating contraception coverage (Sec. 613).

Fortune Magazine discusses CMS Administrator Seema Verma’s comments on data accessibility and telemedicine at a Fortune conference today. Fierce Healthcare adds that “

CMS is eyeing ways to make expanding access to telehealth permanent, though the final word in overhauls to Medicare lies with Congress, Verma said. “It’s not a panacea; it’s not going to solve every problem,” she said. “Not everything is going to be able to be addressed by telehealth. But it’s a very powerful tool for medicine.”

Healthcare Dive provides us with background on the healthcare providers who received Payroll Protection Program loans from the federal government. In the FEHBlog’s book, the PPP is one of the best relief measures that Congress has dreamed up.

On the prescription benefit management front, Fierce Healthcare informs us that

Anthem’s pharmacy benefit manager IngenioRx will acquire ZipDrug, a data-driven pharmacy management company.

The acquisition expands IngenioRx’s offerings to include a platform that directs consumers to pharmacies with high-performing pharmacies and that offers home prescription delivery, the insurer announced (PDF) Monday.

IngenioRx will offer ZipDrug’s services both integrated into its broader PBM platform and as a standalone service, according to the announcement.

and that

Startup pharmacy benefit manager Capital Rx is teaming up with Walmart to bring greater transparency to specialty and mail-order prescriptions.

Capital Rx provides PBM services to employers and health plans through its “clearinghouse” model, in which they provide unit costs for drugs upfront to clients. The model is also designed to prevent “spread pricing,” in which a PBM charges a payer significantly more than a pharmacy’s price for a drug to reap profits.

Monday Roundup

David Ermer–CDC, Congress, COVID-19, Medicare, OPM–

The FEHBlog has explained that OPM scores FEHB plans principally on certain HEDIS and CAHPS scores measured against where other health plans (generally not just FEHB plans) score. NCQA which manages HEDIS and CAHPS for health plan scoring purposes, released last Wednesday two years of specifications for HEDIS measures (the 2020 and 2021 measurement year “specs.”).

The happy result of this NCQA action is that beginning next year FEHB and other health plans subject to HEDIS will know the rules of the road five months before the measurement year begins rather than six months into the measurement year which has the the case right through this 2020 measurement year. Bravo NCQA.

Meanwhile Health Payer Intelligence reports on an America’s Health Insurance Plans commissioned study finding that “Nearly three-quarters of NCQA HEDIS quality measures will experience a negative impact from the coronavirus pandemic.” Marvelous. The article also suggests some ways that health plans can boost their HEDIS scores in these hard times.

Speaking of these hard times, three major healthcare provider associations (the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Associations, and the American Nurses Association) issued a letter today encouraging the public “to take the simple steps we know will help stop the spread of the virus: wearing a face mask, maintaining physical distancing, and washing hands.” That’s good advice for health plans to spread around too.

RevCycle Intelligence informs that the American Hospital Association and its fellow hospital groups are urging the Department of Health and Human Services to delay the January 1, 2021, effective date for the Administration’s hospital pricing transparency rule at least until the case challenging the rule works it way through the court system. At this point a federal district court has upheld the rule and the American Hospital Association has appealed that decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. The article adds that

No response from CMS was available as of July 2. However, lawmakers are looking to make the price transparency rule law. Introduced by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on June 30th, the PRICE Transparency Act seeks to codify the hospital price transparency rule and a similar rule requiring payers to publicly share cost-sharing and in- and out-of-network provider rates.

In other 2021 news, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services issued a proposed rule for pricing Medicare end stage renal disease coverage next year. “CMS is proposing that certain new and innovative equipment and supplies used for dialysis treatment of patients with ESRD in the home would qualify for an additional Medicare payment. These proposed changes would encourage the development of certain new and innovative home dialysis machines that would give beneficiaries more dialysis treatment options in the home that can improve their quality of life.”

Weekend update

David Ermer–Congress, COVID-19 vaccine, SCOTUS–

The House of Representatives is engaged in Committee work this week. The Senate is on a State work period for the next two weeks. Meanwhile, according to Fierce Healthcare,

a collection of unions, business groups and policy institutes wrote to congressional leaders Wednesday asking for a provision on surprise medical bills to be included in the next coronavirus stimulus package. “We urge you to end surprise medical billing for all patients through the implementation of fair, market-based payments for out-of-network charges,” the letter said. The American Benefits Council, the AFL-CIO, the Business Group on Health and the American Health Policy Institute were among the groups that signed on to the letter.

That resolution is also the FEHBlog’s preference while provider groups often call for arbitration of some sort.

The U.S. Supreme Court has eight more cases to decide before its summer break. All of these cases were argued virtually in May 2020, and include one PPACA case involving the scope of the contraception mandate. Tomorrow is another decision day. This will be the first time in 24 years that the Supreme Court has released decisions in July. The most famous Supreme Court decision issued in July in the FEHBlog’s memory was the U.S. v. Nixon case decided July 24, 1974, which lead to the President’s resignation early the following month.

The Wall Street Journal brings us up to date on the state of COVID-19 vaccine development. Several candidates are headed into large scale final/phase 3 testing this month.

The U.S. federal government is planning to fund three 30,000-person trials starting this summer: Moderna Inc.’s vaccine starting this month, followed in August by a vaccine co-developed by University of Oxford and AstraZeneca PLC, and in September, a vaccine developed by Johnson & Johnson. Oxford’s vaccine recently began late-stage testing outside the U.S.

The scale is so large it means trials are effectively competing with each other for recruits. “One volunteer cannot be in two different studies. It’s a zero-sum game in that regard,” said Dr. Joseph Kim, chief executive of Inovio Pharmaceuticals Inc., which last week announced positive results in a small study and is preparing for a larger study. PRA Health Sciences Inc., which helps recruit trial patients, is mining busy Covid-19 testing locations, including public-health departments, testing labs and pharmacies, to find healthy volunteers, said Kent Thoelke, PRA’s chief scientific officer.

Fingers remain crossed.

On Friday, the FEHBlog suggested that readers check out last Monday’s Econtalk interview about healthcare reform. The discussion of Iora Health. Iora Health is a multi-state group practice which holds a Medicare Advantage plan contract and is looking to expand to employer groups. Their model is centered on the use of health coaches.