The excitement about Thursday’s House FEHBP oversight hearing is becoming palpable The Federal Workforce subcommittee has posted an advisory and a witness list, and the Hill’s Healthwatch also weighed in with a report headlined “House hearing will scrutinize FEHBP.”  According to the advisory, 

The hearing will give Members an opportunity to learn more about the FEHPBP’s current benefits, categories of enrollment and premium fees, as well as proposed legislative changes designed to improve the program. The Obama Administration is expected to propose several changes to the program in the president’s FY2014 budget [to be released tomorrow], including granting OPM the authority to offer additional health plan types and contract with prescription drug providers directly.

Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-Texas) chairs the subcommittee. The hearing begins at 10 am on Thursday in the Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s hearing room,  2154 Rayburn House Office Building.


In the final essential health benefits rule, HHS applied to all group health plans an annual dollar cap on out-of-pocket expenses for in-network care beginning in 2014.  The ACA regulators allowed a one year phase in period for separately administered benefits such as prescription drugs and dental benefits in FAQ XII, Q&A 2. The doctors and consumers groups now are screaming foul according to Kaiser Health News.  It’s no wonder that premiums are expected to skyrocket next year. 


OPM released the Fiscal Year 2012 Common Characteristics of the Government report today. This annual report “serves as an overview of the size and characteristics of the Federal civilian workforce. For example the average ave of full time permanent employees is 47.1 years, up .2 from the average age in 2008 and 2011 and the gender mix is 57.3% male and 42.7% female.  


When the merger of Medco Health and Express Scripts was announced, the FEHBlog (who since then generally has stopped making predictions) expected the federal government to block this merger of two of the three largest prescription benefit managers. In the end, the merger went through, and a recent Forbes article suggests why (extensive legwork). 

Congress is in session this week, and the Hill’s Floor Watch provides a look ahead. On the agenda is week is a House Federal Workforce subcommittee hearing titled “The Federal Employees Health Benefit Program: Is It a Good Value for Federal Employees?” Hopefully the subcommittee staff recognizes that this is question that answers itself. Of course it does. The Program has kept premium increases below the national average for the past two years, notwithstanding an older population (average age of an FEHBP enrollee is around 60).  The FEHBlog will be in attendance.

The Wall Street Journal’s weekend edition lead with a story headlined provocatively  “When Your Boss Makes You Pay for Being Fat.”

Until recently, Michelin awarded workers automatic $600 credits toward deductibles, along with extra money for completing health-assessment surveys or participating in a nonbinding “action plan” for wellness. It adopted its stricter policy after its health costs spiked in 2012.

Now, the company will reward only those workers who meet healthy standards for blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides and waist size—under 35 inches for women and 40 inches for men. Employees who hit baseline requirements in three or more categories will receive up to $1,000 to reduce their annual deductibles. Those who don’t qualify must sign up for a health-coaching program in order to earn a smaller credit.

The Affordable Care Act promotes this trend by increasing the maximum penalty from 20% to 30% of premiums. According to HHS’s proposed rule, the penalty can reach as high as 50% for tobacco cessation efforts. Federal employees won’t be subject to these penalties, however, unless Congress changes the government contribution formula to incorporate this ACA provision. The article concludes

For now, employers are trying to balance the carrot and the stick. Plenty of companies will be watching to see if inflicting a little financial pain leads to change in the long run. “What are the right pain points?” asks Paul Keckley, executive director of Deloitte LLP’s health-care research arm, the Center for Health Solutions. “Ultimately, you have to make behavior change automatic. We’ve got to make this like brushing your teeth.” 

It will be interesting to learn whether or not this issue crops up at the hearing on Thursday.

Well the FEHBlog will be off to visit New York City for the weekend shortly and there’s not much to report.

The New York Times makes some prognostications about the President’s delayed budget proposal, suggesting that unlike prior years it may be not dead on arrival on Capitol Hill this year.

Mr. Obama’s proposed spending reductions include about $400 billion from health programs and $200 billion from other areas, including farm subsidies, federal employee retirement programs, the Postal Service and the unemployment compensation system.
In Medicare, the savings would mostly come from payments to health care providers, including hospitals and pharmaceutical companies, but Mr. Obama also proposes that higher-income beneficiaries pay more for coverage. 

The options include tighter regulation of premiums, forcing insurers to cut costs or operate at a loss; financial assistance to consumers, in addition to subsidies that will be provided by the federal government; and programs to ensure that the costs of the sickest patients are shared by all insurers.

That’s a head scratcher.

Also Kaiser Health News is reporting that Walgreens is expanding its clinical offerings to chronically ill people. That should please the AMA.

The International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans has named today National Employee Benefits Day. Here are the ten top ways to celebrate. My favorite is #10.

Health insurers are celebrating today because HHS backed off on its plan to use the sustainable rate of growth formula to cut Medicare Advantage rates for 2014. The Washington Post explains how the insurers won this uphill battle.

Govexec.com reports that “Office of Personnel Management Director John Berry’s [four year long] term expires in less than two weeks, and he is expected to announce his departure from OPM soon.”  Director Berry is expected to be named U.S. Ambassador to Australia.

The FEHBlog finds it interesting to track second and third bounces of the ball. For that reason, he read with interest this Insurance Broadcasting report about how casualty insurance actuaries are evaluating how the roll out of the Affordable Care Act will impact medical malpractice and workers compensation premiums.

The AMA News takes a closer look at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s U.S. county by county health rankings.

The comparison underscores a key finding in the 2013 survey: Gaps
between the healthiest and unhealthiest counties in individual states
are large and continue to grow. The survey highlighted the fact that
residents in the healthiest counties are 1.4 times more likely to have
access to a primary care physician than those in the least healthy
counties. Unhealthy areas also had higher rates when it came to a host
of other negative indicators of overall health, including child poverty,
teen pregnancy and premature death.

All health care remains local. The article notes that the rankings now in their fourth year are spurring useful competition. The FEHBA does provide expanded coverage in areas that OPM deems medically underserved (5 U.S.C. § 8902(m)(2)).

Happy Easter and Passover! Congress continues to be on recess this coming week. The President will release his FY 2014 budget on April 10, over two months late, and an FEHBP oversight hearing will occur on Capitol Hill the next day.

The FEHBlog was intrigued to read in the Wall Street Journal that retail drugstores are pressing state legislatures, most notably in Oregon, to require prescription drug managers “to turn over arcane pricing data that would help drugstores negotiate bigger reimbursements.” Of course, the laws would help the large chains too and push to old cost curve up. PCMA, the PBM trade association has more details here.

While on that topic, the Hill’s Healthwatch reports on a Consumer Reports price comparison of generic drug prices. For example, it found that reported that a month’s supply of generic Lipitor, the anti-cholesterol drug, cost $17 at Costco and $150 at CVS.  Of course, generic lipitor could have been a loss leader at CostCo that month. Most consumers of course don’t pay retail for generic drugs because they have health plan or Medicare Part D coverage.  That brings us back to the Oregon bill. Have a good holiday.

The Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research has posted on its website a toolkit to help hospitals avoid unnecessary readmissions — a major federal government initiative that OPM has adopted. Although the toolkit is designed for hospital discharge unit staff members, the FEHBlog expects that health plan case managers will find it useful as well.

Also of interest to case managers may be the new Medicare Chronic Condition Dashboard announced today by CMS. “The dashboard offers researchers, physicians, public health
professionals, and policymakers an easy-to-use tool to get current data
on where multiple chronic conditions occur, which services they require,
and how much Medicare spends helping beneficiaries with multiple
chronic conditions.” Here is a link to the dashboard.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology announced that it is gathering de-identified data from electronic health records to build a “knowledge-generating computer network [known as CancerLinQ] that will collect and analyze cancer care data from millions of patient visits, together with expert guidelines and other evidence, to generate real-time, personalized guidance and quality feedback for physicians.”  The Wall Street Journal explains

In the ASCO project, called CancerLinQ, almost all patients would, in effect, become part of a clinical study. The system would collect data that doctors routinely record in a patient’s files, such as age, gender, medications and other illnesses, along with the patient’s diagnosis, treatment and, eventually, date of death. Once the outcome of a sufficient number of patients is pooled, doctors could tap the database for help in developing treatments for other patients.
For instance, consider a 77-year-old man with stage 3 colon cancer, heart failure and diabetes, said W. Charles Penley, a cancer doctor at Tennessee Oncology in Nashville. “That patient wouldn’t have been included in a clinical trial, but those are the folks we take care of in the real world all the time,” he said.
Using the database, Dr. Penley could see how the top three chemotherapy regimens for similar patients performed, and how age, heart failure and diabetes might have affected the treatment.
“If you can query a database in real time for a patient in your office, this is a potential game changer,” Dr. Penley said.
The database also would “give us more evidence for the treatments we actually use,” said Sandra Swain, ASCO president and a breast-cancer specialist at Medstar Washington Hospital Center in Washington, D.C.

That is cool stuff — an innovation that could help pull the cost curve down (gasp).

The Standard and Poor’s Healthcare Cost Indices for January 2013 recently were released:

In January 2013 eight of the nine headline healthcare indices we publish showed acceleration in their annual growth rates,” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at S&P Dow Jones Indices. While eight of the nine key components increased, the increases were small to moderate.
“The Composite Index posted an annual rate of +3.83%, the Commercial Index +5.41% and the Medicare Index +1.41%. In January, four of the nine healthcare indices ticked up from their historic lows posted in December. They were the Composite Index, the Medicare Index, the Professional Services Medicare Index and the Hospital Index. The Commercial Index at +5.41% went 0.03 percentage points above its recent low posted in December. The only index that decelerated in January was the Hospital Commercial; it posted a historic low of +2.86%.

The Catalyst for Payment Reform issued its first National Scorecard on Payment Reform. The Scorecard shows that notwithstanding the best efforts of insurers and health plans “only about 11 percent of  the health care dollars we pay to doctors and hospitals today are value-oriented — tied to how well they  deliver care or create incentives for both improving quality and reducing waste. Almost 90 percent of  payments reported remain in traditional fee-for-service, paying providers for every test and procedure  they perform regardless of necessity or outcome, or in bundled, capitated, or partially-capitated  payments without quality incentives.”    This employer coalition has created a payment reform toolkit here, but in the FEHBlog’s view the medical profession needs to start healing itself.

Finally, the Society of Actuaries “predicts that expected changes in member composition of the individual
health care market could drive up underlying claims costs by an average
of 32 percent nationally by 2017. In addition, the study predicts high
variability among states, with as many as 43 states experiencing a
double-digit percentage claims cost increase and some states
experiencing a double-digit cost decrease.”  The FEHBP and other private sector health plans are obligated to help stabilize premiums for these individual insureds in the exchanges through $63 per head (in 2014). This study suggests that Congress may wind up extending this subsidization which is now scheduled to end in 2017. This will be a wild ride.

The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s
Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce, USPS and the Census will be holding an
FEHBP oversight hearing on April 11 at 10 am in Room 2154 of the Rayburn
Building.  The hearing will focus on the administration of and potential
improvements to the program, including the types of plans and benefits
available to enrollees, categories of enrollment, and premiums.  The
hearing also will consider the relationship among Medicare, the Affordable Care
Act, and the FEHBP. The FEHBlog will be there with bells on. 


The President today signed the continuing resolution funding the federal government through the end of the current federal fiscal year on September 30, 2013, with the federal employee pay freeze and the sequester still in place according to govexec.com  On a related note, the AMA News compares the healthcare provisions in the budget resolutions that the House and Senate passed before going on recess this week. 


Also Modern Healthcare reminds us that today is the effective date for the 563 page long omnibus HITECH Act rule modifying the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules.  Govinfo Security reports on the importance of encrypting protected health information.  The compliance date for this rule is six months from now. There is a lot to do, particularly in terms of educating business associate subcontractors about the new legal requirements on them. 

Congress is in recess this week after completing work on the continuing resolution extension and their budget resolutions.

Of course, yesterday was the Affordable Care Act’s third birthday. The Hill reviews implementation challenges facing federal and state governments.

On January 1, 2014, Senators, members of Congress, and their personal staffs will have to exit the FEHBP. Reg Jones in the Federal Times answers a staffer’s question about the wisdom of retiring on December 31, 2013, to preserve his FEHBP coverage. (Smart move.) It will be interesting to see the details of this transition develop.

Tammy Flanagan in govexec.com explains why it would not be prudent for a federal employee to cancel his FEHBP coverage as a way to cut personal expenses in the face of a furlough. The FEHBlog agrees. Govexec.com also maintains an agency by agency furlough watch here.

AHIP has issued a report on rising hospital service prices and a retort to Commonwealth Fund report poo-pooing health plan efforts to improve patient care.  

Congressman Stephen Lynch (D Mass) who chaired the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee when Rep. Nancy Pelosi was Speaker has reintroduced his “FEHBP Prescription Drug Integrity, Transparency, and Cost Savings Act” (HR 1367). Back in 2010 OPM responded to the bill by imposing very strict transparency requirements on contracts between nationwide fee for service plan carriers and prescription benefit managers. OPM’s rules require that the PBMs charge actual costs for prescriptions drugs both at retail and at mail / home delivery and credit the plans for all rebates and related revenues. These rules have been implemented.

Govexec.com reports that “Pharmacy claims account for about 30 percent of FEHBP premiums, according to OPM. This equates to more than $10 billion annually, Lynch said.” The prescription drug spend in the FEHBP like all employer sponsored programs is a large dollar amount. However, the prescription drug spend percentage for the FEHBP is skewed by the fact that the FEHBP has a very large cadre of annuitants whose hospital bills are paid by Medicare Part A. FEHBP pays their prescription drug bills. That’s not a bad deal because hospital costs still outweigh prescription drug costs. If you were to add the hospital bills that Medicare pays to the total FEHBBP benefit spend, the drug spend percentage would drop significantly. The FEHBP expects that the percentage would be in line with other employer sponsored plans, considering the fact that the average age of a FEHBP enrollee is around 60. The sky is not falling.

Congressman Lynch’s press release comments that “Regrettably, the FEHBP is paying between 15% and 45% more for its prescription drugs than other federal programs, including those at the Veterans Administration, the Department of Defense, Medicare, Medicaid, and the Public Health Service’s 340B Program.” The FEHBlog cannot vouch for any percentages but he knows that these public health programs like the VA and Medicaid, clamp down hard on utilization by using closed formularies and other common techniques. Cutting back on choice is how drugs costs are controlled, but the unions, NAGE and AFGE, who wildly support Congressman Lynch’s bill, would have a bird if FEHB plans adopted the same techniques. Always be careful what you wish for.