Friday Factoids

David Ermer–CDC, COVID-19, Federal employment benefits, OPM, U.S. Healthcare–
Photo by Sincerely Media on Unsplash

From the Centers for Disease Control front —

  • According to the CDC’s Weekly Interpretative Report on its Covid Data Tracker, Omicron cases, hospitalizations, and deaths continued to trend down last week while community-level statistics improved. The CDC report leads with an analysis of Omicron variants. Only 4% of U.S. counties have a high level of Covid infections based on the CDC’s Communities approach.
  • The CDC’s weekly Fluview continues its string of reports that “Seasonal influenza activity continues to decline across the country.”
  • MedPage Today reports
    • “The CDC warned of a multistate outbreak of an extensively drug-resistant strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa linked to various brands of artificial tear drops.
    • “An investigation identified artificial tears as a common exposure for many patients. Patients reported using over 10 different brands of artificial tears; EzriCare Artificial Tears, an over-the-counter product, was most common.
    • “Pending additional guidance from the CDC and FDA, “patients and healthcare providers should immediately discontinue using EzriCare Artificial Tears,” the CDC said in an advisory to its Health Alert Network.”

From the health plan design front, the FEHBlog has run across helpful articles from the Kaiser Family Foundation, the Advisory Board, and Forbes on the impact of the May 11, 2023, end of the Covid national and public health emergency. From a health plan standpoint, the biggest considerations are the end of (a) out-of-network testing and vaccine mandates and (b) the mandate to provide free rapid covid tests. Sometime in 2023, the federal government’s funding for Covid vaccines and Paxlovid will be exhausted, and health plans will need to pick up the slack.

From the FEHB front Govexec tells us

The Office of Personnel Management’s own Federal Employee Benefits Surveys, cumulatively covering hundreds of thousands of feds, have consistently reinforced this point—showing around 80% or more of feds identify strong benefits programs (led by federal retirement annuities, the Thrift Savings Plan and Federal Employees Health Benefits insurance programs) as a major part of why they stick with their jobs.  

The Employee Benefit Research Institute recently published a new report exploring such issues—one zeroing in on what makes a job “sticky” for employees, covering data and anecdotal evidence on private- and public-sector employment over the last 40 years.  

Craig Copeland, EBRI’s director of Wealth Benefits Research parsed these findings for Government Executive and affirmed that attractive federal benefits remain crucial in helping agencies retain feds. 

“Yes, it is still clear that public sector employees—including feds—are more likely to stay at their job longer than other sectors, at least up until recent years,” Copeland told Government Executive. “The defined benefits plans that public sector jobs usually provide typically are an important part of the reason that public sector employees stay longer—as well as because of the overall typically better benefits offered to public sector employees when compared with the average private sector employee.” 

However, Copeland said that it’s hard to say if these long-term trends—the popularity of strong benefits and the stickiness of the public-sector jobs that offer them—persist among the growing younger slice of feds. 

Ruh roh.

From the U.S. healthcare business front

  • The American Health Association (AHA) went bananas over the Justice Department’s unexpected withdrawal of aging antitrust guidance that favors the healthcare industry. Fierce Healthcare also discusses DOJ’s action
  • Also, from the AHA
    • Alabama hospitals lost $1.5 billion since the beginning of the pandemic, despite receiving federal COVID-19 relief funds. At the same time, costs increased $2.6 billion, leaving over half of the state’s hospitals currently operating in the red, Kaufman Hall reports. 
    • Indiana hospitals have lost $1.2 billion since 2019, with expenses for labor, medical supplies, drugs and other purchased services up by $3.2 billion, leaving many of the state’s hospitals with negative operating margins, according to a Kaufman Hall analysis.
  • The American Hospital Association’s 2023 legislative strategy is unveiled in a Politico article.