Midweek update

SCOTUS

Midweek update

David Ermer–ACA, Congress, Medicare, SCOTUS–

OPM and AHIP which co-sponsor the annual FEHBP Carrier Conference have posted the Conference agenda. The FEHBlog welcomes the half day of break out sessions has been added to the agenda. The conference which is held in Arlington Virginia will run from early Wednesday afternoon April 1 through late Friday morning April 3.

Earlier today, the House of Representatives, as expected, passed a bill to repeal the 2006 law obligating the Postal Service to pre-fund healthcare coverage for their annuitants. Businesses generally have to account for this type of cost as a liability, but don’t have to put the money aside as the Postal Service must (although the Postal Service has not been able to fund the cost since 2012).

The FEHBlog expects the Senate to adopt this bill which reflects reality. The FEHBlog wonders whether this action will deflate the long running effort to create a lower cost Postal Service program within the FEHBP. The next edition of a general postal reform bill will be telling on this point.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services today proposed changes to the Medicare Advantage and Part D prescription drug programs. Health Payer Intelligence explains that the proposals

will increase plans’ revenues by 0.93 percent. The proposed rule would extend Medicare Advantage eligibility to those diagnosed with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), lower cost-sharing on prescription drugs, and enforce greater transparency and comparability of out-of-pocket healthcare spending for different drugs. CMS also introduced measures to promote using generics and biosimilar

CMS explains that the agency “will accept comments on all proposals in the Advance Notice through Friday, March 6, 2020, before publishing the final Rate Announcement by April 6, 2020.”

Speaking of Medicare, Healthcare Dive discusses an intriguing Humana initiative to develop primary care centers for their Medicare Advantage members. “The new venture is likely to double the number of centers [Humana subsidiary} Partners in Primary Care operates. It currently runs 47 locations throughout Kansas, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Florida.”

The FEHBlog has been tracking the course of the Texas v. U.S. case through the U.S. Supreme Court (Consolidated Nos. 19-840, 19-841). A group of States and the House of Representatives have petitioned the Supreme Court to review a December 2019 Fifth Circuit opinion holding the ACA’s individual mandate unconstitutional and directing the lower court to reconsider the extent to which the remainder of this massive law is severable from the unconstitutional part.

The parties’ and amici (friends of the Court) briefing on the petition for review will be competed on February 12, 2020. The Court’s docket sheet revealed today that the briefs will be distributed to the Court for the February 21, 2020 conference.

The Court needs four votes to take the case for review. If the Court decides to grant review (or certiorari), the decision would be announced late afternoon on February 12. Otherwise, a decision to decline review would be announced the following Monday February 15. The Court may punt the case to later conference in which event the cases will not be referenced in the February 15 order. All of the briefs are available by searching the Court’s docket for one of the case numbers — 19-840 or 19-841.

Medcity News provides a useful list of prescription drugs that are going off patent in 2020. The list also projects the availability of generic competitors.

Midweek Update

David Ermer–Rx coverage, SCOTUS–

The FEHBlog wishes to remind his loyal readers that you may subscribe to FEHBlog emails which arrive with the full posts the morning after the post goes live. A subscription box prominently appears on the right margin of the FEHBlog page at ermersuter.com

Has any law generated more litigation in a short period of time than the Affordable Care Act??? Katie Keith in the Health Affairs blog provides a lengthy status report on the major ACA cases pending in the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals.

In other judicial news, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled yesterday that the Department of Health and Human Services failed to follow the Administrative Procedure Act in certain respects with respect to its 2013 and 2016 rule makings on access to medical records by patients and third parties such as lawyers and insurers. The details are explained in this Health Security IT article. Due to the importance of this issue to HHS, the FEHBlog expects the agency to take remedial administrative action quickly.

In good prescription drug news:

  • Healthcare Dive reports that pharmaceutical manufactures finally are rolling out biosimilar drugs which action will lower the cost of expensive specialty drugs over time.
  • CVS Health announced today “a new solution eliminating member out-of-pocket costs associated with all diabetes prescription medications, including insulin. Offered through the company’s pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), CVS Caremark, RxZERO enables employers and health plan sponsors to leverage formulary and plan design approaches to offer all categories of diabetes medications at zero dollar out of pocket for their members without raising costs for the plan sponsor or increasing premiums or deductibles for all plan members.”

Tuesday Tidbits

David Ermer–ACA, CDC, SCOTUS–

This morning without comment, the Supreme Court denied the motion of the petitioners defending the Affordable Care Act to expedite the Court’s review of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal’s decision on the ACA’s constitutionality (Nos. 19-840, 841). The FEHBlog has long given up on trying to predict Supreme Court decisions. Now. the respondents seeking to take down the law will have until shortly after the Super Bowl to submit their briefs. The petitioners will have an opportunity to reply, and then the Supreme Court can consider the petitioner in due course, perhaps late March or April. If the Court decides to review the Fifth Circuit opinion, which the FEHBlog assumes is unlikely, the case would be argued next fall. As yet, Federal District Judge Reed O’Connor has not begun the process of reconsidering his vacated decision holding the entire remainder of the ACA inseparable from the unconstitutional ACA individual mandate at least according to the docket sheet available on PACER. The stay order that the Judge Reed entered in December 2018 states in pertinent part that “The parties are directed to notify the Court upon the conclusion of the appeal of the partial judgment within 14 days of any decision.” As the Court is busy, it’s likely that the Judge will tend to other matters until the Supreme Court decides what to do at this stage at least in the FEHBlog’s view.

The Centers for Disease Control (“CDC”) announced today that the agency

is closely monitoring developments around a novel (new) coronavirus first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Chinese authorities identified the new coronavirus, which has resulted in close to 300 confirmed cases in China, including cases outside Wuhan City, with additional cases being identified in a growing number of countries internationally. The first case in the United States was announced on January 21, 2020. There are ongoing investigations to learn more.

The Wall Street Journal reported over the weekend that

Nancy Messonnier, the CDC’s director for the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said that as health officials develop diagnostic tests and start testing people with symptoms who have traveled to Wuhan, more cases are likely to be identified around the world, including in the U.S. 

“As we start testing more, I expect that we’re going to see more cases,” she said. 

“I think it’s highly plausible there will be at least a case in the United States.” 

She called the spread a “serious issue,” but added that the CDC has “faced this challenge before.”

“Based on the info CDC has today, we believe the current risk from the virus to the general public is low,” Dr. Messonnier said in a telephonic press conference.

FYI, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has issued a report on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Benefits and Challenges of Machine Learning in Drug Development. Here’s a link to the GAO’s version of Cliff Notes on the report.

Supreme Court scheduling action

David Ermer–ACA, SCOTUS, Uncategorized–

Healthcare Dive reports that “The Supreme Court on Monday set a Friday [January 10] afternoon deadline for challengers of the ACA to respond to the blue state coalition’s motion to expedite the case.” The lead coalition member State of California has requested that the Court calendar to case for oral argument this Spring so that a Supreme Court decision may be issued before the end of the current term in late June / early July. This scheduling order allows the Supreme Court to consider the motion to expedite at its Friday January 17, 2020, conference. Approval of the motion would require the support of at least five justices. If the Court decides the motion on January 17, the decision would be announced that Friday afternoon or the following Tuesday morning. Stay tuned.