In commemoration of the President’s Day holiday tomorrow, Congress is on a local work break this week and will be back in session on February 28.
From the Omicron front, the New York Times offers an interactive article seeking to uncover the mysteries of “Long Covid.”
The accuracy of Bloomberg’s welcome report on the growing availability of Pfizer’s Paxlovid and Merck’s molnupiravir Covid pills is evidenced by the Wall Street Journal’s report that pharmacists are demanding more money to dispense those pills. Why?
Pharmacists say Paxlovid and molnupiravir prescriptions typically take more than 30 minutes to fill, longer than other drugs. They say they must often gather the medical history of new customers and then make sure they aren’t taking any other drugs that the Covid-19 pills can’t be used with safely.
Pharmacists also say they have to spend substantial time counseling patients on taking the pills.
Here’s where it stands.
The National Community Pharmacists Association trade group has urged the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to recommend a fee similar to the $40 that Medicare pays pharmacies administering Covid-19 vaccines.
The National Association of Chain Drug Stores, which represents pharmacies including Kroger Co. and Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., also supports a CMS recommendation, though it isn’t specifying an amount. The figure could help pressure all commercial and government health plans to increase how much they are paying, said Sara Roszak, senior vice president for health and wellness strategy and policy for the industry group.
Benefit managers will likely revise fees, but are looking for the government to provide more direction on what the fees should be, said JC Scott, chief executive of the Pharmaceutical Care Management Association, the trade group for pharmacy-benefit managers.
The Wall Street Journal also reports
U.S. health regulators are looking at potentially authorizing a fourth dose of a Covid-19 vaccine in the fall, according to people familiar with the matter.
The planning is still in early stages, and authorization would depend on ongoing studies establishing that a fourth dose would shore up people’s molecular defenses that waned after their first booster and reduce their risk of symptomatic and severe disease, the people said.
The Food and Drug Administration, however, has begun reviewing data so it can make a decision, the people said.
The thinking among regulators is that the agency would look at authorizing a second booster dose of the messenger RNA vaccines from Pfizer Inc. and partner BioNTech SE and from Moderna Inc., one of the people said.
Among the issues that need to be resolved, the person said, are whether the second booster should be authorized for all adults or particular age groups, and whether it should target the Omicron variant or be formulated differently. Whether the fourth booster could ultimately be the start of an annual Covid-19 vaccination is also under consideration.
It strikes the FEHBlog that this would be a good occasion for the Centers for Disease Control to position this evaluation as part of their effort to refocus Covid from pandemic to endemic status. An epidemiologist writing in STAT News explains
I’m not confident about how the pandemic endgame will play out. While I do think the most likely future scenario for SARS-CoV-2 is that it will become endemic, the other more worrisome scenarios I describe here are within the realm of possibility: a mutant that produces a different disease, a new recombinant virus, or a variant that exploits immunity. And these scenarios are not mutually exclusive. A new SARS-CoV-2 recombinant virus containing animal coronavirus genes might well cause altered disease.
After two years, why not position the country for the most likely scenario?