Friday Factoids

Photo by Sincerely Media on Unsplash

From Washington DC

  • The AMA News says,
    • “The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services today released a FAQ explaining how it will handle the administrative fee for out-of-network providers and group health plans that initiate payment disputes under the No Surprises Act’s independent dispute resolution process on or after Aug. 3, when a federal judge vacated nationwide a six-fold increase in the fee. According to the FAQ, the fee for disputes initiated on or after Aug. 3 or unpaid before Aug. 3 will return to $50 per party until the Departments of Health and Human Services [HHS}, Labor, and the Treasury set a new fee amount.
    • “The judge also vacated nationwide the department’s restrictions on batching related claims in a single payment dispute. In response to the ruling, CMS has suspended the IDR process, including the ability to initiate new disputes. The agency said the departments intend to reopen the portal for new disputes soon and will notify interested parties at that time.”
  • Bear in mind that the independent dispute resolution entities will continue to charge $400 to $500 per party on top of the government’s fee.

From the Rx coverage front —

  • KFF Health News notes
    • Basics — “Leqembi [the recently approved Alzheimer’s Disease infused drug] is very effective at removing amyloid plaques (a protein that clumps between neurons) from people’s brains. But it doesn’t reverse cognitive decline or prevent future deterioration.”
    • Benefits — Research suggests that patients notice a “clinically meaningful” change in cognitive performance — a noticeable alteration in their ability to think, remember, and perform daily tasks — when scores rise at least 1 point on an 18-point scale used to measure Leqembi’s impact. But the change detected after 18 months for patients taking this medication was only 0.45%.
    • Side Effects — The drugmaker reported 17% of patients taking Leqembi experienced swelling in the brain and 13% had brain bleeds. Most of these side effects occurred during the first three months of treatment and were resolved without serious consequences four months later. In slightly more than 1 in 4 cases, there were also infusion-related side effects — chills, aches, nausea, vomiting, a spike or drop in blood pressure, and more. A little-discussed side effect is a reduction in brain volume associated with Leqembi and other anti-amyloid therapies. “We don’t know what this will mean to patients long term, and that’s concerning,” Alberto Espay, a professor of neurology at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine said.
    • Not all patients will qualify. “I’m very carefully selecting the patients I think will be appropriate, focusing on people with mild cognitive symptoms who are otherwise healthy,” said Erik Musiek, an associate professor of neurology at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.
    • Costs could be considerable. Costs for Leqembi are difficult to calculate since Medicare officials haven’t announced what the government [Part B] will pay for services. But the University of Southern California estimates that a year’s worth of care, including the $26,500 cost of the medication, could total about $90,000, according to Schneider. A separate analysis by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review suggests that all the medical services necessary to administer the drug, monitor patients, and undertake needed testing could total an average of $82,500 yearly on top of Leqembi’s direct cost.
  • Medscape informs us,
    • “A novel triple agonist to receptors for three nutrient-stimulated hormones led to weight loss as high as 24% among people with overweight or obesity but who did not have type 2 diabetes when used at the highest tested dose for 48 weeks. The results are from a phase 2 study of retatrutide that was published in The New England Journal of Medicine on August 9.
    • “This level of weight loss is “unprecedented” for a medication administered for 48 weeks, commented Mary-Elizabeth Patti, MD in an editorial that accompanied the report.
    • “The findings “offer further optimism…that effective pharmacologic management of obesity and related disorders is possible,” writes Patti, a principal investigator at the Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston.”
  • BioPharma Dive reports,
    • The Food and Drug Administration has conditionally approved a new medicine for multiple myeloma, offering patients with hard-to-treat forms of the blood cancer another therapy option.
    • “The medicine, which was developed by Johnson & Johnson and will be sold under the brand name Talvey, is what’s known as a bispecific antibody. A first of its kind, Talvey binds to both “CD3,” a protein found on T cells, and “GPRC5D,” a protein found on malignant blood plasma cells, bringing the two together so the immune system has a better shot at identifying and fighting cancer.
    • “The FDA based its decision on a clinical trial that enrolled multiple myeloma patients whose disease persisted after at least four other therapies. The trial found just under three-quarters of participants responded in some way to J&J’s drug, with roughly a third going into remission. Regulators have requested additional testing to confirm the benefits of Talvey and to keep it on the market.”

From the U.S. healthcare business front,

  • Healthcare Dive lets us know,
    • “Healthcare merger and acquisition activity hit a three-year low in the second quarter of this year, according to a report by accounting firm and consultancy KPMG. 
    • “The analysis tallied 245 deals in the second quarter of 2023, a decrease of 7% compared to the same period last year and a 41% decline from the second quarter in 2021. 
    • “Ongoing financial pressures — like potential interest rate hikes, political divisions and uncertainty about valuations of acquisition targets — could keep M&A low in the second half of the year. But some of those headwinds are expected to lighten up as sell-side valuations continue to contract and companies look to divest non-core assets, giving deal-making a boost during the first half of 2024, the report noted.”
  • Fierce Healthcare tells us
    • “While major payers issued warnings to investors ahead of second-quarter earnings about rising utilization rates, patients returning to deferred services did not prevent these companies from turning a profit.
    • “UnitedHealth Group led the way yet again in profitability for the second quarter as well as the first half of 2023, according to company earnings reports. The healthcare giant posted $5.5 billion in profit for the quarter and $11.1 billion through the first six months of the year.
    • “By comparison, the next-highest company for second-quarter profit was CVS Health at $1.9 billion. CVS also reported the second-highest profit for the first half of 2023 with $4 billion, according to the filings.
    • “UnitedHealth also tops the list for revenue in the second quarter and first sixth months of the year. The company reported $92.9 billion in second-quarter revenue and $184.8 billion in midyear revenue.”
  • The AHA News reports on its President Rick Pollack’s views on controlling medical consumer debt. Of course, Mr. Pollack does not mention lowering healthcare prices which is a straight line to debt reduction. Rather, he focuses on adding administrative burdens to health insurers and plans and reducing consumer choice of health plans.